Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
- MyInsatiableOne
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,319
- And1: 180
- Joined: Mar 25, 2005
- Location: Midwest via New England
- Contact:
-
Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
I still want to see what WiltKarAndrew JaBynum-Chamberlain is doing come March or April before I make any predictions regarding their chances vs the C's and their defense...even with Gasol next to him, Bynum is the lone tower since Gasol is softer than a roll of rain-soaked toilet paper...
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
- TonyMontana
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,726
- And1: 398
- Joined: Apr 27, 2006
- Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
-
Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
MyInsatiableOne wrote:I still want to see what WiltKarAndrew JaBynum-Chamberlain is doing come March or April before I make any predictions regarding their chances vs the C's and their defense...even with Gasol next to him, Bynum is the lone tower since Gasol is softer than a roll of rain-soaked toilet paper...


Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
- MyInsatiableOne
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,319
- And1: 180
- Joined: Mar 25, 2005
- Location: Midwest via New England
- Contact:
-
Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
^^The Lakers D is indeed better, but no thanks to Pau. He's a very good offensive player but a total cupcake in the physicality department...
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
- DEEP3CL
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,899
- And1: 3,207
- Joined: Jul 23, 2005
- Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
-
Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
Hey you know when it dries out it's hard and stiff right ! Maybe that'll help him absorb some contact just a tad !MyInsatiableOne wrote:Bynum is the lone tower since Gasol is softer than a roll of rain-soaked toilet paper...

VETERAN LAKERS FAN
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
- Dr Aki
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,682
- And1: 31,913
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
MyInsatiableOne wrote:^^The Lakers D is indeed better, but no thanks to Pau. He's a very good offensive player but a total cupcake in the physicality department...
pau might be an average defender, but he still knows he's 7 feet tall and he knows how to use that to his advantage on both ends of the floor
at the very least, he knows how to get hit in the face, its amazing how many fouls his face draws...

Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,722
- And1: 9,508
- Joined: Jul 10, 2004
Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
I haven't seen enough of the Lakers to know for sure, but when you see a team winning by 13 ppg then you know they are playing defense. Total ppg doesn't really tell the story which is why Pete's point about pace is so true. Last year we led the league in ppg differential and the year before it was San Antonio.
There is no denying that the Lakers got a lot better on paper since Finals. There is no denying that at least on paper we added no significant players and lost 2 key ones in Posey and PJ.
When we play each other we will see which is stronger - our defense or their offense - and that will determine who is better. The Lakers defense is probably good enough versus our offense right now. Can we stop them like we did last year? Will Ariza guarding Pierce change the dynamics of this matchup?
There is no denying that the Lakers got a lot better on paper since Finals. There is no denying that at least on paper we added no significant players and lost 2 key ones in Posey and PJ.
When we play each other we will see which is stronger - our defense or their offense - and that will determine who is better. The Lakers defense is probably good enough versus our offense right now. Can we stop them like we did last year? Will Ariza guarding Pierce change the dynamics of this matchup?
"I think the criticism's stupid," Stevens said. "So I don't care. I'm with Jaylen (Brown) on that. Those two had achieved more than most 25 and 26 year olds ever had. I'd rather be in the mix and have my guts ripped out than suck."
Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,785
- And1: 2,610
- Joined: Aug 15, 2004
-
Re: Why we're gonna beat the Lakers for #18
I watched the lakers game against Phoenix and while their defense is better than last year it is not even close to the defense we play. Or the cavs for that matter. They are still winning with their offense, IMO.
And I agree with Sam. LA is better than last year, they added Bynum and Ariza. We OTOH lost Posey and PJ. We were clearly better last year, I expected a win in the finals, this season it is much closer. But I am sure Danny will improve this team by the time playoffs start, so we will see how we look then.
And I agree with Sam. LA is better than last year, they added Bynum and Ariza. We OTOH lost Posey and PJ. We were clearly better last year, I expected a win in the finals, this season it is much closer. But I am sure Danny will improve this team by the time playoffs start, so we will see how we look then.