ImageImageImage

No ref ever makes that kind of foul call....

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

PPAW4Life
Banned User
Posts: 1,546
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 23, 2007

No ref ever makes that kind of foul call.... 

Post#1 » by PPAW4Life » Sat May 3, 2008 3:08 am

....to foul out a player at that point in the game.
User avatar
GWVan
Analyst
Posts: 3,022
And1: 2,549
Joined: Dec 12, 2002
Location: The world's most famous beach
 

 

Post#2 » by GWVan » Sat May 3, 2008 3:19 am

+1
Full of sound and fury; signifying nothing
Kefa461
RealGM
Posts: 12,530
And1: 430
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Location: Member of Celtic Nation since '64
       

 

Post#3 » by Kefa461 » Sat May 3, 2008 3:23 am

Well you saw it tonight......against the C's.... 8)
WE ARE CELTIC NATION
17 TITLES, ON TO #18.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,694
And1: 9,531
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

 

Post#4 » by bstein14 » Sat May 3, 2008 3:23 am

Pierce had his arms around the player from behind.

Why do that?

That's so stupid.

He practically was asking for a foul call.
User avatar
Collinto
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,601
And1: 25
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#5 » by Collinto » Sat May 3, 2008 3:26 am

They shouldn't have been loosing at that point anyway...
User avatar
SonicYouth34
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,575
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 25, 2008
Contact:

 

Post#6 » by SonicYouth34 » Sat May 3, 2008 3:31 am

I agree that normally doesn't happen, I though we had a veteran group of officials that coached many finals...


bstein14, I love that signature :clap:
Celtics! Horah!
Celtics! Horah!
Celtics! Horah!
1,2,3 Ubuntu.
MaxwellSmart
General Manager
Posts: 7,580
And1: 2,326
Joined: Jun 17, 2007

 

Post#7 » by MaxwellSmart » Sat May 3, 2008 3:34 am

bstein14 wrote:Pierce had his arms around the player from behind.

Why do that?

That's so stupid.

He practically was asking for a foul call.


if you watch the ENTIRE play---Zaza had Pierce in a headlock just before PP wrapped his arm around him.
PPAW4Life
Banned User
Posts: 1,546
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 23, 2007

 

Post#8 » by PPAW4Life » Sat May 3, 2008 3:38 am

bstein14 wrote:Pierce had his arms around the player from behind.

Why do that?

That's so stupid.

He practically was asking for a foul call.


It doesn't matter because Pierce didn't create any advantage with that arm around ZaZa.

And in reality ZaZa was still in control of that space.

The ref CAN make that call if ZaZa was flung to the ground by Perice because of that arm.
NickHexum
Sophomore
Posts: 184
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 13, 2006

 

Post#9 » by NickHexum » Sat May 3, 2008 3:39 am

despite this call and Pierce being gone, they still should have pulled this out. Garnett had four consecutive plays within 10ft of the basket to shoot the ball and he passed each one up...way to "be the man"... why do you think Allen took the three when down by two rather then passing to KG...he knows KG doesn't want the ball :)
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,596
And1: 8,074
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

 

Post#10 » by Celtics_Champs » Sat May 3, 2008 3:40 am

MaxwellSmart wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



if you watch the ENTIRE play---Zaza had Pierce in a headlock just before PP wrapped his arm around him.


Yep, they were both battling. You really cannot make that kind of call in this big a game.
GregB
RealGM
Posts: 11,923
And1: 2,999
Joined: Sep 21, 2004
Location: South Shore, MA
     

 

Post#11 » by GregB » Sat May 3, 2008 3:42 am

I was that upset with that foul. It was the fact they didnt make the call on whoever pulled down Perkins going for the offensive rebound after the Ray Allen missed 3.
Rip2137
Analyst
Posts: 3,317
And1: 228
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

 

