ImageImageImage

Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
cfan79
RealGM
Posts: 15,784
And1: 74
Joined: Sep 27, 2003
Location: Haverhill, MA

Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#1 » by cfan79 » Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:39 pm

Baby, Tony, House, Scala

for

Blake and Przybilla


New Roster

Perkins/Przybilla/Free Agent
KG/R.Wallace
Pierce/B.Walker
R.Allen/M.Daniels/Giddens
Rondo/Blake/Hudson

Image
Image
User avatar
cfan79
RealGM
Posts: 15,784
And1: 74
Joined: Sep 27, 2003
Location: Haverhill, MA

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#2 » by cfan79 » Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:55 pm

I figured we'd get our back up point guard and inside big. Daniels can play both small forward and shooting guard if Willy Walker wets his pants. If I've forgotten anyone on the new roster lineup its probably because they stink.
Image
cloverleaf
RealGM
Posts: 10,254
And1: 7,557
Joined: Feb 10, 2007

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#3 » by cloverleaf » Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:58 pm

Ya sure this isn't "One of Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas threads"? :lol:
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,422
And1: 23,552
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#4 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:57 pm

You kno what Cfan..I respect you man..you keep making the craziest damn trade threads ever, getting torn up for it, yet you still keep coming back with more..I can respect that homie..lol

I don't want to trade Eddie house though...we would be a better team with Baby+House, than Blake and Pzryzibiilllifedwierweiriiilla..IMO.
♣ WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎♣ THANK YOU TRUTH! ♣
User avatar
cfan79
RealGM
Posts: 15,784
And1: 74
Joined: Sep 27, 2003
Location: Haverhill, MA

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#5 » by cfan79 » Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:00 pm

cloverleaf wrote:Ya sure this isn't "One of Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas threads"? :lol:


I'll try to stick to one trade idea thread at a time. This way there's not too many totally awesome trade idea threads in a row.
Image
KyleCleric
Rookie
Posts: 1,135
And1: 57
Joined: Jul 01, 2007

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#6 » by KyleCleric » Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:04 pm

deal would violate the cba
User avatar
cfan79
RealGM
Posts: 15,784
And1: 74
Joined: Sep 27, 2003
Location: Haverhill, MA

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#7 » by cfan79 » Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:13 pm

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:You kno what Cfan..I respect you man..you keep making the craziest damn trade threads ever, getting torn up for it, yet you still keep coming back with more..I can respect that homie..lol

I don't want to trade Eddie house though...we would be a better team with Baby+House, than Blake and Pzryzibiilllifedwierweiriiilla..IMO.


Yep, I'm like a very good looking terminator.

I think that Portland would want to do the trade because House is such a great shooter. I heard somewhere that Fernandez his having his time of the month and wants to leave. With House on board it wouldn't be too much of a dropoff if he did go.
Image
User avatar
cfan79
RealGM
Posts: 15,784
And1: 74
Joined: Sep 27, 2003
Location: Haverhill, MA

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#8 » by cfan79 » Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:16 pm

KyleCleric wrote:deal would violate the cba


It could be made into two separate deals if the cba is violated.
Image
KyleCleric
Rookie
Posts: 1,135
And1: 57
Joined: Jul 01, 2007

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#9 » by KyleCleric » Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:26 pm

cfan79 wrote:
KyleCleric wrote:deal would violate the cba


It could be made into two separate deals if the cba is violated.


any deal that involves Glen Davis to portland would have to involve Bayless and a min, or Batum, Fernandez, and a min to not violate the cba.
User avatar
cfan79
RealGM
Posts: 15,784
And1: 74
Joined: Sep 27, 2003
Location: Haverhill, MA

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#10 » by cfan79 » Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:34 pm

KyleCleric wrote:any deal that involves Glen Davis to portland would have to involve Bayless and a min, or Batum, Fernandez, and a min to not violate the cba.


