ImageImageImage

minutes projection csnne.com

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

Gant
RealGM
Posts: 10,970
And1: 15,364
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#1 » by Gant » Fri Oct 2, 2009 6:07 pm

It's as good a guess as anybody's.

Projecting the Celtics Minutes

Rich Levine

http://csnne.com/pages/landing?Projecti ... eedID=3352
captain green
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,250
And1: 2,664
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Contact:
         

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#2 » by captain green » Fri Oct 2, 2009 6:33 pm

yep, while I hope we get more from lester, I think he's right on.
Brown's #1 fan on this forum.
User avatar
SonicYouth34
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,575
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 25, 2008
Contact:

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#3 » by SonicYouth34 » Fri Oct 2, 2009 8:16 pm

17 mins for Tony Allen?
Celtics! Horah!
Celtics! Horah!
Celtics! Horah!
1,2,3 Ubuntu.
User avatar
Spin Move
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,103
And1: 2,051
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
     

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#4 » by Spin Move » Fri Oct 2, 2009 10:08 pm

Those minutes DO NOT add up to the right amount he has may way more minutes, unless we are switching to a 74 minute game then were ok.
GoGoCeltics
Pro Prospect
Posts: 854
And1: 52
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Massachusetts

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#5 » by GoGoCeltics » Fri Oct 2, 2009 10:19 pm

Spin Move wrote:Those minutes DO NOT add up to the right amount he has may way more minutes, unless we are switching to a 74 minute game then were ok.


Not every player plays in every game.
User avatar
Spin Move
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,103
And1: 2,051
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
     

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#6 » by Spin Move » Fri Oct 2, 2009 10:26 pm

GoGoCeltics wrote:
Spin Move wrote:Those minutes DO NOT add up to the right amount he has may way more minutes, unless we are switching to a 74 minute game then were ok.


Not every player plays in every game.



Yes, but if your projecting minutes for a team the total is going to be over the course of 82 games 19680 minutes, projecting mpg without saying this player will only play 32 games is pretty meaningless, the stat stands for in an average game, about what do we expect a given player to play, so by inflating the total number of minutes you make the projection pretty worthless.
chas0x01
Sophomore
Posts: 170
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 01, 2009

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#7 » by chas0x01 » Fri Oct 2, 2009 10:55 pm

Those minutes assume that some players will be DNP status at various times throughout the season.
greenmachine_2849
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,645
And1: 133
Joined: Oct 29, 2005

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#8 » by greenmachine_2849 » Sat Oct 3, 2009 11:39 pm

These are my predictions (for games in which everyone is available):

Rondo: 37 (all at PG)
Pierce: 33 (SF)
R Allen: 32 (SG)
Perkins: 28 (C)
Garnett: 26 (PF)
Wallace: 24 (20 at C, 4 at PF)
Daniels: 23 (15 at SF, 8 at SG)
Davis: 18 (PF)
House: 11 (PG)
Giddens: 8 (SG)
Hemingway
Banned User
Posts: 3,725
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 11, 2005

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#9 » by Hemingway » Sun Oct 4, 2009 6:26 pm

Am I the only one who doesn't see the big 3 playing much less than last year. I know we will want to but we say it every year.
greenmachine_2849
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,645
And1: 133
Joined: Oct 29, 2005

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#10 » by greenmachine_2849 » Sun Oct 4, 2009 8:59 pm

Hemingway wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't see the big 3 playing much less than last year. I know we will want to but we say it every year.


This is only the third year of the big three, so we don't have much history to base that on. Having said that, we know that:

a) last year all three of them looked overworked and/or broken down by the end of the last season, particular Pierce and Garnett.
b)all of them are either already past the conventional prime age range of 27-33 or on the tail end of it.
c) Ainge has worked hard this off-season to have as many quality back-ups as possible for the big three, especially Garnett.

All of this points to at least a plan of reducing minutes for Garnett, Pierce, and Allen. Obviously, if Marquis Daniels or Rasheed Wallace gets injured during an exhibition game and has to miss the first two months of the season, the plan goes out the window. But I will say that, in a perfect world, I wouldn't mind seeing everybody except for Rondo held to 30 mpg or under. And I think, at full strength, we have the depth to do that this year.
User avatar
Spin Move
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,103
And1: 2,051
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
     

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#11 » by Spin Move » Sun Oct 4, 2009 10:41 pm

chas0x01 wrote:Those minutes assume that some players will be DNP status at various times throughout the season.



