ImageImage

Channing Frye

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

Harry10
Banned User
Posts: 8,784
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 16, 2002

Channing Frye 

Post#1 » by Harry10 » Sun Jun 8, 2008 11:07 pm

i'm not a huge fan...... but wouldn't he compliment Horford's game?
User avatar
ATLfan
Junior
Posts: 488
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 12, 2007
Location: Shocking the World!!!

 

Post#2 » by ATLfan » Sun Jun 8, 2008 11:12 pm

Channing is everything we would want David Andersen to be and either one would open up the court for our wings to get inside and score.
Harry10
Banned User
Posts: 8,784
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 16, 2002

 

Post#3 » by Harry10 » Sun Jun 8, 2008 11:34 pm

i really hope they don't force DA to play center.
FCNATL85
Starter
Posts: 2,341
And1: 12
Joined: Jul 10, 2003

 

Post#4 » by FCNATL85 » Mon Jun 9, 2008 5:22 am

Frye- Jones- Jack+ #36 for Marvin + Acie + Atl 2nd 09

Al- Frye- Zaza
Smothe- jones- Anderson
chil- JJ- Jones- FA(Hayes?)
JJ - Jones- Mario
Bibby - Jack- FA

Before deadline, trade Bibby+ Hayes or Jones for starting SG, moving JJ to SF

Al
Smothe
JJ
Reed
Jack
User avatar
evildallas
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: in the land of weak ownership
Contact:

 

Post#5 » by evildallas » Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:42 am

To me it is kind of a toss up between Channing Frye, Charlie Villanueva and David Andersen. I like what I've seen from DA in the smattering of European games I've seen, but I'm not sure how well that translates to the NBA. If it does then he has more of ability to play in the defensive post than the other 2 who are considered soft PFs. Frye and Villanueva were lottery picks and will be coming off their rookie deals after this year. I'm not sure if Andersen is more or less expensive in comparison.

I do know that the above offer is bad. Frye/Jones/2nd for Marvin is more equitable although Jones can opt out of his deal. Frye/Jack/2nd for Marvin is also somewhat equitable but doesn't work under the cap rules. While I feel those are equitable, I still would do them because it the risk is completely on our GM. If Marvin explodes this season, Portland got him for expiring spare parts from the same draft. Frye and Jones are role players that help with our depth, but don't merit a long term investment. If Marvin flops, he didn't cost them much in the grand scheme.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
CWell
Junior
Posts: 374
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Location: College Park,GA

 

Post#6 » by CWell » Mon Jun 9, 2008 11:46 am

FCNATL85 wrote:Frye- Jones- Jack+ #36 for Marvin + Acie + Atl 2nd 09

Al- Frye- Zaza
Smothe- jones- Anderson
chil- JJ- Jones- FA(Hayes?)
JJ - Jones- Mario
Bibby - Jack- FA

Before deadline, trade Bibby+ Hayes or Jones for starting SG, moving JJ to SF

Al
Smothe
JJ
Reed
Jack
dumb trade beyond measure.Doesn't make any sense at all,it makes us worse.First of all we ARE NOT trading Acie,he's our furture starting PG,and starting Jack is a HUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE downgrade.I'd want Jack to backup Acie but not that,that's horrible.That trade is totally lopsided,and who the heck is Reed?,who the heck is SmotheThat post almost made me throw up my breakfast. :banghead:
td00
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,858
And1: 70
Joined: Aug 23, 2005
Location: CATLANTA

When does DA arrive? 

Post#7 » by td00 » Mon Jun 9, 2008 3:52 pm

Does the David Andersen fantasy have a deadline? When will we hear if he is coming to our team?

I see a lot of comments here, but nothing from the team has come out as far as I know.
Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,479
And1: 2,178
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
   

 

Post#8 » by Village Idiot » Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:52 am

KISS

Frye and Jack for Marvin works better and seems more probable.
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
LaMark
Ballboy
Posts: 15
And1: 0
Joined: May 27, 2007
Location: Sydney Australia

 

Post#9 » by LaMark » Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:58 am

FCNATL85 wrote:Frye- Jones- Jack+ #36 for Marvin + Acie + Atl 2nd 09


Thats pretty generous of you, considering Jones may opt out and Jack is a wash.. so for the blazers it would be Frye for Marvin and Acie :pray: ...

