ImageImageImage

Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

jaypete34133413
Ballboy
Posts: 15
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 24, 2013

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1121 » by jaypete34133413 » Wed Dec 25, 2013 7:46 am

You would really give up Jordan Crawford and Jeff Green for that weak trade....My line up in my previous post is way better then what you just posted... Come on man....and Bradley is actually good....there's No proven scorer or dominate player in your line up man.....that is horrible..smh.....what exactly are you looking for that team will never see the finals...smh
User avatar
Gugna
Sophomore
Posts: 128
And1: 11
Joined: Mar 04, 2012
Location: Athens, Greece
   

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1122 » by Gugna » Wed Dec 25, 2013 12:04 pm

jaypete34133413 wrote:You would really give up Jordan Crawford and Jeff Green for that weak trade....My line up in my previous post is way better then what you just posted... Come on man....and Bradley is actually good....there's No proven scorer or dominate player in your line up man.....that is horrible..smh.....what exactly are you looking for that team will never see the finals...smh


If you think Amar'e+Granger minus Rondo is what makes us better than the Heat you are hugely deluded. Granger and Green can't coexist in the same lineup no matter what. Amar'e is not even a shell of his old self and will probably amount to nothing in a 7-game series(IF we take it that far which is a bigger IF than Amar'e being healthy at all.) You need to rethink this through and come back with a better suggestion.
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1123 » by CelticFaninLBC » Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:01 pm

jaypete34133413 wrote:Tyreke Evans would be a nice fit

Granger and Hill would be Lovely

I'm a Sully fan but with back issues like his I don't know....also he's a shorty for that position

I honestly think that Amaré needs a new home and watch him pick it up

I think this line up can defeat the Heat and its possible too obtain these players

Crawford / Hill
Granger/ Bradley
Green
Stat/Sully
A.O


-1
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,390
And1: 13,248
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1124 » by brackdan70 » Wed Dec 25, 2013 5:36 pm

jaypete34133413 wrote:Tyreke Evans would be a nice fit

Granger and Hill would be Lovely

I'm a Sully fan but with back issues like his I don't know....also he's a shorty for that position

I honestly think that Amaré needs a new home and watch him pick it up

I think this line up can defeat the Heat and its possible too obtain these players

Crawford / Hill
Granger/ Bradley
Green
Stat/Sully
A.O


-2
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,390
And1: 13,248
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1125 » by brackdan70 » Wed Dec 25, 2013 5:58 pm

shawn unkempt wrote:A Larry Sanders/Sully combo would be amazing. I hope Danny has been on the phone with them trying to get something done.


I agree it is pretty intriguing, I think the possibility of getting Sanders and staying under the tax is pretty small.

From the Hoops Rumors link
"Further complicating any trade is the Poison Pill Provision, which would come in to play since Sanders signed a rookie scale extension that hasn’t kicked in yet. His $3.053MM salary for this season would count as his outgoing salary for Milwaukee, but he’d represent about $7.027MM in incoming salary for the team that acquires him. That figure is the average between Sanders’ 2013/14 salary and the average annual value of his extension. So, any trade would have to include additional salary going out on both sides, or a third team."

So if we use the TPE from Pierce Trade we could land him with a pick or two going out probably, but would definitely go into tax territory. We could stretch Wallace to save about 5 million + right...So would need another trade where we shed 2 million to get back under the tax.(Lee and pick(s) for Hayward?) possible I guess. But then we have Sanders for 4 years and 44 million. Is that a contract we want while rebuilding? I am not so sure. Would almost guarantee we go into the tax next season.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
jaypete34133413
Ballboy
Posts: 15
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 24, 2013

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1126 » by jaypete34133413 » Wed Dec 25, 2013 6:04 pm

I'm actually from NY and I watch more Knicks games then all of you and he's really still good he's just not getting play time I'm serious....and Granger and Green might have a better chance then Pierce and Johnson I bet you thought that would work it and its Joe Johnson gunning all the time preventing Paul too get into his rhythm..and you act like the Celtics will get worse with Granger ! I mean look at us now....Ive been reading this forum for years and guess what ....yall still have the same dum ideas....trying too trade establish talent for young guys who aren't gonna be that good...So I know that team would be deadly if healthy....they are all young and Watch Rondo get hurt again....ever since DWade hurt His elbow Rondo has been getting hurt....he has a attitude problem shoving refs and all like wake up
....stop it...yall trade ideas is horrible ...
User avatar
15th overall
RealGM
Posts: 11,482
And1: 5,853
Joined: Mar 02, 2005
Location: ball of confusion
 

