Carmelo anyone??
Moderators: dms269, Jamaaliver, HMFFL
Carmelo anyone??
- geeman
- Senior
- Posts: 656
- And1: 3
- Joined: May 27, 2005
Carmelo anyone??
Carmelo for /Marvin/Jsmith or /Marvin/Bibby ????
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,317
- And1: 228
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
No...not really.
Josh Smith is a 22 year old that can affect the game on both ends. Carmelo is a scorer and a scorer only. Even ignoring DUI's, Stop Snitchin DVD's, quitting in the playoffs and throwing girly punches and running, you can't assume people would trade a guy that is a all around better player for a guy that is purely a scorer just because.
Plus that would leave the team with a hole in the front court. We have a starting small forward and no replacement for Smith in the front court.
The only person that would accept that in a instant would be a moron.
Lets not be confused here. Josh Smith is a all around better player than Anthony, and honestly is a bigger prospect with a bigger upside and contractually would be a better deal than Anthony.
Josh Smith is a 22 year old that can affect the game on both ends. Carmelo is a scorer and a scorer only. Even ignoring DUI's, Stop Snitchin DVD's, quitting in the playoffs and throwing girly punches and running, you can't assume people would trade a guy that is a all around better player for a guy that is purely a scorer just because.
Plus that would leave the team with a hole in the front court. We have a starting small forward and no replacement for Smith in the front court.
The only person that would accept that in a instant would be a moron.
Lets not be confused here. Josh Smith is a all around better player than Anthony, and honestly is a bigger prospect with a bigger upside and contractually would be a better deal than Anthony.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,837
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 24, 2007
killbuckner wrote:Rip- you know if the Nuggets offered Carmelo for Josh Smith that it would be accepted in an instant right? As long as you are saying that you personally wouldn't do the deal thats fine, but as far as actual value goes Carmelo is worth more.
Melo is definitely worth more, if only for the marketing stuff. I found it interesting that Melo doesn't have a positive effect on his team's +/-. He is really a terrible defender, he'd definitely fit in better on offense though. He plays like Smith on offense except he has a lot more finesse and a really nice midrange J.
I know we would almost have to do this deal if it was offered, I'd just hope we didn't. If Melo can't keep himself out of trouble in Denver, I don't want to imagine the negative press he'd get in the A, they are gonna be huntin for high profile "trouble makers" after MV.
Anyway, our offense would improve immensely and our defense would take a really big hit. Offense is more important and it puts people in seats.
killbuckner, I know you are a stat fan. You realize that Melo has a bad +/-, doesn't have much of a gap on Smith in terms of PER, is regressing as opposed to improving...
Its a no brainer from a marketing perspective but the basketball aspect is more complicated than you make it seem.
EDIT: and much like the Kaman deal, Denver is a bad fit for Smith because they have an unmovable player who is like a poor injured man's Josh Smith in the frontcourt and they need shooters worse than we do so Smith can't play at the 3.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,088
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 27, 2003
COB- I am definitely aware of the limitations of Carmelo's game. But he is a star offensive player in a league that pays dearly for offense. He is one of the most recognizable players in the league and is a definite face of a franchise. He is just worth more in trade than Josh Smith is. And for a team like the Hawks that struggles to get fans in the seats with Josh Smith on the roster, there is absolutely no question at all to me that the Hawks would GLADLY do Smith for Carmelo
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,317
- And1: 228
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
killbuckner wrote:COB- I am definitely aware of the limitations of Carmelo's game. But he is a star offensive player in a league that pays dearly for offense. He is one of the most recognizable players in the league and is a definite face of a franchise. He is just worth more in trade than Josh Smith is.
Except he isn't. He has taken a hit to that marketablility, and the reason he is being shopped is that he isn't the face of the franchise anymore. Iverson is/will be.
For all his faults, Iverson TRIES to play D and he is a warrior on the court and you can't point at a time he quits. The same can't be said for Allen.
Anthony is averaging one embarassing moment a year and is constantly hurting his marketability.
The Reason Josh Smith hasn't been as marketable is because he hasn't been on TV much. The Hawks have earned at least 2-3 national games next year and Joshs game as a high flying highlight reel on both end makes him a bigger potential marketing draw than the DUI having, sissy punching, stop snitcher.
From a fan GM perspective, its a no brainer. But most GM's have basketball minds and in a basketball sense, you don't make that deal.
This not even going into the fact that Smith is a hometown product and the bandwagon is going to be nice and full at the start of next year.
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 909
- And1: 159
- Joined: Apr 19, 2002
- Location: Atlanta
- Contact:
as a fan I don't make this deal. But as a GM.....of course you make the Smoove for Melo quick before the Nuggets change their mind...throw in Marvin and Zaza see if we can get Nene.
Bibby
Johnson
Melo
AL
Nene
is better than
Bibby
JJ
Marvin
JJ
AL
You've got a legit 1-4 on the
Bibby
Johnson
Melo
AL
Nene
is better than
Bibby
JJ
Marvin
JJ
AL
You've got a legit 1-4 on the
If it counts luck is worth the same as skill
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,837
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 24, 2007
killbuckner wrote:COB- I am definitely aware of the limitations of Carmelo's game. But he is a star offensive player in a league that pays dearly for offense. He is one of the most recognizable players in the league and is a definite face of a franchise. He is just worth more in trade than Josh Smith is. And for a team like the Hawks that struggles to get fans in the seats with Josh Smith on the roster, there is absolutely no question at all to me that the Hawks would GLADLY do Smith for Carmelo
I acknowledged that it would be almost impossible to say no to that deal just for the marketability reasons. I was just saying that I'm happy Denver isn't in a good position to make that trade.
Interestinly enough, the people that commented on this on the trade board said that Denver wins a Melo-Smith trade.
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,317
- And1: 228
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
But seriously, from a marketing standpoint, it would be a dumb trade for Atlanta.
Maybe if we were in another city, then fine. But you don't trade a high flying, hometown product for a guy on a marketing lull who makes his living taking jumpshots.
Carmelo's marketability was born of his rookie season. He has been less and less marketable sense.
Strictly from a marketing sense, it would be dumb to trade a guy on the decline in public perception for a guy on the rise, especially when the guy on the rise is from the City your team is based in.
Its a bad trade on the court and its a bad trade due to possibly marketability. If you are giving up Marvin, Chill, Bibby...hell, you could give up Joe and it would be a better marketing move than giving up smith.
Maybe if we were in another city, then fine. But you don't trade a high flying, hometown product for a guy on a marketing lull who makes his living taking jumpshots.
Carmelo's marketability was born of his rookie season. He has been less and less marketable sense.
Strictly from a marketing sense, it would be dumb to trade a guy on the decline in public perception for a guy on the rise, especially when the guy on the rise is from the City your team is based in.
Its a bad trade on the court and its a bad trade due to possibly marketability. If you are giving up Marvin, Chill, Bibby...hell, you could give up Joe and it would be a better marketing move than giving up smith.