ImageImageImage

Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
Tricky Ricky
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: HAVERHILL MA

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#21 » by Tricky Ricky » Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:21 pm

Lakers have 14 Im willing to deal with it now
Quote of the year
MyInsatiableOne wrote:Did we just seriously post Danny's personal address and phone # on the board? :o
User avatar
seccom
Junior
Posts: 280
And1: 52
Joined: Oct 17, 2007
       

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#22 » by seccom » Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:08 pm

MyInsatiableOne wrote:
celtics792244 wrote:I remember back in the 80's a friend of mine (Laker fan) had one of the cartoon T-shirts (like the ones the players where wearing on the VICTORY(!) parade) of the Lakers after they won it in '88. It had showed the players holding basketballs with the years in which LA won it. IT STARTED WITH 1972!!!

THAT franchise is trying to conjure up false championships nowadays, because it sure as hell didn't acknowledge them before.

BOSTON CELTICS
2008 NBA CHAMPIONS
COMING TO AGE: THE CHASE FOR BANNER 18


Exactly. I remember as a kid in the 1980s hearing about the Lakers going for their "5th" championship, their "6th", etc. The Lakers didn't even hang a banner in LA acknowledging the Minny ones until toward the end of the Shaq-Kobe era. If the entire fanbase and franchise didn't acknowledge it until then, why should anyone else?


Are you a fan of LA Lakers? How did you know the entire fanbase did not acknowledge the Minn Lakers.

I always believe Lakers should retire Milken's number since I first time I read about the Minn Lakers in 1975.

Two wrongs does not make it right. It is wrong for Jerry Buss not to acknowledge the Minn Lakers until they re-hang the banners. It is also wrong for the Boston fans like you who did not want to acknowledge the achivement of the Milken and the Minn Lakers.
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#23 » by MyInsatiableOne » Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:23 pm

^^I'm certainly no Laker fan, as a Celtic fan I'm a lifelong Laker-hater, but I obviously know more about them than you do to know it's MIKAN and not MILKEN!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: @ Laker "fans"
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
celtics792244
Rookie
Posts: 1,061
And1: 839
Joined: Sep 12, 2007

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#24 » by celtics792244 » Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:14 pm

Can we count my old YMCA basketball teams championships with the Celtics as well? We were nicknamed the 'Celtics', so using La La logic it counts, don't it. 19 championships and counting!

Point is, YOUR petty little franchise did NOT acknowledge them until recently. This is what makes your franchise look weak. So weak, that it makes Pau and Sasha (love the name! Can you guys draft someone named Fi-Fi in this draft to make it all complete) look like He-Man in comparison.

BTW, I LOVE all the Laker talk about their upcomming 'dynasty'. IF WE HAD BYNUM, blah, blah, blah. Like Bynum was going to help them overcome a 39 point thrashing. Man, I still can't even name or pronounce their 5th starter. I refer to him as the dirty guy whose last name starts with an 'R'.

Don't they realize that we have atleast another 2 years, then it is Cleveland for the next 5-8 years.

BOSTON CELTICS
2008 NBA CHAMPIONS
COMING TO AGE: THE CHASE FOR BANNER 18
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#25 » by MyInsatiableOne » Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:10 pm

^^How dare any of us Celtics fans question the greatness of Kareem Abdul-JaBynum Chamberlain and his incredible 40-50 game body of work in doubting the looming Laker dynasty...

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
User avatar
mr_sunshine
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,430
And1: 482
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#26 » by mr_sunshine » Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:37 pm

^^Hahaha. So true man... my friend who is a "Lakers fan" (he didn't talk about them until this year) has a raging hardon for Bynum. His fantasy team was named Bynum is the Next Shaq even, and he's used the "...if we had Bynum..." line several times since the finals ended. Silly Lakers fans!

Anyhow, back to the topic at hand. Either way the Celtics have more 'Ships, so personally I don't give a ****.
User avatar
seccom
Junior
Posts: 280
And1: 52
Joined: Oct 17, 2007
       

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#27 » by seccom » Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:49 pm

celtics792244 wrote:Can we count my old YMCA basketball teams championships with the Celtics as well? We were nicknamed the 'Celtics', so using La La logic it counts, don't it. 19 championships and counting!