You've explained it to me like I'm 10 yrs old now try to explain it like I am 4 yrs old. Because I don't understand why that would be the case.
Image
KyleCleric
Rookie
Posts: 1,135
And1: 57
Joined: Jul 01, 2007

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#11 » by KyleCleric » Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:27 pm

cfan79 wrote:
KyleCleric wrote:any deal that involves Glen Davis to portland would have to involve Bayless and a min, or Batum, Fernandez, and a min to not violate the cba.


You've explained it to me like I'm 10 yrs old now try to explain it like I am 4 yrs old. Because I don't understand why that would be the case.


actually. i've been explaining it to you in the more mature direction.

4 years old: You can't do it.

10 years old: You can do it only with these exact scenarios.

adult explanation: Glen Davis is a BYC player. If he is signed and traded, he could be the only Celtic in the trade. His salary counts for matching purposes half with respect to matching for the other team and full with respect to the Cs. Min players can count or not count with matching, so they can bridge the cap between say the $4.50M for Davis that the Celtics need matched and the $2.75M that the Blazers need matched. So, if Davis got the largest contract that we could offer him, the full mid-level, to trade him, he would count $2,927,000 for our team and $5,854,000. We could trade him for a player making no more than $3,758,750. In a deal with Portland, he can't be involved in a trade with Outlaw, Roy, Webster, Blake, Oden, Aldridge, Miller, or Przybilla.
User avatar
cfan79
RealGM
Posts: 15,784
And1: 74
Joined: Sep 27, 2003
Location: Haverhill, MA

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#12 » by cfan79 » Mon Jul 27, 2009 1:39 pm

I get it now, mommy wow I'm a big kid now.

I could see Portland definitely doing this deal because Brandon Roy has said publicly that his team needs a backup 4. They've got to give Benjamin Buttons (Oden) a chance eventually to be a starter for them. If he ages like in the movie he will look younger as his career goes on. Because right now he looks like he could swap stories about the old days with Bill Russell.
Image
User avatar
cfan79
RealGM
Posts: 15,784
And1: 74
Joined: Sep 27, 2003
Location: Haverhill, MA

 

Post#13 » by cfan79 » Mon Jul 27, 2009 1:48 pm

Image
Image
MoBSTa
Junior
Posts: 263
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Contact:

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#14 » by MoBSTa » Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:45 pm

Come on Cfan, I would rather get Outlaw, than Blake but Pryz would make a nice backup center.
Image
User avatar
cfan79
RealGM
Posts: 15,784
And1: 74
Joined: Sep 27, 2003
Location: Haverhill, MA

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#15 » by cfan79 » Mon Jul 27, 2009 4:00 pm

MoBSTa wrote:Come on Cfan, I would rather get Outlaw, than Blake but Pryz would make a nice backup center.


I don't think Portland would be willing to make that deal. They'd probably rather trade for David Lee then trade Outlaw for Baby. I'd probably pitch a tent if it did happen though.
Image
User avatar
cfan79
RealGM
Posts: 15,784
And1: 74
Joined: Sep 27, 2003
Location: Haverhill, MA

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#16 » by cfan79 » Mon Jul 27, 2009 4:05 pm

Trade idea Bos/Mil

T.Allen, House, Scala

for

B.Bowen, Bell, M.Allen


New Roster

Perkins/R.Wallace
KG/R.Wallace/M.Allen
Pierce/Bowen/B.Walker
R.Allen/Daniels/Giddens
Rondo/Bell/Hudson

Boston does it to get Bruce Bowen and he's more reliable offensively and defensively then Tony. Bell and House are similar so not much of a change there. M.Allen and Scala are scrappers for the end of the bench and they can give back and foot rubs.

Milwaukee does it because they get rid of some long contracts for expirings.

Image
Image
McLovin82
Ballboy
Posts: 2
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 25, 2009

Re: Cfan79's Wacky trade ideas thread 

Post#17 » by McLovin82 » Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:55 am

Anything to get rid of Tony Allen I'm down for. He's been a waste of space. At least Bruce Bowen etc might show something during the playoffs.

Return to Boston Celtics