ImageImageImage

Kwame Brown to be waived/pick him up?

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

MoBSTa
Junior
Posts: 263
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Contact:

Kwame Brown to be waived/pick him up? 

Post#61 » by MoBSTa » Sat Feb 2, 2008 8:09 am

Bum, is not the word for Kwame a least a bum has enough motovation to get out of the rain.

Kwame has the tools to be a top player in the NBA. Unfortunatly Kwame is nothing more than a D-league player and may never be anything more.

He has no values on the court or just doesn't value the ball. Nenad Krystic gets off the floor higher and more often than Kwame. Kwame Brown is lazy, and his laziness can be bad in the locker room.

Hands have nothing to do with how bad someone wants the ball and Kwame has had his time to get motivated bye maybe one of the best in the business in Phil Jackson.

Don't be fooled, if Phil couldn't put gas in Kwame he will never run on diesel and Clifford Ray isn't going to make the differance.
EdSkae
Senior
Posts: 558
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

 

Post#62 » by EdSkae » Sat Feb 2, 2008 11:37 am

Bleeding Green wrote:Probably just go back to LA.


I don't think he can go back to LA. I think there was a rule prohibiting put in after Gary Payton went back to Boston.
P2
Banned User
Posts: 4,759
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Location: Beantown

 

Post#63 » by P2 » Sat Feb 2, 2008 11:43 am

Kwame can sign with the Lakers only after March 1, and he wouldn't be eligible for the playoffs in that case. So why would he do that?
Tenbomber
Banned User
Posts: 6,073
And1: 989
Joined: Apr 26, 2005

Re: Kwame Brown to be waived/pick him up? 

Post#64 » by Tenbomber » Sat Feb 2, 2008 7:56 pm

MoBSTa wrote:Don't be fooled, if Phil couldn't put gas in Kwame he will never run on diesel and Clifford Ray isn't going to make the differance.


I suspect you are right....Clifford Ray had the Kadiman here and Kandi never really improved much...

Ray can do wonders with young players with raw talent who want to learn... but you cant get someone to answer the door if theres simply nobody home....Like Kandi, Brown just dosen't seem to have the basketball IQ and the self-driven motivation to work at improvement.

I'd like to see Clifford take a shot at breaking through to him if we could sign him very cheep...but I'm not at all sure it would work out in the end?
User avatar
Egregious Blunder
General Manager
Posts: 8,814
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 10, 2005
Location: LIC, NYC

 

Post#65 » by Egregious Blunder » Sat Feb 2, 2008 8:21 pm

MJ, kobe, and phil jackson couldnt keep him in line
User avatar
cope1
Sophomore
Posts: 148
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 26, 2006

Re: Kwame Brown to be waived/pick him up? 

Post#66 » by cope1 » Sat Feb 2, 2008 9:14 pm

Tenbomber wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I suspect you are right....Clifford Ray had the Kadiman here and Kandi never really improved much...

Ray can do wonders with young players with raw talent who want to learn... but you cant get someone to answer the door if theres simply nobody home....Like Kandi, Brown just dosen't seem to have the basketball IQ and the self-driven motivation to work at improvement.

I'd like to see Clifford take a shot at breaking through to him if we could sign him very cheep...but I'm not at all sure it would work out in the end?


I think the comparison with Kandy Man and Kwame is a good one but Kandy man was older.

If he is a real lost cause, Ainge and company really have to be careful with Chemistry as they have said, bring in a lost cause and give him the few minutes that are left what is it 12? then it may upset the "Ubunto" (sorry I can't remember the exact phrase) they have going....we have to be careful of that...I see bringing him tho if he is on-line 100%....we do need another big body.
"Hope is not a method"......
User avatar
celticfan42487
RealGM
Posts: 27,524
And1: 15,354
Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Location: Billerica, MA
       

 

Post#67 » by celticfan42487 » Sat Feb 2, 2008 9:52 pm

Bottom line it's what's best for the Celtics. Not to see if the kid has a future in teh league. Not to see if he's motivated. It's if he can be our backup Center.

1) Is Brown> Injury Pollard?

We're not going to keep the kid for more then the end of this year because some rebuilding team will offer him more then vet min. But for this year there is a back-up Center role and the only question is: does Kwame bring enough to the backup center position to warrant a vet min contract?

I say he does, especially since we've been playing 30 games without a back-up Center because Pollard is hurt.
Image
Rocky5000
Analyst
Posts: 3,386
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2008

 

Post#68 » by Rocky5000 » Sat Feb 2, 2008 10:23 pm

If others are considering bringing in Birdman, why not Kwame? Their stats aren't that different.

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/chris_andersen/
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/kwame_brown/

As much as I love Perk as far as starting C goes, he has to be in the bottom 4 or 5 of the NBA. I think over the offseason he was rated dead last. I think Perk is a better defender than Perkins but not by much. Kwame is much more mobile than Perkins is, and a better offensive player. If Kwame hadn't been picked as highly and hadn't been given such a large contract, he wouldn't be getting the attention he does now. If he's looked at as a role player instead of a franchise savior I think he has a lot more value.
DelMonte West
Veteran
Posts: 2,945
And1: 685
Joined: Jan 10, 2006

Re: Kwame Brown to be waived/pick him up? 

Post#69 » by DelMonte West » Sat Feb 2, 2008 11:13 pm

Jimmy103 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Jordan tried to get the best out of Kwame and it backfired painfully...

Maybe KG can do a better job. Bring the big boy on board!!!