Point is, YOUR petty little franchise did NOT acknowledge them until recently. This is what makes your franchise look weak. So weak, that it makes Pau and Sasha (love the name! Can you guys draft someone named Fi-Fi in this draft to make it all complete) look like He-Man in comparison.

BTW, I LOVE all the Laker talk about their upcomming 'dynasty'. IF WE HAD BYNUM, blah, blah, blah. Like Bynum was going to help them overcome a 39 point thrashing. Man, I still can't even name or pronounce their 5th starter. I refer to him as the dirty guy whose last name starts with an 'R'.

Don't they realize that we have atleast another 2 years, then it is Cleveland for the next 5-8 years.

BOSTON CELTICS
2008 NBA CHAMPIONS
COMING TO AGE: THE CHASE FOR BANNER 18


At the end, it is just trash talk. Isn't it? It had nothing to do with right and wrong, a true sense of history.

What about New Orleans Hornets, Utah Jazz, NJ Nets, LA Clippers, and soon OKC Supersonics?
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#28 » by MyInsatiableOne » Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:05 pm

Those teams suck! It really is amazing how few NBA teams have more than 1 title:

Celtics: 17
LA Lakers: 9
Bulls: 6
Minn. Lakers: 5
Spurs: 4
Knicks, Rockets, 76ers: 2
A bunch of defunct teams with 1 or 2

Crazy.
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
Athanacropolis
Analyst
Posts: 3,321
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#29 » by Athanacropolis » Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:30 pm

Kareem Abdul JaBynum Chamberlain O'Neal is the next George Milken.
daveisceltics
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,457
And1: 517
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Location: South Boston
       

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#30 » by daveisceltics » Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:54 pm

The Lakers won the other 5 before the shot clock era..They don't count.
I already said this, it's like saying the Cleveland Browns won 9 Super Bowl's
wbc17
Sophomore
Posts: 176
And1: 16
Joined: Apr 16, 2007
   

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#31 » by wbc17 » Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:02 pm

That's why we call 'em Fakers, right?

Boston Celtics: 17
Minneapolis Lakers: 5
Los Angeles Fakers: 9
Prophet_C
Starter
Posts: 2,108
And1: 100
Joined: Aug 15, 2007
Location: Maine
       

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#32 » by Prophet_C » Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:12 pm

MyInsatiableOne wrote:^^I'm certainly no Laker fan, as a Celtic fan I'm a lifelong Laker-hater, but I obviously know more about them than you do to know it's MIKAN and not MILKEN!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: @ Laker "fans"


:rofl:
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#33 » by MyInsatiableOne » Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:17 pm

Athanacropolis wrote:Kareem Abdul JaBynum Chamberlain O'Neal is the next George Milken.


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,672
And1: 31,903
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 14 

Post#34 » by Dr Aki » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:57 pm

daveisceltics wrote:The Lakers won the other 5 before the shot clock era..They don't count.
I already said this, it's like saying the Cleveland Browns won 9 Super Bowl's


they introduced the shot clock BECAUSE of mikan and the lakers

mikan forced the first major rule change in the NBA

its like saying uruguay's world cups dont count because of the offside rules in those days

but yes, u would have to annotate the lakers with LA, everytime you say lakers because the lakers have won 14
Image
bruno sundov
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,777
And1: 13
Joined: Jan 03, 2007
Location: Leftcoast of the USA

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 14 

Post#35 » by bruno sundov » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:01 pm

Akiho wrote:
daveisceltics wrote:The Lakers won the other 5 before the shot clock era..They don't count.
I already said this, it's like saying the Cleveland Browns won 9 Super Bowl's


they introduced the shot clock BECAUSE of mikan and the lakers

mikan forced the first major rule change in the NBA

its like saying uruguay's world cups dont count because of the offside rules in those days

but yes, u would have to annotate the lakers with LA, everytime you say lakers because the lakers have won 14


Uruagay and offsides, what the hell are talking about? Rugby or soccer? Probably cricket. Anyways the championships dont count for the LA lakers because they were won in SODA!!! Get it.
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Celtics: 17, Lakers: 9 

Post#36 » by MyInsatiableOne » Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:02 pm

^^It's not that so much that if the team themselves didn't even acknowledge those titles until a few years ago when it became convenient for them to, why should the rest of us?

Return to Boston Celtics