celticgreenie wrote:Rumors are Jordan Poole is on the market again. Celtics were interested in him before going with the Porzingis trade. I'm not a Poole guy but I wonder if Brad kicks the tires again.
Poole is not a good basketball player
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
celticgreenie wrote:Rumors are Jordan Poole is on the market again. Celtics were interested in him before going with the Porzingis trade. I'm not a Poole guy but I wonder if Brad kicks the tires again.
165bows wrote:djFan71 wrote:yeleven11 wrote:
Bro that guy made it sound like the Jrue Holiday value is HIGH. LETS GOOOOO
Jeesh, better than Carter & Keegan and picks??? Dang.
That’s the issue with listening to random posters on this site. They’ll tell you the Celtics are a super team then next instant they’ll turn so fast they’ll whiplash themselves saying every guy they can lay eyes on is a negative value.
playa-hater wrote:165bows wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:
At 37:30 of this, they report that the Kings checked in on Jrue, but were told that there were better offers on the table
Yeah that’s my first thought re: the Kings, they don’t have anything to offer.
I am not sure I understand this. Don't the kings have quite a few first round picks because of the fox trade? Even if they do not come this season.
At some point a team like Detroit will go over the cap. Would they be a team willing to go above the cap but below the aprons by trading expiring contracts to get a Championship proven veteran? Remember how much trouble they already gave the Knicks. Maybe the Celtics take some, but not alot of salary back. If we believe that Sacramento is eliminated because other teams had better offers, then those offers must contain significantly less salary coming back.TSmith0197 wrote:celtxman wrote:yeleven11 wrote:Celtics reporting from Jake Fischer this morning:
In Boston's case: There was a considerable amount of chatter circulating amongst rival teams during NBA Draft Combine Week in Chicago last month that potential suitors for Kristaps Porziņģis or Jrue Holiday would want some sort of sweetener compensation attached by the Celtics in exchange for their willingness to take back those contracts.
Such mighty talk has begun to fade.
Boston is certainly looking to cut salary to reduce its luxury tax bill and duck under the second apron, but the Celtics are said to be conducting their mid-June business with confidence that they can make deals that bring positive value back to Boston, league sources say.
The Celtics are not operating to date like a team desperate to shed salary. They have also given some rival teams a sense that a sequence of trades could be coming that merely start in the offseason and potentially even continue up to the in-season trade deadline ... such as dealing away Porzingis' $30.7 million contract for a lesser salary in return and then attempting to trim costs again before the February trade buzzer.
That would actually be similar to the chain of events that landed Holiday with the Celtics in the first place, when Portland moved on from players it acquired in the Damian Lillard blockbuster in stages.
Boston is believed to be open to listening to any player on its roster not named Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown. I'd put Payton Pritchard and Derrick White right behind those two franchise cornerstones as extremely hard-to-get as well.
The Celtics would likely have to listen to any ultra-aggressive offer for this season's Sixth Man of the Year, but Pritchard is currently projected to shoulder a significant role in Boston's offense for the 2025-26 season, with the Celtics hopeful of remaining competitive in the Eastern Conference even while Tatum is on the mend from his devastating Achilles tear. White, meanwhile, has been so essential to Boston on both sides of the floor that it sounds as though the Celtics would need their version of the offer that blew away Brooklyn and forced the Nets to part with Mikal Bridges to entertain surrendering him.
This lines up with what I think they should do. Trade Jrue for essentially no salary coming back and hopefully something more in return like picks.
After that trade other teams know they can't hold the 2nd apron over their head. Then on to KP. The offer has to be one that would be as good as if this were a healthy Porzingis at the trade deadline. If not wait.
Getting something from each trade (Jrue/KP ) is good too.
I find it hard to see Hauser back with all of the financial stuff
The only team that can essentially trade with no salary coming back is the Nets, every team over the 2nd apron are going to be calling them.
celtxman wrote:At some point a team like Detroit will go over the cap. Would they be a team willing to go above the cap but below the aprons by trading expiring contracts to get a Championship proven veteran? Remember how much trouble they already gave the Knicks. Maybe the Celtics take some, but not alot of salary back. If we believe that Sacramento is eliminated because other teams had better offers, then those offers must contain significantly less salary coming back.TSmith0197 wrote:celtxman wrote: This lines up with what I think they should do. Trade Jrue for essentially no salary coming back and hopefully something more in return like picks.
After that trade other teams know they can't hold the 2nd apron over their head. Then on to KP. The offer has to be one that would be as good as if this were a healthy Porzingis at the trade deadline. If not wait.
Getting something from each trade (Jrue/KP ) is good too.
I find it hard to see Hauser back with all of the financial stuff
The only team that can essentially trade with no salary coming back is the Nets, every team over the 2nd apron are going to be calling them.