Post#12 » by Rip2137 » Sat May 3, 2008 3:44 am

Its basketball. refs make calls. Refs made the call on Pierce obviously charging Josh Smith on a break, and you have to live with it. Pierce, technically did foul zaza. It was ticky tack, but there was nothing they could do after one ref called the loose ball foul (before knowing that the shot was going in). Its a tough call, but you know...thats basketball. Tough calls went against both teams.
MaxwellSmart
General Manager
Posts: 7,580
And1: 2,326
Joined: Jun 17, 2007

 

Post#13 » by MaxwellSmart » Sat May 3, 2008 3:45 am

GregB wrote:I was that upset with that foul. It was the fact they didnt make the call on whoever pulled down Perkins going for the offensive rebound after the Ray Allen missed 3.


Right on the money!.....I saw the same thing----All the NO CALLS on Atlanta killed us tonight====but we still should have won.
_BBIB_
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,622
And1: 16
Joined: May 23, 2007

 

Post#14 » by _BBIB_ » Sat May 3, 2008 3:48 am

The Celtics got away with NINE Loose Ball Fouls in the FIRST HALF. Something they have gotten away with all series.

Paul Pierce has gotten away with charging his way through defenders ALL SERIES.

Josh Childress has been fouled numerous times on the baseline with no calls.

The Celts get the advantage of touch fouls while BS charges go against Hawks all series.


THis officiating has been overwhelmingly in favor of the Celtics and I shudder to think what type of calls the Celtics will get in a game 7 in Boston.


IOW, STFU
MaxwellSmart
General Manager
Posts: 7,580
And1: 2,326
Joined: Jun 17, 2007

 

Post#15 » by MaxwellSmart » Sat May 3, 2008 4:03 am

_BBIB_ wrote:The Celtics got away with NINE Loose Ball Fouls in the FIRST HALF. Something they have gotten away with all series.

Paul Pierce has gotten away with charging his way through defenders ALL SERIES.

Josh Childress has been fouled numerous times on the baseline with no calls.

The Celts get the advantage of touch fouls while BS charges go against Hawks all series.


THis officiating has been overwhelmingly in favor of the Celtics and I shudder to think what type of calls the Celtics will get in a game 7 in Boston.


IOW, STFU


you are WRONG....go away!
User avatar
The_Floydian
Freshman
Posts: 95
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 03, 2008

 

Post#16 » by The_Floydian » Sat May 3, 2008 4:12 am

:clap:
dsorc
Pro Prospect
Posts: 914
And1: 91
Joined: Apr 22, 2007
 

 

Post#17 » by dsorc » Sat May 3, 2008 4:42 am

_BBIB_ wrote:The Celtics got away with NINE Loose Ball Fouls in the FIRST HALF. Something they have gotten away with all series.

Paul Pierce has gotten away with charging his way through defenders ALL SERIES.

Josh Childress has been fouled numerous times on the baseline with no calls.

The Celts get the advantage of touch fouls while BS charges go against Hawks all series.


THis officiating has been overwhelmingly in favor of the Celtics and I shudder to think what type of calls the Celtics will get in a game 7 in Boston.


IOW, STFU

First on the charges, I'm pretty certain the Celts are the best team in the league at drawing them. Second, if the refs are favoring the Celts so much then why are the Hawks having such lopsided FT differentials. Even if you want to argue that slashing should get you more FTs there's no way that explains a +20 FT differential.
User avatar
Datruth345
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,903
And1: 442
Joined: Nov 25, 2005
 

 

Post#18 » by Datruth345 » Sat May 3, 2008 4:45 am

bad call
"...That, Mr. James, is etched in stone.” - Bill Russell
User avatar
The_Floydian
Freshman
Posts: 95
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 03, 2008

 

Post#19 » by The_Floydian » Sat May 3, 2008 5:01 am

Seriously, if you want to talk about bending the rules in favor of one team, Garnett should have been suspended for pushing the ref in game 4. If it had been reversed, Zaza would have been gone.

Return to Boston Celtics