closg00 wrote:Why all this talk about Taylor, hasn't he already signed elsewhere?
link? In resent news on Yahoo for Mike Taylor the only thing listed is tat he was invited to work out for the team.
bonsaiflipflops wrote:I would consider Tinsley over anyone of those options. Personally, I believe Hudson will eventually get signed. But I'm uncertain of just how a guard who's likely under six feet can help a team defensively.
I view Hudson as a scoring guard if anything. If that is to be his role off the bench, you already get that from House and possibly Tony. So I'm not for signing Hudson.
I don't understand the fascination with players that haven't played in over a year. Didn't Marbury show last year how much it hurt to be out of the game for so long? And Tinsley was healthy, the Pacers just didn't want him around. For that reason I say not to Tinsley, no to Dickau and no to Lue.
That leaves Hudson and Taylor. I think the C's can not sign Hudson and keep his rights. This is our one chance at Taylor.