ImageImageImage

We need to cut the fat off this roster

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
cfan79
RealGM
Posts: 15,784
And1: 74
Joined: Sep 27, 2003
Location: Haverhill, MA

Re: We need to cut the fat off this roster 

Post#21 » by cfan79 » Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:35 pm

basketballnj21 wrote:Why would you get rid of Eddie House and keep Starbury.


Marbury is an underrated player. He can do multiple things whereas House can do only one thing. Marbury's defense was better then I thought originally. He has to get his groove back though. He seemed like he was not scoring like his old self last season. I don't know what was up with him. But its the main reason he's not getting any offers.
Image
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,071
And1: 9,074
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

Re: We need to cut the fat off this roster 

Post#22 » by ParticleMan » Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:38 pm

cfan79 wrote:
basketballnj21 wrote:Why would you get rid of Eddie House and keep Starbury.


Marbury is an underrated player.


LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Marbury sucks. He had 3 months to prove he doesn't suck, but he sucks. He isn't underrated. He doesn't need to get his groove back, because he doesn't have a groove anymore. House can do only 1 thing, which is 1 more than Marbury can at this point. That's why he's valuable.
User avatar
cfan79
RealGM
Posts: 15,784
And1: 74
Joined: Sep 27, 2003
Location: Haverhill, MA

Re: We need to cut the fat off this roster 

Post#23 » by cfan79 » Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:42 pm

ParticleMan wrote:
LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Marbury sucks. He had 3 months to prove he doesn't suck, but he sucks. He isn't underrated. He doesn't need to get his groove back, because he doesn't have a groove anymore. House can do only 1 thing, which is 1 more than Marbury can at this point. That's why he's valuable.


Sure he was drastically overpaid and unrightfully called a franchise player, but look at his career, he's actually started on teams. Many of us didn't even want Eddie to use his player option and come back. There's no comparison between the two.
Image
User avatar
Bad-Thoma
Head Coach
Posts: 7,183
And1: 10,035
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Location: Still riding proud on the C's bandwagon

Re: We need to cut the fat off this roster 

Post#24 » by Bad-Thoma » Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:04 pm

cfan79 wrote:
ParticleMan wrote:
LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Marbury sucks. He had 3 months to prove he doesn't suck, but he sucks. He isn't underrated. He doesn't need to get his groove back, because he doesn't have a groove anymore. House can do only 1 thing, which is 1 more than Marbury can at this point. That's why he's valuable.


Sure he was drastically overpaid and unrightfully called a franchise player, but look at his career, he's actually started on teams. Many of us didn't even want Eddie to use his player option and come back. There's no comparison between the two.


Your right, there is no comparison. House produced during the regular season and Marbs was just sort of there. Marbs may get it back and may not, you'd think after 3 months he would have showed something though. Of the two I'll take Eddie back any day.
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,071
And1: 9,074
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

Re: We need to cut the fat off this roster 

Post#25 » by ParticleMan » Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:14 pm

cfan79 wrote:Sure he was drastically overpaid and unrightfully called a franchise player, but look at his career, he's actually started on teams. Many of us didn't even want Eddie to use his player option and come back. There's no comparison between the two.


so let's give him a freakin lifetime achievement award. yeah of course he was once a better player than Eddie House. so was Sam Jones, but that doesn't mean I want him on the C's next year either.

it's a what have you done for me lately league. marbury hasn't done anything lately but stink.

Return to Boston Celtics