Bob8 wrote:kg01 wrote:Why. Are. You. Here?
And clearly you don't frequent any other teams' boards if you think that last statement is true.
I wouldn’t be here, if you didn’t write about Luka.
Did you see anything about Trae on Mavs board? Absolutely nothing. On which teams board people are bashing Trae?
Simple answer here, the Hawks have a long and storied history of screwing the pooch in the draft. There has been a running debate for a long time on should the Hawks have held on to that pick to draft Luka and it is based in this bad drafting saga. Additionally if you read back up a few posts, you'll see that I took the time to sit down and watch a full Mavs game (about the 5th time I've done it this season). I was looking at Luka and trying to honestly look at his skillset to if he should be chosen ahead of Trae for rookie of the year. Also, the Hawks have been playing much better since Dec 3rd, when Collins was back and found his legs. The Hawks began the season 5 and 18 (.217 winning percentage). Since that time, the Hawks are 19 and 29 (.395 winning percentage). They closed the gap on the Mavs in the couple of months by about 8 games. If the Mavs finish ahead of the Hawks in the standings (6th worst record), their chances of getting the Mav's pick goes up substantially. The Mavs are 2-8 in their last 10, they are 5 and 13(.278 winning%) since trading Dennis Smith away and putting the ball in Luka's hands. They were 5 games under 500 at that time, now they are 13. At the time of my original post on the matter, they were only 4 games up on the Hawks in the standings with about 16 games left. Based on their record of late and the Hawks improvement, there was a real chance they could overtake Dallas in the standings and screw themselves out of Dallas' pick this year. Hence why I looked.
When the trade of 3 for 5 and a future first was made, I was ecstatic. I believed (and still do) that Trae was a more impactful, better team player. He's exceeded my expectations on defense and Luka exceeded my expectations as a shooter. But the Hawks are highly efficient the last 30+ games on offense and are improving defensively. We currently have 30 million in dead salary on the books + Bazemore's 19 million. Most of this speculation you are hearing is multifold. It is the ongoing argument of was Trae + the pick worth Luka. Especially if the pick transfers this year at 6-8 the trade was highly worth it. If we have to wait till next year when Dallas will be improved and the pick will probably be 10-15, then its closer. The argument of Luka vs Trae isn't Luka bashing, but an ongoing evaluation of the trade in the light of Atlanta's terrible history with lotto picks.
What follows is a list of players the Hawks have taken in the first round for you to empathize with.
21 DeAndre' Bembry
15 Kelly Oubre Jr. (traded)
15 Adreian Payne (flop)
17 Dennis Schroder (head case)
18 Shane Larkin (traded to you guys)
23 John Jenkins (hahahahahah)
24 Damion Jones
17 Jeff Teague
3 Al Horford (bailed on Hawks when we signed Dwight but best Hawk draftee in forever)
11 Acie Law (SMDH at the thought Acie Law was drafted before Spencer Hawes, Thaddeus Young, Al Thornton, Nick Young, Marco Belinelli, Wilson Chandler, Tiago Splitter, Glen Davis, Marc Gasol)
2 Marvin Williams
6 Josh Childress
17 Josh Smith
21 Boris Diaw
3 Pau Gasol (traded)
6 DerMarr Johnson
That's 18 years of drafting before the last 2 years. Just look at the names who left, didn't pan out and how high a pick were wasted on them. This is why Luka v Trae matters.