NY/Bos trade idea
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
- celticfan42487
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,526
- And1: 15,365
- Joined: Jul 22, 2005
- Location: Billerica, MA
-
theman wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I thought Lee was a decent defender.
Nope he's pretty bad, think Leon Powe without the intensity. His defense just get's overshadow by the disgusting defense of others like Crawford.
I can't believe trading TA and Perkins in a deal with NY would make you think there was any way we'd come out on the better end of it.
If your going to trade for post offense at least get the guy who can score in the post and rebound in Randolph. Hell even beign lazy he can do okay on our team with his decent range. He'd fail to fullfill his potential but it wouldn't hurt as poorly as The Big Dissapointment Curry There's a reason why Curry didn't get a contract offered near the one he signed with NY. And that's because dispite having no heart as a player in real life he has a potential bad ticker to boot.

- hickfromfrenchlick
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,936
- And1: 9,364
- Joined: Mar 22, 2006
- Location: BROOKLYN
-
Did anybody watch the game? Curry doesn't even get any PT for the Knicks anymore.
For a seven footer, he's a horrendous rebounder. And he averages less than half a block a game.
He's Mark Blount with better post moves. He's a bust.
I like Lee. But why would we give up so much depth? No way.
The one guy that cold help our team would be Crawford. Yeah, he looks like a gunner but that's because the Knicks stink. He could be pretty good backing up both guard spots.
For a seven footer, he's a horrendous rebounder. And he averages less than half a block a game.
He's Mark Blount with better post moves. He's a bust.
I like Lee. But why would we give up so much depth? No way.
The one guy that cold help our team would be Crawford. Yeah, he looks like a gunner but that's because the Knicks stink. He could be pretty good backing up both guard spots.
