GuyClinch wrote:Marbury's evil was greatly exaggerated because NY turned on him. A cancer from a small town like Indiana (and yes I been there) is something to really be scared of, IMHO.
I live in NYC and let me tell you I saw Marbury play a bunch of times. For a cancer he hustled and played well on a lot of bad teams. The major evil of Marbury was that he was a good player on alot of bad teams. Tinsley OTOH has a bad attitude; doesn't always hustle; doesn't keep himself in shape and has alot of suspect injuries. Not to mention he is a can't shoot guy something we don't need.
Pete
I completely agree with this post. What were Marbury's off-court issues that everyone keeps talking about? That he didn't get along with one of the worst GMs in history and then got forced out by the new coach with a bunch of BS manufactured drama?
Before he came to the Celtics, he hadn't played in a year and was coming off ankle surgery. Give him another year with the team and to get his legs underneath him and he'll come around. He's a better player than Tinsley, proved willing and showed what he could provide in a backup role here, and is much less of a cancer, seeing as he actually had a good relationship with some of our players, whereas Tinsley's punched Paul.