dpaulh wrote:D21 wrote:Then ATL would be the first team, with enough space under the tax to use all or big part of his MLE, but that did not use it at all, while trying to win a championship... I let you guess if this team is really wanting to win a title at this moment.
On the other side, I can understand why owner or GM don't want to add salaries if they know that Woody will still continue to use only 6 players.
I don't get where the negativity is coming from. We "desperately" tried to get Ilgauskas and he chose Cleveland instead. Give me one name available out there that would improve our team.
I know you are about to throw a 4 or 5 name out and I guarantee you that he will be worse than Zaza and Joe Smith.
I don't understand why there is still hate for Woody. He has coached very well this year and I think he is the key to whether or not Joe returns.
I am sorry, but I am not talking about negativity for the pleasure of doing it.
Yes I am happy with the fact that ATL is still in the race for home court advantage, and even a 2nd seed. It's only that sometimes, like in this moment, I feel the reality, and not negativity by itself. And IMO, the reality is that this team, this season, is not build for a championship.
You thought I would give you some names, but actually, I was not talking about players available now, but more about the summer market, and if I said that, it was because I think that a team building for a championship spend at least all the the money available under the tax, or almost that.
Regarding Ilgauskas, that's a good thing we show that kind of reaction, but what can prove they "desperately" tried to get Ilgauskas ?
They "desperately" call him, included some players, but did he get a better offer than other team ?
Did ATL offer him a two-years contract ? Did ATL offer him a contract for more than the minimum ?
We don't know.
If at least it was official that ATL offered more than CLE or other teams, it would prove they "desperately" tried, but other than that, that's not something you can use as valid argument.
And all of that while we know there was 99% of chances he should come back to CLE.
I had no problem with Woody at the beginning, but more and more, I see him playing a 6 players rotation, which appears to not be the best for a "championship team".
I just think that the goal is too do better than last year, with better resistance in second round, and if possible Conference Final. But don't get me wrong, I will be happy with that, even if I realized this last days that the same team than last year, would certainly have at this moment nearly the same record than this team, and I think it's what made me more pessimist.
We were all happy at the beginning of the season, with some doubts on the impact of Crawford,... and it first looked like Crawford was exactly what the team needed, but actually, that's wrong. Yes there a better potential, but the teams doesn't reach it, and continue to loose the games needed to be ahead of ORL or BOS, and still the same problem with ORL.
On the positive sides, ATL seems, with Crawford, to match up better against CLE, because they can't just guard Joe anymore.
That is why I am starting to think that Woody prefers CLE, and wants the 4th seed. It's all benefit for the team and him, because even if they loose in second round, but against CLE, just avoiding a sweep will look like an improvement, which is not right, because last year, there were 3 injured players, so even the same roster would have do better this year.
I have to admit that now, we have Crawford who helps against team like CLE, so the team is actually better than last year in any game with CLE.
Last point on Woody, he seems to coach better, but why did he say that he will use a bigger rotation, and ends with a 6 players rotation, while he was working with 8 players last year ?
If there is no injury, which I hope, it will be a better post-season than last year, that's sure, but if there is one core player out, it's a different thing, and you can put him on Woody for bad managing of the roster.