- Every rumor and everything I’ve heard points to the same exact scenario for Boston this summer: Move Jrue Holiday and maybe Sam Hauser to cut costs. They’ll listen to offers for Kristaps Porzingis and, if one of those makes sense, they’ll do that too, but the preference is to push that to the trade deadline and see how Jayson Tatum’s recovery is going. Jaylen Brown, Derrick White, and Payton Pritchard are not off the table, but any offers including one of those guys has to be a no-brainer for Boston.
I’ll say it again: Brad Stevens wants to squeeze every ounce of championship contention out of this roster that he can. We can say on the outside that it’s time to do X, Y, and Z, but Stevens is going to follow a path that gives his team a chance to contend. He owes it to everyone in the organization, and to himself, to go into this season taking as few bullets as possible in order to put the best roster on the floor.
And if Tatum ends up behind schedule or out for the whole year, then they can adjust at the trade deadline. Trust me, using the urgency of the trade deadline to move some of these guys will work out much better for Boston if it comes to that.
Larry_Russell wrote:Hauser (into TPE) to Orlando for #16 and Caleb Houston
Save 8 million, Orlando stays under 2nd apron and Celtics move up enough to grab Fleming.
Can use 28 or 32 to shed rest of salary from a Jrue trade (Dallas)
redslastlaugh wrote:I'm not a subscriber to Marc Stein substack ... but article today from Jake L Fischer is "LOTS (more) around-the-NBA Intel: The Celtics feature prominently in this notes compilation ... as does a significant update out of Philadelphia"
any posters subscribe to Stein and can provide a write up?
hugepatsfan wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:Hauser (into TPE) to Orlando for #16 and Caleb Houston
Save 8 million, Orlando stays under 2nd apron and Celtics move up enough to grab Fleming.
Can use 28 or 32 to shed rest of salary from a Jrue trade (Dallas)
Hauser isn't worth #16.
Larry_Russell wrote:hugepatsfan wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:Hauser (into TPE) to Orlando for #16 and Caleb Houston
Save 8 million, Orlando stays under 2nd apron and Celtics move up enough to grab Fleming.
Can use 28 or 32 to shed rest of salary from a Jrue trade (Dallas)
Hauser isn't worth #16.
Its hauser and 28 or 31 to a team desparate for shooting. Might not be that far fetched.
hugepatsfan wrote:Truth often lies in the middle. Early reports were that BOS would have to attach picks to move salary. Now reports are they don't care about moving salary and will get picks? Middle of that to me is that they'll move salary for no picks attached but none back either. Hope I'm underselling but that's just my belief.
Trade 1: Jrue for Klay
Trade 2: Porzingis for Jared Vanderbilt
Trade 3: Hauser into TPE/MLE somewhere
Obviously 1 and 2 need to be bigger trades but figure that out. Dump money elsewhere. I'm not even saying Porzingis to LAL, just make it work so the end result is you get Vandy back. I think those deals are workable through the million multi team deals we all propose every day. That gets us below the tax for this year and puts us on track to be below the tax in 26-27 as well to reset all repeater penalties.
Play out 2025-26 with that reduced roster while Tatum is out. I know everyone wants better and younger players back but I believe that takes us chipping in additional value. Which is fine, except we're paying that value and essentially wasting one year of what those younger and better players bring since Tatum is out. Save your assets, take back the lesser pieces now, and then next year attack assets to Klay and/or Vandy for those better younger players. You can still avoid the tax that way by trading ~$30M of Klay/Vandy money for $30M worth of younger, better players except now you have that all fully aligned with Tatum/Brown/White/Pritchard and reset your taxes.
celticgreenie wrote:Rumors are Jordan Poole is on the market again. Celtics were interested in him before going with the Porzingis trade. I'm not a Poole guy but I wonder if Brad kicks the tires again.
yeleven11 wrote:redslastlaugh wrote:I'm not a subscriber to Marc Stein substack ... but article today from Jake L Fischer is "LOTS (more) around-the-NBA Intel: The Celtics feature prominently in this notes compilation ... as does a significant update out of Philadelphia"
any posters subscribe to Stein and can provide a write up?
I posted it yesterday. Just scroll back some pages
165bows wrote:yeleven11 wrote:redslastlaugh wrote:I'm not a subscriber to Marc Stein substack ... but article today from Jake L Fischer is "LOTS (more) around-the-NBA Intel: The Celtics feature prominently in this notes compilation ... as does a significant update out of Philadelphia"
any posters subscribe to Stein and can provide a write up?
I posted it yesterday. Just scroll back some pages
This is part two post it up bro
yeleven11 wrote:165bows wrote:yeleven11 wrote:
I posted it yesterday. Just scroll back some pages
This is part two post it up bro
It’s the one i posted yesterday lol marc stein is just bumping yesterday’s post