ImageImageImage

Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand?

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#1 » by ddb » Tue Feb 9, 2010 3:41 pm

Straight up Ray Allen and Rasheed to Philly for Iggy and Brand. The deal works in trade tracker and makes alot of sense for both teams.

Why Celtics do it: Rasheed isn't working out. Send him home to Philly to wrap up his career. The fans will love him. Sure his contract is ideal but it's for a lot less money then what's remaining on Brands contract. Brand gives the C's insurance in case Garnett goes down. He also gives us a post-player which is what we were hoping for with Wallace.
Ray Allen is getting old and we need to take advantage of his expiring deal to bring back a younger player who will help us compete this year and beyond. That player is Iggy.

Why Philly does it: Bottom line is they get rid of the Brand deal. Not only do they get a quality pro in Ray Allen, but they bring back a hometown player in Wallace who has a much smaller contract then Brand. Iverson and Wallace on the same team would be good for their gate as well.

Thoughts? Makes a lot of sense for both teams.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,302
And1: 69,910
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#2 » by Celts17Pride » Tue Feb 9, 2010 3:56 pm

That's a heck of alot better then Ray for Kevin Martin. Sign me up. Brand is a low post player so the 2nd unit wouldn't be all jump shots. I still say keep the starters and add a bench player or two but if the Celtics traded Ray Allen I could be for this trade.

Ray Allen for Kevin Martin is garbage.
User avatar
klemen4
Head Coach
Posts: 7,327
And1: 1,927
Joined: Feb 27, 2005

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#3 » by klemen4 » Tue Feb 9, 2010 3:59 pm

Elton Brand
$14,858,471
$15,959,099
$17,059,726
$18,160,354 2012/13

Andre Iguodala
$12,200,000
$12,345,250
$13,531,750
$14,718,250
$15,904,750 2013/14

:wink:

Look at those Brand number :o If his contract would be till 2012 when also KG,Wallace expire you could give idea a though, but his contract till 2013....
“The only important statistic is the final score.” — Bill Russell
darrendaye
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,033
And1: 10,040
Joined: May 06, 2001
Location: Pollard Powered, in Yonkers, NY
     

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#4 » by darrendaye » Tue Feb 9, 2010 4:10 pm

Exactly, Klemen. While we debate possible trades, it's important to remember what was said to be Ainge's goal, a younger SG and a large expiring contract. They are not very likely to add $20mm to next season's payroll, much less the numbers that extend beyond. The Celts have 7 players under contract for $63mm in 2010/11. This year's number was around $85mm and more likely to be reduced than to remain constant.
Baylor is Brat.
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#5 » by ddb » Tue Feb 9, 2010 4:13 pm

good point on the contracts fellas.

Although, a good deal for this year and next year, it would probably kill us in 12 and 13'
wbc17
Sophomore
Posts: 176
And1: 16
Joined: Apr 16, 2007
   

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#6 » by wbc17 » Tue Feb 9, 2010 4:22 pm

Thought about this deal. Though I wish Brand is capable to play like the way he did in Clippers pre-injury. Maybe he'll play with heart again alongside KG.

If we do the deal, anyone know how much money we have left to sign free agents this offseason?
vct33
Veteran
Posts: 2,533
And1: 850
Joined: Feb 17, 2008
       

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#7 » by vct33 » Tue Feb 9, 2010 5:03 pm

wbc17 wrote:If we do the deal, anyone know how much money we have left to sign free agents this offseason?


No matter what we do, all we can do is sign an MLE player in the offseason.
I brings the ruckus to the ladies!
Bluewhale
General Manager
Posts: 7,888
And1: 283
Joined: Dec 03, 2003

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#8 » by Bluewhale » Tue Feb 9, 2010 5:06 pm

At this stage of career, it's hard to argue Brand > Delmbert.
User avatar
Tricky Ricky
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: HAVERHILL MA

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#9 » by Tricky Ricky » Tue Feb 9, 2010 5:25 pm

Brand or Perk
KG
Iggy
PP
Rondo

would be interesting but would it really improve us? It would kill us cap wise for when PP/KG/Sheed are off the books
Quote of the year
MyInsatiableOne wrote:Did we just seriously post Danny's personal address and phone # on the board? :o
Kefa461
RealGM
Posts: 12,530
And1: 430
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Location: Member of Celtic Nation since '64
       

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#10 » by Kefa461 » Tue Feb 9, 2010 5:49 pm

ddb wrote:Straight up Ray Allen and Rasheed to Philly for Iggy and Brand. The deal works in trade tracker and makes alot of sense for both teams.

Why Celtics do it: Rasheed isn't working out. Send him home to Philly to wrap up his career. The fans will love him. Sure his contract is ideal but it's for a lot less money then what's remaining on Brands contract. Brand gives the C's insurance in case Garnett goes down. He also gives us a post-player which is what we were hoping for with Wallace.
Ray Allen is getting old and we need to take advantage of his expiring deal to bring back a younger player who will help us compete this year and beyond. That player is Iggy.

Why Philly does it: Bottom line is they get rid of the Brand deal. Not only do they get a quality pro in Ray Allen, but they bring back a hometown player in Wallace who has a much smaller contract then Brand. Iverson and Wallace on the same team would be good for their gate as well.