His total adds up to 271+ mpg, there are only 240, so he has got an extra 37 minutes a game, so unless your assuming that one of the big 3 misses 4/5ths of the season those numbers don't add up to anything close to meaningful, you cant have Perk and KG averaging 28 and 27 and sheed and baby averaging 30 and 24.8 respectively there's just not that many minutes, if KG and Perk play 28 and 27 minutes that leaves 41 minutes for the rest of the team in the front court, Without any minutes for Veal or Sheldon Williams that leaves his current projections 13 minutes over (much more if you take into account other players). If your going to use MPG you need to either say x will play 55 games, for people like JR giddons who wont play every game its ok to be off a little, but on an average night how much is paul pierce going to play? here are my projections for minutes

PG:Rondo 34 Daniels 8 House 6
SG: Ray 28, Daniels 10, House 10
SF: Pierce 30, Daniels 10, TA 4 Baby 4
PF KG 28. Baby 12, Sheed 8
C: Perk 28 Sheed 20

Player Total
Rondo 34
Pierce 30
Ray 28
Perk 28
KG 28
Daniels 28
Sheed 28
Baby 16
TA 4


Deep Bench
Veal, Walker or Giddons

Mostly inactive
Williams, Hudson Walker or Giddons

D- League
Lester Hudson
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#12 » by sully00 » Mon Oct 5, 2009 1:59 am

There is more than 240 mpg but the slack is not near what this guy is talking about it is about 1.7 mins a game. If KG misses a dozen games that is another 4 mpg.

I think that the easiest way to look at this is your starters are going to go roughly 30 and your back ups will go 20. I understand that people want to think that Wallace and Daniels are going to play more but just from game rotations it is difficult for a player who doesn't play the first 8 or the last 8 to play much more than 20 mpg. While you can build your rotation around maximizing bench players mins, that isn't what Boston is going to do, quite the opposite, it is about how they handle Pierce and Allen. They are the two guys who will play more than 30 and how much more will be based on how necessary they are to anchor that second unit. If it gets Daniels 28 mpg great but if it means he is closer to 20 and more mins to someone else so be it.

So figure Daniels will play more than 20 but probably less than 24 and Wallace will clock in a solid 24 because Perk isn't going to play the last 8 and loses mins to fouls. Davis is going to get 16-20 depending what load KG carries.

Rondo played 33 mpg last season, if needed he can play more but the more mins he plays he is actually less effective on the defensive end. While I don't want House on the ball I would expect him to get the mins that Rondo doesn't play. Eddie House has tendency to force coaches to play him because of his shooting ability. I don't know that Eddie is going to play 20 mpg every game but he will probably get pretty close to that because of the nights he just forces Doc to keep him on the floor.

I think Boston will primarily have a 9 man rotation with TA, Scal, and Hudson on the outside looking for mins. I thought Walker would be able to carve out a role in the first half to limit Pierce's mins but the injury is certainly a blow. TA has a much better command of the defense than Daniels so early he will get a shot to keep his role and make it 10 man rotation but I can't say I can expect his body and play to maintain it. Scal will get mins here and there as he always does. Hudson is a wild card, mostly because of Pruitt's departure there is certainly a role for a guy who can defend the point and make a jumper on this team.
SLCceltic
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 1,864
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
Location: Cabo San Lucas, México
 

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#13 » by SLCceltic » Tue Oct 6, 2009 5:29 am

Rondo-37
Pierce-36
Ray-34-37
KG-35-36
Sheed-30-32
Perk-18-20.................................Sheed/Perk/Baby is all about matching up and energy minutes
Baby-10-15

Daniels-20
Eddie-18-20

TA/Hudson-5-10
ROYALGREEN
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: minutes projection csnne.com 

Post#14 » by MyInsatiableOne » Tue Oct 6, 2009 1:34 pm

There's a post on Red's Army with a quote from Doc saying he's not going to limit minutes for the starters...

http://www.redsarmy.com/home/2009/10/doc-wont-limit-starters-minutes.html

I think Doc's great, but this is not good news...
It's still 17 to 11!!!!

Return to Boston Celtics