Joselo16 wrote:Now how if Fisher >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rondo that much better? The only thing Fisher is better at is shooting and being a good flopper (oh and experience which is overrated). Rondo is faster, has better defense, better rebounder, better passer, he's younger and has the intangibles (steals, blocks etc). If Fisher's shot isn't falling he is useless and Kobe takes on more of a load or they bring in Jordan Farmar. Fisher is what they call a 2 in a 1's body!
Experience is overated? I beg to differ.
Not to mention that Rondo has been VERY inconsistant throughout the playoffs...Do you think a player with no experience and who has already been very inconsistant in the playoffs shows that experience is overated?
or maybe Rondo is just overated? (Which i don't think so...he is a good defender and gets his temates invovled...i think he should look for his shot a little more often...but i think its the experience factor in why he is doing pretty bad)
I dunno, i think the Lakers have a huge edge with Fisher....
And to the other guy, i'm not a troll, i have been on topic with my posts and have been honest with my posts and am not just saying "boston sucks lolz, kobe is the best lolz, scalabrine is the best player lolz"
I mean i don't think im trolling, if i am...then i apoligize for that...Not looking to start flame wars...just here to talk basketball