Thoughts? Makes a lot of sense for both teams.


My thoughts........they are I always listen to your trade ideas........ :wink:





8-)
WE ARE CELTIC NATION
17 TITLES, ON TO #18.
meatball sub
RealGM
Posts: 29,749
And1: 11,234
Joined: May 28, 2004
Location: in your mouth

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#11 » by meatball sub » Tue Feb 9, 2010 6:09 pm

LOL @ trading for Brand only to have him come off the bench while paying him the third most money on the team.
Celtics_85
Starter
Posts: 2,005
And1: 59
Joined: May 14, 2004

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#12 » by Celtics_85 » Tue Feb 9, 2010 6:14 pm

As Darrendaye said earlier in this post of what Ainge was looking for in a trade of Allen I came up with a deal that puts rumors into account for my idea.

Boston gets Iggy, Thomas expiring deal, Armstrong, and Sacto 1st- giving up Ray and Davis

Philly gets Ray and Davis- giving up Iggy and Dalembert

Sacto gets Dalembert- giving up Kenny Thomas expiring, Armstrong, and a 1st

I know Sacto had some interest in Dalembert and were looking to get rid of Thomas's deal to do it so this may make sense for them.
Philly is getting rid of Dalembert and Iggy who they have been shopping and get Ray and his 20 million off the books and a servicable Davis in return. If they would take Williams instead of Davis I would send them the first rounder and replace him with Armstrong for the rest of the year.

We get what Ainge is looking for in a trade for Ray with Iggy being the player and Thomas and Armstrong comming off the books.
Banks2Pierce
RealGM
Posts: 15,783
And1: 5,324
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
   

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#13 » by Banks2Pierce » Tue Feb 9, 2010 7:00 pm

Brand is the second worst contract in the NBA and will turn into the worst if Arenas is cleared off the books of Washington.
User avatar
GreenDreamer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,871
And1: 7
Joined: Dec 10, 2008

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#14 » by GreenDreamer » Tue Feb 9, 2010 7:19 pm

Brand is not a good fit here and has a terrible contract. Simply awful.
User avatar
Perk Is Beast
Ballboy
Posts: 26
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 09, 2010

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#15 » by Perk Is Beast » Tue Feb 9, 2010 11:57 pm

omfg i would do this in a second
Ray Allen and Sheed are hurting our team. I would much rather start TA than Ray. we lost against LA because Doc put Ray back in in the 2nd half.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#16 » by Slartibartfast » Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 am

GreenDreamer wrote:Brand is not a good fit here and has a terrible contract. Simply awful.


Amen. We'd have 50% of the salary cap tied up in two past their prime PFs with lingering injury concerns.

I love Iggy, but not that much.

Brand is what Kenyon Martin has been for the past several years: untradable.
User avatar
irie
RealGM
Posts: 11,353
And1: 4,502
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#17 » by irie » Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:58 am

This would make us a perennial first round exits starting in 2012 until Brand's contract is up.
|
User avatar
theman
RealGM
Posts: 13,541
And1: 1,432
Joined: May 23, 2001

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#18 » by theman » Wed Feb 10, 2010 6:27 pm

Celtics_85 wrote:As Darrendaye said earlier in this post of what Ainge was looking for in a trade of Allen I came up with a deal that puts rumors into account for my idea.

Boston gets Iggy, Thomas expiring deal, Armstrong, and Sacto 1st- giving up Ray and Davis

Philly gets Ray and Davis- giving up Iggy and Dalembert

Sacto gets Dalembert- giving up Kenny Thomas expiring, Armstrong, and a 1st

I know Sacto had some interest in Dalembert and were looking to get rid of Thomas's deal to do it so this may make sense for them.
Philly is getting rid of Dalembert and Iggy who they have been shopping and get Ray and his 20 million off the books and a servicable Davis in return. If they would take Williams instead of Davis I would send them the first rounder and replace him with Armstrong for the rest of the year.

We get what Ainge is looking for in a trade for Ray with Iggy being the player and Thomas and Armstrong comming off the books.


I like that a lot but I can't see Sacramento giving up a first to get a Delembert especially when they have Hawes. Take out the pick the Sac. might do it.

Keep in mind half of the Phili fans wouldn't trade Jason Kapono to Boston for Rajon Rondo. That doesn't mean the GMs wouldn't deal with each other.

Maybe this could happen if Boston sent a first to Phili.
'At the beginning of a dynasty, taxation yields large revenues from small assessments. At the end of a dynasty, taxation yields small revenues from large assessments'. - Ibn Khaldun
avi623
Senior
Posts: 709
And1: 43
Joined: Aug 19, 2004

Re: Why not R. Allen + Wallace for Iggy and Brand? 

Post#19 » by avi623 » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:49 pm

Has Philly indicated that they are willing to give up their best player to a team in their own division? Look, I am well aware the 76ers want to save money, but look at the rumored Iggy deals. I don't hear him being rumored to New York, NJ, or Toronto. There is a reason: teams usually do not trade their best player to a team in their own division, let alone the division leader.

This is before we get to the problem of where Iggy fits on this team. Yeah he is a great defender and a do it all player. But his shooting, alongside Rondo's awful shooting, would be toxic.

Return to Boston Celtics