I think the primary role of Marbury, and to a lesser extent Moore, is to come in at the end of the 1st and push the tempo. House/Marbury/Moore added to whatever else need to force teams to go to their bench and not get away with letting other teams starters especially their bigs stay on the floor and anchor the offense.
If Scal and Tony get healthy we are actually going to have 12 rotation caliber players we need to use that depth to our advantage, it also is going to be somewhat unexpected as teams will look for the grind with Boston not the up quick.
Obviously Marbury is not know for getting up and down but he is certainly capable of it and with Moore running the floor with House pulling up it should be a weapon.
Do you think we can we go small with Marbury?
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Re: Do you think we can we go small with Marbury?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 28,105
- And1: 7,738
- Joined: Jan 08, 2004
- Location: Providence, RI
-