RealGM

will Crawford do a better job on Mo, offensively and defensively, than Bibby?

NO!!! Crawford is less committed on defense than Bibby is.

JCs size will cause matchup problems on offense and defense.

Crawford actually penetrates well, something Bibby was not known for.

But we only play CLE 3 times, so planning for MO probably isnt of great concern. Not with Arenas, VC, Wade within the division.....and Shaq now with the Cavs.

Jamaaliver wrote:JCs size will cause matchup problems on offense and defense.

Crawford actually penetrates well, something Bibby was not known for.

But we only play CLE 3 times, so planning for MO probably isnt of great concern. Not with Arenas, VC, Wade within the division.....and Shaq now with the Cavs.

it is 7........... the last 4 games the Hawks played, Mo Williams was their

crawford would destroy mo he to short he is a baby to jamal

Jamal is 6'5 with very long arms, that alone makes jamal better than Bibby on defense. No, Jamal is not great on defense but on his worst day he's better than bibby period.

Let's be perfectly clear, Jamal plays absolutely no defense whatsoever. None.

SneakerKing33 wrote:NO!!! Crawford is less committed on defense than Bibby is.

Not true...when Brown was our coach he played pretty good d.

Harry10 wrote:will Crawford do a better job on Mo, offensively and defensively, than Bibby?

Jamal kills him every time when he played against him on the Knicks. Mo can not guard him to save his life. To be honest one-on-one there are only a few players in this league that can check Jamal.

But if beating Mo was enough to win games, Crawford would already be champion.
I don't think that MO Vs Bibby was the main problem making 0-4 (said it's the question of this thread).

I agree that having Crawford add possibilities, if we keep Bibby too, but at this point, if we have to keep only Crawford, he can bring more than Bibby and some points, but will also bring less on other, and we would not be better against CLE.

Ramon > Mo > Crawford.