Think supporters for presidential candidates are a fervent bunch? Get a load of those backing Hawks center Al Horford for NBA Rookie of the Year.
Horford's teammates know that he's trailing Seattle's Kevin Durant in the polls. That has them speaking a bit louder these days.
"It's all political," Hawks point guard Mike Bibby said. "It's been that way before I got here [to the NBA], since I've been here and will probably be that way long after I'm gone. But you've got to go with Al. He's been getting it done every night for a team that's fighting to make the playoffs."
Hawks rookie point guard Acie Law IV has ties to both candidates, giving him a unique perspective.
"Listen, Kevin Durant's a good friend of mine and a great player," Law said, "but for what Al contributes to our team, what he means to this team and how important he is to the resurgence of this franchise, I don't see how anybody but Al could win this award.
"Durant is having a great scoring year. But as far as making his teammates better and his team better, you just don't see that. With Al in the game, he makes it easier on all of our players. I think it's his award, hands down. It shouldn't even be close."
Despite Law's insistence otherwise, Durant's going to be tough to beat. He leads all rookies in scoring (19.6) by a wide margin. He's had plenty of national television exposure, something Horford and the Hawks haven't. Horford's lone experience came during the Rookie Challenge during All-Star weekend.
Horford does lead all rookies in several categories, including rebounds (9.8 ), double-doubles (20) and efficiency rating (16.4). He also ranks second in minutes (931.5), third in blocks (1.0), fourth in scoring (9.8 ) and field goal percentage (.497) and is tied for sixth in steals (0.8 ) and assists (1.5).
Horford has 35 double-digit rebound games and has already been named Eastern Conference Rookie of the Month twice (November and February).
Link
Hawks' Horford merits Rookie award
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
Hawks' Horford merits Rookie award
- HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 53,859
- And1: 10,297
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
Hawks' Horford merits Rookie award
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,088
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 27, 2003
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,088
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 27, 2003
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,321
- And1: 3
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
^^^I strongly disagree with that. I think Durant is the favorite but I wouldn't be suprised if Horford won it. Correct me if I'm wrong but 2006 was unanimous and Bargnani(lmao)was the only person to get a 1st place vote besides Roy in 07. I'd be shocked if Horford doesn't get atleast a few votes. This is just my opinion from watching the other teams feeds on League Pass.
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,321
- And1: 3
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Also..since you all are so big on plus and minus stats...Durant's +/- on the season is -9.2which is tied for Stuckey(nice player but plays behind an all-star) for the worst among rookies. Thad Young's plus/minus is actually +9.2 . I haven't checked every team(nor do I really care) but I am pretty sure that Durant has the worst plus/minus in the league among players who play regular minutes and this is playing on a complete garbage squad.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,088
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 27, 2003
HG- I have never advocated using +/- for players between teams. Particularly when one player is on an absolutely embarrassing team. (though I did say that I wanted the Hawks to take Thad Young instead of Acie law)
And you are making an argument over who deserves it. Durant is averaging almost 20 per game- Horford is averaging under 10 per game. I don't think that Horford has any chance of actually winning the award with those numbers.
And you are making an argument over who deserves it. Durant is averaging almost 20 per game- Horford is averaging under 10 per game. I don't think that Horford has any chance of actually winning the award with those numbers.
- High 5
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,657
- And1: 2,185
- Joined: Apr 21, 2006
killbuckner wrote:HG- I have never advocated using +/- for players between teams. Particularly when one player is on an absolutely embarrassing team. (though I did say that I wanted the Hawks to take Thad Young instead of Acie law)
And you are making an argument over who deserves it. Durant is averaging almost 20 per game- Horford is averaging under 10 per game. I don't think that Horford has any chance of actually winning the award with those numbers.
The voters are supposed to look at everything and not just their NBA.com profile. If you do that then Horford should definitely win. Just gotta hope the voters do that.
- JoshB914
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,889
- And1: 2
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
High 5 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
The voters are supposed to look at everything and not just their NBA.com profile. If you do that then Horford should definitely win. Just gotta hope the voters do that.
You are 100% right. Unfortunately, the voters know nothing about Al other than his nba.com profile. They just see the ESPN Hype Train, which is all about Durant, and that is going to cost Al the ROY.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,088
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 27, 2003
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,088
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 27, 2003
Durant is likely going to average EIGHT points more than the second place finisher. Thats 66% more points than second place. I doubt you can find an example of someone winning the ROY of the year over a guy scoring 3 points more per game. PPG is just what voters usually go off of. This is going to be a landslide for Durant.