No we don't want Jason Williams
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
No we don't want Jason Williams
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
No we don't want Jason Williams
I just wanted to say this before someone makes another thread about a lousy player. I don't like him as a player or as a person. Wait I just made the post about him Dohhhh.

Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
- celticfan42487
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,526
- And1: 15,365
- Joined: Jul 22, 2005
- Location: Billerica, MA
-
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
You're the last one that should make preemptive threads about adding bad players.
Trade Rondo to sign Allen Iverson!!!
COME ON!!!!!!!!!

Trade Rondo to sign Allen Iverson!!!
COME ON!!!!!!!!!











Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
celticfan42487 wrote:You're the last one that should make preemptive threads about adding bad players.
Trade Rondo to sign Allen Iverson!!!
COME ON!!!!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
haha, good one. You forgot the Evans and Thompson part though.
Back to the topic. Jason Williams is probably a worst defender then House and Rondo. If we are going to bring in a veteran backup it should someone with a brain as well.

Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
- theman
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,541
- And1: 1,432
- Joined: May 23, 2001
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
What about Jay Williams, Jamaal Tinsley, Dajuan Wagner and all the other point guards that haven't played in over a year?
'At the beginning of a dynasty, taxation yields large revenues from small assessments. At the end of a dynasty, taxation yields small revenues from large assessments'. - Ibn Khaldun
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 142
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 22, 2002
- Contact:
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
cfan79 wrote:celticfan42487 wrote:You're the last one that should make preemptive threads about adding bad players.
Trade Rondo to sign Allen Iverson!!!
COME ON!!!!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
haha, good one. You forgot the Evans and Thompson part though.
Back to the topic. Jason Williams is probably a worst defender then House and Rondo. If we are going to bring in a veteran backup it should someone with a brain as well.
Proof read for spelling and logic. If Rondo is only "probably" better at D than Jwill and House, then Vince Carter is "probably" a better dunker than John Stockton. I know im going out on a limb there.
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,027
- And1: 27,903
- Joined: Oct 25, 2006
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
JWill is also probably a poorer rebounder than either Rondo or KG.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
sweatdog wrote:Proof read for spelling and logic. If Rondo is only "probably" better at D than Jwill and House, then Vince Carter is "probably" a better dunker than John Stockton. I know im going out on a limb there.
You're "probably" one of those fans that only watches a few games a year. So you look at Rondo's steal totals and think he's a better defender then he actually is. The guy cannot defend anyone, the only reason he's slightly better at defense then J-Will is because of his steals.

Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
- MVP16
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,342
- And1: 3
- Joined: Mar 05, 2006
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
cfan79 wrote:sweatdog wrote:Proof read for spelling and logic. If Rondo is only "probably" better at D than Jwill and House, then Vince Carter is "probably" a better dunker than John Stockton. I know im going out on a limb there.
You're "probably" one of those fans that only watches a few games a year. So you look at Rondo's steal totals and think he's a better defender then he actually is. The guy cannot defend anyone, the only reason he's slightly better at defense then J-Will is because of his steals.

Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 142
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 22, 2002
- Contact:
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
In addition, White Chocolate is "possibly" a better outside shooter than Rondo, "likely" older than Rondo, and "may be" fairer skinned than Rondo. But its all debatable.
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,725
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
cfan79 wrote:I just wanted to say this before someone makes another thread about a lousy player.
Aren't you the one who makes a thread about every lousy player?
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
I'm not the one who brought up
Roberson, Nachbar, Cartier Martin, Fesenko, R.Swift, J.Reed
Roberson, Nachbar, Cartier Martin, Fesenko, R.Swift, J.Reed

Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 238
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 16, 2009
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
too late i already made a post about him: see backup point guard???
fyi, id rather have williams than cartier martin, justin reed, or anthony roberson
and trading rondo for evans and thompson and putting iverson on this team is the worst idea ever
fyi, id rather have williams than cartier martin, justin reed, or anthony roberson
and trading rondo for evans and thompson and putting iverson on this team is the worst idea ever
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
- Bad-Thoma
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,184
- And1: 10,037
- Joined: Feb 22, 2006
- Location: Still riding proud on the C's bandwagon
Re: No we don't want Jason Williams
Irony-
1: a pretense of ignorance and of willingness to learn from another assumed in order to make the other's false conceptions conspicuous by adroit questioning —called also Socratic irony
2 a: the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning b: a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by irony c: an ironic expression or utterance
3 a (1): incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result (2): an event or result marked by such incongruity b: incongruity between a situation developed in a drama and the accompanying words or actions that is understood by the audience but not by the characters in the play —called also dramatic irony tragic irony
I think this post falls under the term "tragic irony"
1: a pretense of ignorance and of willingness to learn from another assumed in order to make the other's false conceptions conspicuous by adroit questioning —called also Socratic irony
2 a: the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning b: a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by irony c: an ironic expression or utterance
3 a (1): incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result (2): an event or result marked by such incongruity b: incongruity between a situation developed in a drama and the accompanying words or actions that is understood by the audience but not by the characters in the play —called also dramatic irony tragic irony
I think this post falls under the term "tragic irony"