Who would the Hornets want to get rid of so badly that they'd be willing to part with Paul? Peja Stojakovic ($13.39 million next season and $14.26 in 2010-11) would definitely be part of the deal. Chandler ($12.3 next season and $13.2 in 2010-11) probably would be included, too. Morris Peterson (due a total of $12 million over the next two seasons) or James Posey ($19.5 million over three seasons) are other possibilities. http://mavsblog.dallasnews.com/archives ... for-m.html
Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
- HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 53,958
- And1: 10,349
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
I'm not expecting Chris Paul to be moved, but it's a topic to discuss, and if New Orleans is willing to move him we need to pursue him. They still have other player of interest that will be on the block. This is a Mavericks article that was found on Hoopsworld.com
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
- Rod700
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 943
- And1: 3
- Joined: Apr 03, 2002
- Location: Try to Read More Than You Post
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
I agree that they won't move him, but even if they did, I don't think we would be a good trade partner. They would very likely want a point guard in return. We could sign and trade them an aging point guard in Bibby, or we could give them Flip if they are content selecting a starter (or back up with more than ususal minutes) in the draft, and that's a big if. From there they would probably want to move Chandler's contract, and if we wanted to remain competitive for Paul, we would have to oblige that desire as best we could. We would have to give them Horford, which they might not be too excited about having, since he is 6'10" and would be playing in the West. In the unlikely event they move him, he is likely going somewhere else unless we could very skillfully involve a third team.
EDIT: Just to add to that, I don't think they would interested in Josh Smith that much either, since they would likely package Chandler with Paul, leaving no need for a power forward.
EDIT: Just to add to that, I don't think they would interested in Josh Smith that much either, since they would likely package Chandler with Paul, leaving no need for a power forward.
Pointing Out What Is Wrong With Other People's Posts Is Easy, Helping Them Develop Their Ideas Takes Skill
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
- Rod700
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 943
- And1: 3
- Joined: Apr 03, 2002
- Location: Try to Read More Than You Post
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
Not to deviate from my previous statement, but just taking a long shot on a trade scenario:
Johnson: 15 mil
Horford: 4.3 mil
Bibby: 8.5? (S&T)
Total = 27.8
Paul: 13.8
Chandler 11.9
Whoever we can get out of Peterson, Posey, and Daniels: About 6.3
Total = 32 mil
That's close to something I guess. Joe's contract would need to be extended though. Don't see them doing it though.
Johnson: 15 mil
Horford: 4.3 mil
Bibby: 8.5? (S&T)
Total = 27.8
Paul: 13.8
Chandler 11.9
Whoever we can get out of Peterson, Posey, and Daniels: About 6.3
Total = 32 mil
That's close to something I guess. Joe's contract would need to be extended though. Don't see them doing it though.
Pointing Out What Is Wrong With Other People's Posts Is Easy, Helping Them Develop Their Ideas Takes Skill
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
- LL Cool Scott
- Starter
- Posts: 2,454
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
Maybe they'd do a deal straight up for Marvin Williams.
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,316
- And1: 469
- Joined: May 02, 2001
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
"I'd offer Marvin Williams." coming in 3...2...1
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,316
- And1: 469
- Joined: May 02, 2001
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
LL Cool Scott wrote:Maybe they'd do a deal straight up for Marvin Williams.
Awww! Ya beat me!
My mother told me, she said, "Elwood, to make it in this world you either have to be oh, so clever or oh, so pleasant." Well, for years I was clever; I recommend pleasant.
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart, in the film "Harvey")
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,293
- And1: 603
- Joined: Oct 23, 2004
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
Funniest...wiretap...ever.
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
- HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 53,958
- And1: 10,349
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
mrhonline wrote:Funniest...wiretap...ever.
I'm just waiting for the __Enter Team__ May Make Play For Lebron James.
A Dallas writer comes up with some things off the top of his head and it blows up.

Didn't help with me creating this topic, but I wanted us to look at other players on New Orleans who may help us become a better team.
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,293
- And1: 603
- Joined: Oct 23, 2004
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
Any interest in Hilton Armstrong?
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
- evildallas
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,412
- And1: 1
- Joined: Aug 11, 2005
- Location: in the land of weak ownership
- Contact:
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
Disagree with Paul being traded at all, but for kicks I will entertain the thought and work the math. Even with his PPP status the following works in Trade Checker:
Chris Paul
Peja Stojakovic
Hilton Armstrong
for
Joe Johnson (expiring)
Speedy Claxton (expiring)
Acie Law (expiring)
Randolph Morris (expiring)
1st in 2010
Immediate saving of 6.5M dollars next year which should almost be enough to get them out of luxury tax area. Joe gives them a replacement all-star to remain competitive or they can treat him as an expiring contract. The pick is in 2010 to allow the trade to go down after 7/1 if necessary and to save them the cost of another pick this year. Realistically they would need to make another deal to get safely under the luxury tax, but there is only so much you can do with a single deal.
Our line up would become:
Paul/Flip (resigned)
Mo Evans/Mario (resigned)
Marvin (resigned)/Peja
Josh/Hilton
Al/Zaza (resigned)
Add the draft pick of BPA and 2nd round BPA and you have a full roster.
Of course, New Orleans can't be desperate enough to trade the face of the franchise to get rid of the contract of Peja.
Chris Paul
Peja Stojakovic
Hilton Armstrong
for
Joe Johnson (expiring)
Speedy Claxton (expiring)
Acie Law (expiring)
Randolph Morris (expiring)
1st in 2010
Immediate saving of 6.5M dollars next year which should almost be enough to get them out of luxury tax area. Joe gives them a replacement all-star to remain competitive or they can treat him as an expiring contract. The pick is in 2010 to allow the trade to go down after 7/1 if necessary and to save them the cost of another pick this year. Realistically they would need to make another deal to get safely under the luxury tax, but there is only so much you can do with a single deal.
Our line up would become:
Paul/Flip (resigned)
Mo Evans/Mario (resigned)
Marvin (resigned)/Peja
Josh/Hilton
Al/Zaza (resigned)
Add the draft pick of BPA and 2nd round BPA and you have a full roster.
Of course, New Orleans can't be desperate enough to trade the face of the franchise to get rid of the contract of Peja.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 8,784
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Re: Possible Trade Block: Chris Paul
Joe, Acie, Speedy for CP3, Tyson, Posey
Tyson
Smith/Horford
Marvin/Smith
Posey
CP3

Tyson
Smith/Horford
Marvin/Smith
Posey
CP3
