ImageImageImage

Welcome back Starbury?

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
Spin Move
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,103
And1: 2,051
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
     

Re: Welcome back Starbury? 

Post#21 » by Spin Move » Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:14 pm

Not sure that source is 100 reliable, but if we bring starbury back its a good thing are rotation is really starting to take a nice shape, especially if we can bring baby back and get anything out of giddens or walker though it looks like at least 1 of them will be going in the Daniels deal along wth TA or scal

PG Rondo(1)/Starbury(2)/House (3)
SG Ray(4)/MD(5)/House
SF Pierce(6)/MD/?
PF KG(7)/Sheed(8)/?
C Perk (9)/Sheed/?

In flux: baby-unsigned, (Scal/TA/Pruit/Walker/Giddens)-mentioned in possible trade for MD, lester-no contract. either way if we trade Scal/JR for MD and Resign davis we have a really nice rotation, enough room to resign powe at the min and let him heal and enough room to sign developmental player regardless, i would like one more true C on the roster.
bc legends
Banned User
Posts: 2,843
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 02, 2009
Location: Southern Cal

Re: Welcome back Starbury? 

Post#22 » by bc legends » Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:29 pm

Avalanche wrote:I've said all along that with a full training camp and off-season with the team, there is a huge gap between what he brings and the other available players for the same price

maybe this is why they are trying to sign and trade for Quis rather then sign him, so they can offer steph a little bit more

I understand why people are hesitant to keep him, but i think its the best option

we'll see i guess


+1111111111111
If he shows any glimpse of the old Starbury we will have the best bench in the league(after re-signing BBD).
GuyClinch
RealGM
Posts: 13,345
And1: 1,478
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

Re: Welcome back Starbury? 

Post#23 » by GuyClinch » Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:52 pm

If you click on that link it says account suspended. That's really an unreliable source even for the internet. <g>
User avatar
JHTruth
RealGM
Posts: 14,251
And1: 2,511
Joined: Jul 02, 2003
Location: The Big Three are Back..

Re: Welcome back Starbury? 

Post#24 » by JHTruth » Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:56 pm

GuyClinch wrote:If you click on that link it says account suspended. That's really an unreliable source even for the internet. <g>


LOL. It was working fine earlier. I think some folks over at Cblog are trying to twitter the guy I think.

Nonetheless, it's not a stretch to think Marbs would be back. Where else would he play in the NBA that makes as much sense? No one's going to give him more cash. Europe? Come on, he would never go over there. Where else could the c's turn to get that talent at back-up PG? Of course MArbs is coming back..
User avatar
TheMartian
General Manager
Posts: 8,917
And1: 6,720
Joined: Oct 13, 2004
 

Re: Welcome back Starbury? 

Post#25 » by TheMartian » Wed Jul 22, 2009 12:03 am

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the guy from nes247 said Starbury was going to sign for the bi-annual exception? Isn't that the same as the LLE? What do we use for Daniels then if a S&T doesn't work out with Indiana?

Can't confirm if he said BAE cause his account just got suspended.
User avatar
Zin5
Starter
Posts: 2,453
And1: 328
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Location: CT, USA
       

Re: Welcome back Starbury? 

Post#26 » by Zin5 » Wed Jul 22, 2009 12:58 am

Garbage rumor, account suspended, just made up to try to give his site some traffic. Move along.
#loveboston
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,071
And1: 9,074
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

Re: Welcome back Starbury? 

Post#27 » by ParticleMan » Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:14 am

LOL Ainge has more sense than to give him the LLE. he isn't even worth the vet min.
sam_I_am
RealGM
Posts: 16,722
And1: 9,508
Joined: Jul 10, 2004

Re: Welcome back Starbury? 

Post#28 » by sam_I_am » Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:36 am

Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Starbury suck a$$ last season? Who cares if he signs or not. He was overrated when young and a washed up overrated guy is irrelevant to this incredible roster.
"I think the criticism's stupid," Stevens said. "So I don't care. I'm with Jaylen (Brown) on that. Those two had achieved more than most 25 and 26 year olds ever had. I'd rather be in the mix and have my guts ripped out than suck."
User avatar
canman1971
Senior Mod - Celtics
Senior Mod - Celtics
Posts: 14,949
And1: 8,991
Joined: May 13, 2003
Location: 18 Championship BLVD
       

Re: Welcome back Starbury? 

Post#29 » by canman1971 » Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:44 am

Gonna lock this unless that page gets "unsuspended"

Return to Boston Celtics