Channing Frye
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
Channing Frye
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 8,784
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Channing Frye
i'm not a huge fan...... but wouldn't he compliment Horford's game?
- evildallas
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,412
- And1: 1
- Joined: Aug 11, 2005
- Location: in the land of weak ownership
- Contact:
To me it is kind of a toss up between Channing Frye, Charlie Villanueva and David Andersen. I like what I've seen from DA in the smattering of European games I've seen, but I'm not sure how well that translates to the NBA. If it does then he has more of ability to play in the defensive post than the other 2 who are considered soft PFs. Frye and Villanueva were lottery picks and will be coming off their rookie deals after this year. I'm not sure if Andersen is more or less expensive in comparison.
I do know that the above offer is bad. Frye/Jones/2nd for Marvin is more equitable although Jones can opt out of his deal. Frye/Jack/2nd for Marvin is also somewhat equitable but doesn't work under the cap rules. While I feel those are equitable, I still would do them because it the risk is completely on our GM. If Marvin explodes this season, Portland got him for expiring spare parts from the same draft. Frye and Jones are role players that help with our depth, but don't merit a long term investment. If Marvin flops, he didn't cost them much in the grand scheme.
I do know that the above offer is bad. Frye/Jones/2nd for Marvin is more equitable although Jones can opt out of his deal. Frye/Jack/2nd for Marvin is also somewhat equitable but doesn't work under the cap rules. While I feel those are equitable, I still would do them because it the risk is completely on our GM. If Marvin explodes this season, Portland got him for expiring spare parts from the same draft. Frye and Jones are role players that help with our depth, but don't merit a long term investment. If Marvin flops, he didn't cost them much in the grand scheme.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
-
- Junior
- Posts: 374
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 03, 2006
- Location: College Park,GA
dumb trade beyond measure.Doesn't make any sense at all,it makes us worse.First of all we ARE NOT trading Acie,he's our furture starting PG,and starting Jack is a HUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE downgrade.I'd want Jack to backup Acie but not that,that's horrible.That trade is totally lopsided,and who the heck is Reed?,who the heck is SmotheThat post almost made me throw up my breakfast.FCNATL85 wrote:Frye- Jones- Jack+ #36 for Marvin + Acie + Atl 2nd 09
Al- Frye- Zaza
Smothe- jones- Anderson
chil- JJ- Jones- FA(Hayes?)
JJ - Jones- Mario
Bibby - Jack- FA
Before deadline, trade Bibby+ Hayes or Jones for starting SG, moving JJ to SF
Al
Smothe
JJ
Reed
Jack

When does DA arrive?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,858
- And1: 70
- Joined: Aug 23, 2005
- Location: CATLANTA
When does DA arrive?
Does the David Andersen fantasy have a deadline? When will we hear if he is coming to our team?
I see a lot of comments here, but nothing from the team has come out as far as I know.
I see a lot of comments here, but nothing from the team has come out as far as I know.
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 15
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: Sydney Australia
FCNATL85 wrote:Frye- Jones- Jack+ #36 for Marvin + Acie + Atl 2nd 09
Thats pretty generous of you, considering Jones may opt out and Jack is a wash.. so for the blazers it would be Frye for Marvin and Acie

But seriously - not a great deal for you guys as Marvin had a great run in the playoffs and Bibby will soon be done.
If I were you, much rather have another banger with Horford than a soft PF..
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,321
- And1: 3
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Frye is a bad fit on the Hawks...especially if they have to trade another asset to get him. We don't need a finesse big men backing up Horford and Smith. I don't see the need to get acquire a below average defensive center this year when Zaza is already making $4 million to play that role. We need someone like Jeff Foster,Nene(hopefully), Diop, etc who is going to bang down low.
-
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 8,745
- And1: 1,727
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
-
HoopsGuru25 wrote:Frye is a bad fit on the Hawks...especially if they have to trade another asset to get him. We don't need a finesse big men backing up Horford and Smith. I don't see the need to get acquire a below average defensive center this year when Zaza is already making $4 million to play that role. We need someone like Jeff Foster,Nene(hopefully), Diop, etc who is going to bang down low.
Ding, ding, ding.
Frye does what for us? He gives us a soft big man who can't defend and is a liability downlow against stronger players. He would cost us a valuable piece and we can have DA who is probably better and not have to give up a piece of our future.
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
- JoshB914
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,889
- And1: 2
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Are you serious? I figured even you would admit that Marvin's showing in the playoffs was pitiful. He missed open shots, dissapeared from games, turned the ball over, and was suspect on defense.
Defending Marvin for last season is one thing, but there is no way you can argue he was even serviceable during the postseason.
Defending Marvin for last season is one thing, but there is no way you can argue he was even serviceable during the postseason.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,285
- And1: 1
- Joined: Dec 13, 2007
Marvin is a tweener SF that seemingly gets in the way of the other BETTER players on his team. Jack is a PG that has started in this league. Frye is a PF/C that can shoot and PF/C always have value in the NBA. Acie is a bench PG that isn't even good enough to get minutes on a very bad team. Atlanta just has the two players with the highest draft positions but they aren't clearly better players. Marvin has VERY LITTLE value in the NBA. No team wants that guy a freakin tweener SF.
- evildallas
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,412
- And1: 1
- Joined: Aug 11, 2005
- Location: in the land of weak ownership
- Contact: