ImageImageImage

2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!)

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,343
And1: 15,888
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1101 » by Fierce1 » Mon Jun 23, 2025 12:29 pm

Celticlifer wrote:Lacking in IQ, come on. They're record as a twosome is incredible. Lots of knee jerk going on here.

JT's shooting % is way down the last 2 seasons because he keeps jacking up 3s even if there's a defender contesting the shot.

JB is in his 9th season in the NBA and he still dribbles the ball even when there are multiple defenders around him.

Those are things the Pacers and OKC don't do.

It's basketball 101.

Why force a shot when you can pass the ball or drive to the basket instead.

And players in high school are taught to not dribble the ball when there are multiple defenders around you.
User avatar
SuperDeluxe
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 23,894
And1: 23,455
Joined: Feb 23, 2003
Location: Celtic Nation
   

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1102 » by SuperDeluxe » Mon Jun 23, 2025 12:32 pm

Fierce1 wrote:And players in high school are taught to not dribble the ball when there are multiple defenders around you.

It's also common sense.
fallguy wrote:Win by 30 or it's a loss.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,343
And1: 15,888
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1103 » by Fierce1 » Mon Jun 23, 2025 12:35 pm

SuperDeluxe wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:And players in high school are taught to not dribble the ball when there are multiple defenders around you.

It's also common sense.

True.

We've seen it many times over the years.

It's a turnover waiting to happen when JB takes more than 3 dribbles and he tries to dribble through 2 defenders.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,343
And1: 15,888
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1104 » by Fierce1 » Mon Jun 23, 2025 12:40 pm

JT was forgiven in 2024 because the Cs won a chip and maybe it was just a down year for JT.

But this season, it's like JT doubled down and jacked up 3s like crazy.

I thought JT would get serious and lessen the 3s when the playoffs arrived.

But the Game 1 loss to NY was 100% on JT.

That was really disappointing from JT.
Smart2Nesmith43
Starter
Posts: 2,235
And1: 6,232
Joined: Nov 06, 2021
 

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1105 » by Smart2Nesmith43 » Mon Jun 23, 2025 12:45 pm

Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:
redslastlaugh wrote:Indiana trades #23 to New Orleans for their own (Indy's) 2026 first back, the pick that went to Toronto for Siakam then to New Orleans for BI.
This makes sense because Indiana young guys they already have: Walker, Mathurin, Sheppard and Furphy probably need more minutes

Read on Twitter

And that right there is why one franchise is in the Finals and the other is always irrelevant. Pacers already have more guys than they can play and would much rather have the flexibility of an additional first round pick this summer/next trade deadline to improve their roster than a late first rounder riding the bench. They also get all the upside (in case their next season goes sideways and they stumble into a high pick) and virtually no downside (worst case scenario they trade down from #23 this year to #30 next year which really isn't a big deal). The Pelicans get a shiny new toy right now at the expense of better long term management of their assets.

I hate being right sometimes :(
GrandTheftRondo
RealGM
Posts: 10,224
And1: 10,754
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1106 » by GrandTheftRondo » Mon Jun 23, 2025 12:48 pm

Man still hurts to think that we traded for **** Kyrie in 2018 the pick that could have been used on SGA.

Imagine that for a big 3!
Celticlifer
Ballboy
Posts: 44
And1: 53
Joined: Jun 10, 2017

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1107 » by Celticlifer » Mon Jun 23, 2025 1:06 pm

Basketball 101. Right, they had a couple of bad games after an incredibly long season with Olympics, etc. and all of a sudden we're a stupid team. got Our number 2 and 5 players are injured/sick. remember what Parcells said, you are what your record says you are. Our record speaks for itself and it doesn't say low BBIQ. It says highly intelligent, focused team that plays together with low egos from its superstars.
Of course, we could blow it up to see what binkie might be better. a real high IQ move.
cl2117
General Manager
Posts: 8,924
And1: 7,541
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
 

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1108 » by cl2117 » Mon Jun 23, 2025 1:11 pm

Apparently Miami now looking at Derozan and Sacramento previously was interested in Jrue, I think there could be something there with that trio. Ignoring the value that has to be swung around, something like this:

SAC: Jrue, Tillman

MIA: Derozan, Terrance Davis

BKN: Duncan Robinson (waived for only $9.8m cap hit), asset value from Miami

BOS: nothing

Kings get a great fit next to Lavine, hopefully a guy who helps connect all their other pieces in a way that the sum is greater than its parts.

I don't know why Miami would want Derozan honestly, it feels like the most treadmill of treadmill options, but if they are interested and willing to pay some value for it more power to them.

Part of the value paid by Miami for Derozan (absent from above because I don't know what that looks like) goes to BKN to eat Duncan Robinson in space. Miami gets a $20m TPE, BKN get's to sell $10m in cap space twice, and we don't have to take any money back creating our own $32m TPE.

C's create a massive TPE and end up only $5m shy of ducking the tax. Tack on a KP trade where we take a little less back or Hauser trade for nothing (I'd prefer the former over the latter) and we've reset the cap and possibly snagged a few assets in the process.

What realistically would Miami give up for Derozan and could we realistically insert Jrue in for SAC's return and take that for ourselves?
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
bigfoot_cryptozoology
Head Coach
Posts: 6,022
And1: 5,362
Joined: Jun 21, 2002

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1109 » by bigfoot_cryptozoology » Mon Jun 23, 2025 1:35 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,343
And1: 15,888
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1110 » by Fierce1 » Mon Jun 23, 2025 1:36 pm

Celticlifer wrote:Basketball 101. Right, they had a couple of bad games after an incredibly long season with Olympics, etc. and all of a sudden we're a stupid team. got Our number 2 and 5 players are injured/sick. remember what Parcells said, you are what your record says you are. Our record speaks for itself and it doesn't say low BBIQ. It says highly intelligent, focused team that plays together with low egos from its superstars.
Of course, we could blow it up to see what binkie might be better. a real high IQ move.

The Celtic record is because the Jays are ultra talented.

Nobody's questioning their talent.

It's the bad decisions.

The Celtics' talent got them a championship.

But relying solely on talent will not work anymore.

Why would you keep jacking up 3s when it's not falling?

And why dribble when 2 defenders are around you?

Like another poster said, it's common sense.
bfchs123
Pro Prospect
Posts: 870
And1: 1,935
Joined: May 15, 2019
     

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1111 » by bfchs123 » Mon Jun 23, 2025 1:39 pm

Fierce1 wrote:
chrisab123 wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:Not saying you're wrong, but OKC is a bad matchup for the Cs.

When the Cs lost to OKC at home, in the regular, JT had one of his best games this season.

It wasn't enough as OKC really capitalized on every bad shot the Cs took and made the Cs pay for every mistake they made.

The Cs are just not efficient enough and smart enough to beat OKC.

Right now the standard is OKC.

So if the Cs are not on the same level as OKC, might as well try something else.


Retooling is fine. Adding another dimension is fine. But trading Brown for the sake of getting the contract out of here and trying something new is knee jerk. You try something new by trading KP or Jrue to extend your window which is still wide open as long as you have JT White and Brown. If you trade Brown you’re going to be in a slightly better situation than Milwaukee in 2 years only because you have younger talent and all your picks except the one owed to SAS.

I can’t see Boston blowing it up around Tatum and Tatum playing good soldier for more than a year. He’s under contract so they can deal with him or whatever but when a player asks out they usually get what they want.

I agree that trading JB just for the sake of getting out of the contract is wrong.

We're on the same page on that.

I would only move JB for Giannis or the #2 pick and great offer from the Spurs.

Keeping JB is the safe move, but I don't believe the Cs will be getting Banner 19 in the near future with the Jays leading the way.

As one of JT's biggest fan, I have to admit that JT and JB are lacking in the bball IQ department.


If trading Brown it has to be one of those "WTF was the other team thinking" type deals otherwise doesn't make any sense. We'll make our own run next year in the wide open east
WeLikeOurGuys
General Manager
Posts: 9,777
And1: 7,904
Joined: May 18, 2010
       

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1112 » by WeLikeOurGuys » Mon Jun 23, 2025 1:44 pm

Fierce1 wrote:
Celticlifer wrote:Basketball 101. Right, they had a couple of bad games after an incredibly long season with Olympics, etc. and all of a sudden we're a stupid team. got Our number 2 and 5 players are injured/sick. remember what Parcells said, you are what your record says you are. Our record speaks for itself and it doesn't say low BBIQ. It says highly intelligent, focused team that plays together with low egos from its superstars.
Of course, we could blow it up to see what binkie might be better. a real high IQ move.

The Celtic record is because the Jays are ultra talented.

Nobody's questioning their talent.

It's the bad decisions.

The Celtics' talent got them a championship.

But relying solely on talent will not work anymore.

Why would you keep jacking up 3s when it's not falling?

And why dribble when 2 defenders are around you?

Like another poster said, it's common sense.


I think the real issue is coaching. Even though the Celtics won a championship with Joe Mazzulla, I still think his system kind of sucks. He doubled down on the team taking a ton of threes, and I think that’s a big reason why Tatum has started settling for so many jumpers. On top of that, for some reason they tried using Jaylen Brown more as a point forward this season—even though that’s clearly not his game.

At the start of last year, they were focused on developing Tatum’s post game, but they completely abandoned it to fit into Joe’s three-point-heavy strategy. That’s the biggest issue to me—it starts with Mazzulla.

I’m not saying Joe is the worst coach out there, but for a veteran group like this, I honestly think he’s a bad fit. And what’s really telling is that there’s been zero information about his contract situation. Why would they let him enter next season with only one year left? And if they’re truly sold on him, why didn’t they extend him after winning the title?

Something doesn’t add up.
celtxman
Analyst
Posts: 3,745
And1: 1,893
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
   

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1113 » by celtxman » Mon Jun 23, 2025 1:45 pm

GrandTheftRondo wrote:Man still hurts to think that we traded for **** Kyrie in 2018 the pick that could have been used on SGA.

Imagine that for a big 3!

What makes it more painful is Ainge doubled down. He had a chance at redemption and blew it. The Clippers called the Celtics wanting Irving. The Clippers proved later they didn't think much of Shai as they traded him to OKC. When Irving said "I don't owe anyone sh#* about staying with Boston ,10 days before the trade deadline, Ainge should have picked up the phone and called LA back. But he stubbornly held onto his Irving/AD dream.
Brad Stevens on fans who want the Celtics to tank: "I don’t think they’ll like me all that much then."
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,343
And1: 15,888
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1114 » by Fierce1 » Mon Jun 23, 2025 1:50 pm

bfchs123 wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:
chrisab123 wrote:
Retooling is fine. Adding another dimension is fine. But trading Brown for the sake of getting the contract out of here and trying something new is knee jerk. You try something new by trading KP or Jrue to extend your window which is still wide open as long as you have JT White and Brown. If you trade Brown you’re going to be in a slightly better situation than Milwaukee in 2 years only because you have younger talent and all your picks except the one owed to SAS.

I can’t see Boston blowing it up around Tatum and Tatum playing good soldier for more than a year. He’s under contract so they can deal with him or whatever but when a player asks out they usually get what they want.

I agree that trading JB just for the sake of getting out of the contract is wrong.

We're on the same page on that.

I would only move JB for Giannis or the #2 pick and great offer from the Spurs.

Keeping JB is the safe move, but I don't believe the Cs will be getting Banner 19 in the near future with the Jays leading the way.

As one of JT's biggest fan, I have to admit that JT and JB are lacking in the bball IQ department.


If trading Brown it has to be one of those "WTF was the other team thinking" type deals otherwise doesn't make any sense. We'll make our own run next year in the wide open east

Agree!

It's not like I'm proposing trading JB for DeRozan.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,343
And1: 15,888
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1115 » by Fierce1 » Mon Jun 23, 2025 1:54 pm

WeLikeOurGuys wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:
Celticlifer wrote:Basketball 101. Right, they had a couple of bad games after an incredibly long season with Olympics, etc. and all of a sudden we're a stupid team. got Our number 2 and 5 players are injured/sick. remember what Parcells said, you are what your record says you are. Our record speaks for itself and it doesn't say low BBIQ. It says highly intelligent, focused team that plays together with low egos from its superstars.
Of course, we could blow it up to see what binkie might be better. a real high IQ move.

The Celtic record is because the Jays are ultra talented.

Nobody's questioning their talent.

It's the bad decisions.

The Celtics' talent got them a championship.

But relying solely on talent will not work anymore.

Why would you keep jacking up 3s when it's not falling?

And why dribble when 2 defenders are around you?

Like another poster said, it's common sense.


I think the real issue is coaching. Even though the Celtics won a championship with Joe Mazzulla, I still think his system kind of sucks. He doubled down on the team taking a ton of threes, and I think that’s a big reason why Tatum has started settling for so many jumpers. On top of that, for some reason they tried using Jaylen Brown more as a point forward this season—even though that’s clearly not his game.

At the start of last year, they were focused on developing Tatum’s post game, but they completely abandoned it to fit into Joe’s three-point-heavy strategy. That’s the biggest issue to me—it starts with Mazzulla.

I’m not saying Joe is the worst coach out there, but for a veteran group like this, I honestly think he’s a bad fit. And what’s really telling is that there’s been zero information about his contract situation. Why would they let him enter next season with only one year left? And if they’re truly sold on him, why didn’t they extend him after winning the title?

Something doesn’t add up.

Also true.

Joe should tweak his system starting this coming season.

Like I said, the league has caught up with Mazzulla-Ball.
bigfoot_cryptozoology
Head Coach
Posts: 6,022
And1: 5,362
Joined: Jun 21, 2002

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1116 » by bigfoot_cryptozoology » Mon Jun 23, 2025 1:55 pm

Read on Twitter
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 41,274
And1: 24,803
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1117 » by Curmudgeon » Mon Jun 23, 2025 2:01 pm

I'm not convinced that Giannis is staying in Milwaukee. Except for him, most of the potential "big dominoes" are Celtics.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,343
And1: 15,888
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1118 » by Fierce1 » Mon Jun 23, 2025 2:05 pm

Giannis to Boston

JB to Spurs

#2 pick and other assets to Milwaukee
hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,539
And1: 8,836
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1119 » by hugepatsfan » Mon Jun 23, 2025 2:10 pm

WeLikeOurGuys wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:
Celticlifer wrote:Basketball 101. Right, they had a couple of bad games after an incredibly long season with Olympics, etc. and all of a sudden we're a stupid team. got Our number 2 and 5 players are injured/sick. remember what Parcells said, you are what your record says you are. Our record speaks for itself and it doesn't say low BBIQ. It says highly intelligent, focused team that plays together with low egos from its superstars.
Of course, we could blow it up to see what binkie might be better. a real high IQ move.

The Celtic record is because the Jays are ultra talented.

Nobody's questioning their talent.

It's the bad decisions.

The Celtics' talent got them a championship.

But relying solely on talent will not work anymore.

Why would you keep jacking up 3s when it's not falling?

And why dribble when 2 defenders are around you?

Like another poster said, it's common sense.


I think the real issue is coaching. Even though the Celtics won a championship with Joe Mazzulla, I still think his system kind of sucks. He doubled down on the team taking a ton of threes, and I think that’s a big reason why Tatum has started settling for so many jumpers. On top of that, for some reason they tried using Jaylen Brown more as a point forward this season—even though that’s clearly not his game.

At the start of last year, they were focused on developing Tatum’s post game, but they completely abandoned it to fit into Joe’s three-point-heavy strategy. That’s the biggest issue to me—it starts with Mazzulla.

I’m not saying Joe is the worst coach out there, but for a veteran group like this, I honestly think he’s a bad fit. And what’s really telling is that there’s been zero information about his contract situation. Why would they let him enter next season with only one year left? And if they’re truly sold on him, why didn’t they extend him after winning the title?

Something doesn’t add up.


I think if they want to get away from taking so many threes Brad is going to have to give the team a single player on the team who can dribble through traffic. Every player on the team sucks at it. Jrue/White are combo guards vs. true PGs because of that. Tatum/Brown are great, but compared to high usage ball handlers they're both horrendous ball handlers. Pritchard improved some but still gets cuaght like a deer in the headlights most time he handles inside the 3 point line. The only player on the team I'd say is a "plus" ball handler relative to their position are Tatum as a "PF" but really he plays PG so that's moot and then Horford as a C but that's really so meaningless because it's such low threshold/and volume of plays.

They need to play 5 out a ton and space the floor that way because it's the only way to draw the defense out and make up for their total lack of ability to handle through tighter traffic.
WeLikeOurGuys
General Manager
Posts: 9,777
And1: 7,904
Joined: May 18, 2010
       

Re: 2025 Offseason Trade and Free Agency Thread (Wow this is fun!) 

Post#1120 » by WeLikeOurGuys » Mon Jun 23, 2025 2:13 pm

I still think Brad finds a way to sneak into the lottery without trading Brown, White, or Tatum.

Return to Boston Celtics