But seriously - not a great deal for you guys as Marvin had a great run in the playoffs and Bibby will soon be done.

If I were you, much rather have another banger with Horford than a soft PF..
User avatar
JoshB914
Head Coach
Posts: 6,889
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 16, 2006

 

Post#10 » by JoshB914 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:27 pm

^^^ Agree with most of that. Except for that part about Marvin being good in the playoffs. He was a liability for six of seven games.
massey1992
Banned User
Posts: 523
And1: 0
Joined: May 10, 2008

 

Post#11 » by massey1992 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:45 pm

I would think that the Hawks would be interested in acquiring Frye. He could be a solid addition to their team.
User avatar
PhilipNelsonFan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,246
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 11, 2004

 

Post#12 » by PhilipNelsonFan » Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:09 pm

He's yours for your 2009 first-rounder. (Top-10 protected, of course.)
Tim Lehrbach wrote:I will break the Rose Garden.
HoopsGuru25
General Manager
Posts: 9,321
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 18, 2006

 

Post#13 » by HoopsGuru25 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:42 pm

Frye is a bad fit on the Hawks...especially if they have to trade another asset to get him. We don't need a finesse big men backing up Horford and Smith. I don't see the need to get acquire a below average defensive center this year when Zaza is already making $4 million to play that role. We need someone like Jeff Foster,Nene(hopefully), Diop, etc who is going to bang down low.
dms269
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 8,745
And1: 1,727
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
     

 

Post#14 » by dms269 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 7:57 pm

HoopsGuru25 wrote:Frye is a bad fit on the Hawks...especially if they have to trade another asset to get him. We don't need a finesse big men backing up Horford and Smith. I don't see the need to get acquire a below average defensive center this year when Zaza is already making $4 million to play that role. We need someone like Jeff Foster,Nene(hopefully), Diop, etc who is going to bang down low.


Ding, ding, ding.

Frye does what for us? He gives us a soft big man who can't defend and is a liability downlow against stronger players. He would cost us a valuable piece and we can have DA who is probably better and not have to give up a piece of our future.
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
Rip2137
Analyst
Posts: 3,317
And1: 228
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

 

Post#15 » by Rip2137 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:10 pm

JoshB914 wrote:^^^ Agree with most of that. Except for that part about Marvin being good in the playoffs. He was a liability for six of seven games.


Repeating that won't make it true.
User avatar
JoshB914
Head Coach
Posts: 6,889
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 16, 2006

 

Post#16 » by JoshB914 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:08 pm

Are you serious? I figured even you would admit that Marvin's showing in the playoffs was pitiful. He missed open shots, dissapeared from games, turned the ball over, and was suspect on defense.

Defending Marvin for last season is one thing, but there is no way you can argue he was even serviceable during the postseason.
SendEm
Banned User
Posts: 2,285
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 13, 2007

 

Post#17 » by SendEm » Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:33 am

Frye+Jack for Marvin+Acie is an equal trade. It's not Portland's fault that Atlanta drafted such average young basketball players so high in the draft.
killbuckner
RealGM
Posts: 13,088
And1: 0
Joined: May 27, 2003

 

Post#18 » by killbuckner » Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:34 am

marvin and Acie are worth far more than Frye and Jack. Not even particularly close. And I say this as the person on the board who has been for a ton of marvin trades and who has been in fierce arguments about how bad Acie is, its just that Frye and Jack are not particularly valuable at all.
SendEm
Banned User
Posts: 2,285
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 13, 2007

 

Post#19 » by SendEm » Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:13 pm

Marvin is a tweener SF that seemingly gets in the way of the other BETTER players on his team. Jack is a PG that has started in this league. Frye is a PF/C that can shoot and PF/C always have value in the NBA. Acie is a bench PG that isn't even good enough to get minutes on a very bad team. Atlanta just has the two players with the highest draft positions but they aren't clearly better players. Marvin has VERY LITTLE value in the NBA. No team wants that guy a freakin tweener SF.
User avatar
evildallas
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: in the land of weak ownership
Contact:

 

Post#20 » by evildallas » Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:39 am

PhilipNelsonFan wrote:He's yours for your 2009 first-rounder. (Top-10 protected, of course.)


Too pricey.

Return to Atlanta Hawks