ImageImageImage

Let's assume the worst...

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
theman
RealGM
Posts: 13,541
And1: 1,432
Joined: May 23, 2001

Re: Let's assume the worst... 

Post#21 » by theman » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:30 pm

59 wins.

Last year the Celtics were 18-7 without KG. That is a 72% winning percentage. Extrapolating that out to 82 games you get 59 wins. Granted Ray Allen and Paul Pierce are older but with the additions of Rasheed Wallace and Marquis Daniels overall this is probably a better team than last year.
'At the beginning of a dynasty, taxation yields large revenues from small assessments. At the end of a dynasty, taxation yields small revenues from large assessments'. - Ibn Khaldun
User avatar
Tricky Ricky
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: HAVERHILL MA

Re: Let's assume the worst... 

Post#22 » by Tricky Ricky » Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:17 pm

Theres no way we can beat CLe without KG, are people forgetting how good Cle is?
Quote of the year
MyInsatiableOne wrote:Did we just seriously post Danny's personal address and phone # on the board? :o
SilverQuick
Senior
Posts: 562
And1: 220
Joined: May 12, 2009
Location: Turkey
 

Re: Let's assume the worst... 

Post#23 » by SilverQuick » Thu Sep 24, 2009 6:50 pm

Tricky Ricky wrote:Theres no way we can beat CLe without KG, are people forgetting how good Cle is?

no ,but hey did you forget we are diehard fans? :D

nobody knwos what will happen until playoffs starting. maybe beating cavs is though without KG , but maybe they will be without lebron too ,who knows.
playoffs start in april, and until then water will pas under the bridge.

Return to Boston Celtics