Page 1 of 1

Ben Wallace

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:10 am
by HMFFL
If Ben Wallace is indeed on the market we need to make a run at him. After hitting the foundation of youth this year I doubt Ben plans on retiring after the seasons like he originally planned.

The Nuggets are said to be interested in Detroit center Ben Wallace.
Rip Hamilton and Tayshaun Prince are obviously on the block, but Joe Dumars is suddenly talking about keeping the roster intact since the first half of the season was an injury disaster for the Pistons. Link

Re: Ben Wallace

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:47 am
by evildallas
I touched on Ben Wallace's situation a few weeks ago after Detroit barely lost to Orlando and Howard was primarily held in check (someone else brought up the trade idea). Contract match is easy (veteran minimum after he was bought out), but we'd probably have to offer a 1st rounder to get Detroit to bite unless Wallace asks to be dealt.

If we could get Wallace and maybe their 2nd for either Collins or Morris and the 1st rounder, it might be preferable to the Kurt Thomas deal because we could keep Mo Evans for perimeter help. Mind you a 1st round pick (even a low one) is quite a rental price.

Re: Ben Wallace

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:55 am
by raleigh
I'm afraid a 1st is simply too much. Wallace is the big I want more than any other, but I just can't figure out any way Atlanta could get him.

Re: Ben Wallace

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:08 am
by dms269
I would prefer the first.

Re: Ben Wallace

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:38 am
by FCNATL85
Unless you do something like
1) Ben for Morris (prospect) and ATL 2nd
OR
2) Ben + DET 2nd for Collins + ATL 1st, as of today trading down 11 spots on the draft for Ben.
OR adding other players in the mix
3) Ben + Stuckey + 2nd (and signing FA SF) for Morris + Mo + Teague + 1st

I like the latter but 2nd is probably more realistic...

Re: Ben Wallace

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:41 am
by FCNATL85
would you do with SAN

Dyess + Hill + Mason for Bibby + Evans + Morris + 2nd?

I like Hill's potential. Turn around and trade Collins for a late 2nd to a team desparate for bigs...

Re: Ben Wallace

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:09 am
by evildallas
I don't see Hill being on the table nor do I see San Antonio interested in Bibby. I like idea of the 2nd coming back in the deal for Ben, but again anything involving Ben requires him wanting to go. Stuckey likely isn't available either.

Re: Ben Wallace

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:51 pm
by td00
Wallace hasn't been productive anywhere except Detroit lately. You probably do have to overpay to get him.
I don't see why Drew Gooden couldn't be an option? We need some depth like Boston had a few years back as they could bring out a Powe or Perkins to clog the middle.

We are one big guy away from taking a shot at the ECF.

Re: Ben Wallace

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:09 am
by FCNATL85
Boston is making a move for Robinson because our slow (BibbY) or tall (JJ/ JC) or unexperienced (Teague) back-court cannot stop him...
Cleveland is getting better, Boston is getting better.

Why not try a move with MEM? see other posting.

Re: Ben Wallace

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:04 pm
by Macho Man
FCNATL85 wrote:Boston is making a move for Robinson because our slow (BibbY) or tall (JJ/ JC) or unexperienced (Teague) back-court cannot stop him...
Cleveland is getting better, Boston is getting better.

Why not try a move with MEM? see other posting.


MO CAN STOP ANYONE!!!