ImageImageImage

$50 Mil for Bargnani??

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

GuyClinch
RealGM
Posts: 13,345
And1: 1,478
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

Re: $50 Mil for Bargnani?? 

Post#21 » by GuyClinch » Thu Jul 9, 2009 5:10 pm

So is Bargnani. You just have never seen him play. He's no allstar, but he's had games where he was the best player in the game. He's just very inconsistent, but by all means, the talent is definitely there.


One guy can't shoot - the other can't rebound. I don't see that its clear which guy is better. I lean towards Barg because he will grab a few boards simply because he is tall. But V is an offensive nothing..
UGA Hayes
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,223
And1: 19,913
Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Location: real gm

Re: $50 Mil for Bargnani?? 

Post#22 » by UGA Hayes » Thu Jul 9, 2009 5:23 pm

Varajao is pretty good IMO, fans always underate mediocre scorers in favor of good scorers.
User avatar
tombattor
General Manager
Posts: 8,662
And1: 807
Joined: Nov 11, 2003
       

Re: $50 Mil for Bargnani?? 

Post#23 » by tombattor » Thu Jul 9, 2009 6:06 pm

UGA Hayes wrote:Varajao is pretty good IMO, fans always underate mediocre scorers in favor of good scorers.

I think people know what Varejao does for the Cavs. He's the guy that does everything you don't see in the box score very well. Playing good D, setting screens which free up shooters, etc. But I wasn't saying that Varejao is bad. I was just saying that Bargnani is better than people think.

Return to Boston Celtics