Rip2137 wrote:It wasn't deceiving. That is what happens you play a team that puts up quick shots. They will go down big, and they will give up leads.
If you are playing a team that chucks the way the Warriors(or Knicks or formally Suns) things like that are going to happen.
The hawks won big because they were the better team. They played well, had a dry spell. Its basketball. It happens.
While I agree with you that the Warriors are more prone to going on and giving up big runs than most teams because of their pace-this has been a constant trend in the Hawks games this month. The Hawks have completely blown double digit leads to New York,Cleveland,and Golden State. The Hawks have come back to tie or take the lead despite double digit deficits vs Houston,Miami,and Charlotte. They also had a 26 point lead cut down to 6 vs Memphis(which wasn't televised),and games vs Dallas and San Antonio where we were only down one possession in the last minute of the game despite trailing by double digits earlier on in both of those games as well. That's a pretty large sample size of inconsistent basketball(and it also says that the Hawks don't go down easily)...especially considering that we are one of the slowest paced teams in the league unlike NY or GS. I also don't think the Hawks should be neck and neck 3 quarters through the way at home vs a team w/o 3 of their top 4 players but that's another story.
Good call on Diaw so far btw.