If Kwame had a hard time with Jordan and the Laker fans, I shudder to think what could happen to what's left of his self-esteem if his play pissed off Garnett.

Everyone wants to see this kid rise from the ashes, but I'm not sure KG's the best guy to be in your corner if you're infamous for your lack of confidence and desire.
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,063
And1: 9,042
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

 

Post#70 » by ParticleMan » Sun Feb 3, 2008 3:13 am

canman1971 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Come on Particle. He is not a good player. This is what I am talking about. You are hoping he "realizes" his talent/height and hoping he'll be motivated. He has done nothing in his career to suggest so. Now, don't get me wrong, if we signed him for the min. I certainly wouldn't care, but he would not contribute at all. He is Kandi part II.


He is not a good player but we're talking about a 3rd string center here. He can play some pretty good D, and he is a legit 7 feet. That's enough for me. I don't expect him to "realize" anything. I just want him to play at the level he played for most of his career. I'm not expecting any miracles, Clifford Ray or no.

I don't know about the whole Kandi comparison. Kwame I don't recall has ever had motivation problems. Kobe went out of his way to say that Kwame was a good guy. He isn't a locker room problem. He doesn't get in trouble with the law. He works hard, he tries. He's just not very good, at least for a #1 pick. But that draft was long ago, forget it. What's important now is whether he can help us.

Imagine it's game 7 of the finals, Perk and KG are out with fouls, Pollard is injured as always, and someone has to come in to guard TD on the final play. Do you want Powe? Or Baby? Or Scal? Or would you rather have a legit center who is a solid defender and shotblocker?
User avatar
MVP16
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,342
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 05, 2006

 

Post#71 » by MVP16 » Sun Feb 3, 2008 3:22 am

ParticleMan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Imagine it's game 7 of the finals, Perk and KG are out with fouls, Pollard is injured as always, and someone has to come in to guard TD on the final play. Do you want Powe? Or Baby? Or Scal? Or would you rather have a legit center who is a solid defender and shotblocker?


1. Your assumption is based on the fact that 3 players are out for one reason or another. Pollard would be playing right now if we needed him. But why play him when we can develop Powe/Big Baby and he has a lingering ankle problem. Having KG and Perk foul is also very unlikely. Using this kind of logic, we need another player at each position since there's a minute possibility that multiple players will foul out/be injured.

2. Powe has played very good defense and wouldn't do much worse then Kwame IMO. Powe already knows our defensive schemes and with Kwame's IQ level, I'm not sure he'll be able to master them this year. Either way, whether it's Kwame or Powe on Duncan, neither of them is stopping him one on one. It would be a team defensive effort.
Tenbomber
Banned User
Posts: 6,073
And1: 989
Joined: Apr 26, 2005

 

Post#72 » by Tenbomber » Sun Feb 3, 2008 3:13 pm

ParticleMan wrote:What's important now is whether he can help us.

Imagine it's game 7 of the finals, Perk and KG are out with fouls, Pollard is injured as always, and someone has to come in to guard TD on the final play. Do you want Powe? Or Baby? Or Scal? Or would you rather have a legit center who is a solid defender and shotblocker?


Hmmmm....thats a good question!

Actually, I would rather have Brown in there than Pollard... from what I've been able to see of Pollard's play.

We have a roster spot open, so I'm not opposed to signing Brown up if the price is right and he's willin.....(even if it ends up that he is no more than a situation player like you described).....then again too, there's always that chance that Kwame would miraculously find himself, playing alongside Kevin?....

Worth a shot I guess!....I take my chances with him in situations like these..

Guess theres a part of me that would love to see a guy like Brown do well and be a difference maker here in Boston....if for no other reason than he was booed in LA....
ShowtimeFan
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,467
And1: 63
Joined: Oct 07, 2007
Location: Floor seats next to Jack

 

Post#73 » by ShowtimeFan » Mon Feb 4, 2008 5:50 am

Bleeding Green wrote:Probably just go back to LA.


No, No, No, If you guys really want/need him go right ahead.

The Lakers/Kwame experiment is officially over..

or if you want Mihm back, just give us a call...
magee
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,417
And1: 2,394
Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Location: San Diego, CA

 

Post#74 » by magee » Mon Feb 4, 2008 7:21 am

He's worth it if he comes at the vets minimum. Absolutely worth it. Anyone who says no to him is an idiot. He would immediately give this team more depth because KG wouldn't have to play 40 minutes against teams who have schlubs as bigs like Charlotte (aside from Emeka Okafor).
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

 

Post#75 » by sully00 » Mon Feb 4, 2008 10:41 pm

Obviously if they waive him he is someone you have to take a look at, I just hope they don't you have to give the Kwame/Darko frontcourt a chance to dominate.
hiphop1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,086
And1: 32
Joined: Aug 08, 2005
Location: hudson nh

 

Post#76 » by hiphop1 » Tue Feb 5, 2008 5:29 pm

sully00 wrote:Obviously if they waive him he is someone you have to take a look at, I just hope they don't you have to give the Kwame/Darko frontcourt a chance to dominate.



The Elbusto Frontcourt!
Free your mind and your a** will follow
P2
Banned User
Posts: 4,759
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Location: Beantown

 

Post#77 » by P2 » Tue Feb 5, 2008 5:37 pm

Please close this thread. Kwame will not receive a buyout, here's why:

http://www.nba.com/grizzlies/features/k ... 80204.html

Return to Boston Celtics