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1127 » by 15th overall » Wed Dec 25, 2013 6:13 pm

Unless there's a time machine on hand, Amare would never start over Sully at this point. Also, Rondo's elbow has literally nothing to do with his ACL-- none, no connection whatsoever.
Image
"[Brad Stevens] was just cool. He's always, always super cool." -- Stanley Johnson
User avatar
AKFO
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,308
And1: 1,736
Joined: May 24, 2012
   

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1128 » by AKFO » Wed Dec 25, 2013 7:21 pm

jaypete34133413 wrote:I'm actually from NY and I watch more Knicks games then all of you and he's really still good he's just not getting play time I'm serious....and Granger and Green might have a better chance then Pierce and Johnson I bet you thought that would work it and its Joe Johnson gunning all the time preventing Paul too get into his rhythm..and you act like the Celtics will get worse with Granger ! I mean look at us now....Ive been reading this forum for years and guess what ....yall still have the same dum ideas....trying too trade establish talent for young guys who aren't gonna be that good...So I know that team would be deadly if healthy....they are all young and Watch Rondo get hurt again....ever since DWade hurt His elbow Rondo has been getting hurt....he has a attitude problem shoving refs and all like wake up
....stop it...yall trade ideas is horrible ...

:lol: Please post more; I haven't laughed this hard in a while :lol:
Image
User avatar
Roddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,010
And1: 10,808
Joined: Jun 19, 2010
Location: France
 

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1129 » by Roddy » Wed Dec 25, 2013 8:24 pm

Thaddeus Young / Evan Turner / Jason Richardson
for
Kris Humphries / Jeff Green / Jordan Crawford / 1st round pick.

Rondo / Pressey
Avery / Lee / Brooks / Richardson
Turner / Wallace
Young / Bass / Olynyk
Sully / Faverani
GreenFor3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 764
And1: 388
Joined: Dec 06, 2013
   

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1130 » by GreenFor3 » Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:41 pm

jaypete34133413 wrote:I'm actually from NY and I watch more Knicks games then all of you and he's really still good he's just not getting play time I'm serious....and Granger and Green might have a better chance then Pierce and Johnson I bet you thought that would work it and its Joe Johnson gunning all the time preventing Paul too get into his rhythm..and you act like the Celtics will get worse with Granger ! I mean look at us now....Ive been reading this forum for years and guess what ....yall still have the same dum ideas....trying too trade establish talent for young guys who aren't gonna be that good...So I know that team would be deadly if healthy....they are all young and Watch Rondo get hurt again....ever since DWade hurt His elbow Rondo has been getting hurt....he has a attitude problem shoving refs and all like wake up
....stop it...yall trade ideas is horrible ...

So you're a Knicks fan? On their board they say Rondo isn't even worth THJ and Sump, let alone any picks, as well as us taking back Amare. Two old injury prone guys to replace our best player won't make us better than Miami. Not sure how trading Rondo in his prime for two guys who used to be good is an example of how smart you are.

Speaking of Amare, he just got posterized by Reggie Jackson haha. The Knicks suck.
GreenFor3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 764
And1: 388
Joined: Dec 06, 2013
   

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1131 » by GreenFor3 » Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:44 pm

Roddy wrote:Thaddeus Young / Evan Turner / Jason Richardson
for
Kris Humphries / Jeff Green / Jordan Crawford / 1st round pick.

Rondo / Pressey
Avery / Lee / Brooks / Richardson
Turner / Wallace
Young / Bass / Olynyk
Sully / Faverani

We'd need to pay Turner after the year and Thad doesn't help much, I'd rather get a center so Sully can develop in his natural position. Adding a first on top of that too is just pointless. I doubt we'd want to pay Turner what he wants, or that he'd want to resign here. I think the only way that we'd do that trade was if we got rid of Wallace as well, or you could take the pick out and maybe, but it's just a lateral move.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,390
And1: 13,248
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1132 » by brackdan70 » Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:08 pm

GreenFor3 wrote:
Roddy wrote:Thaddeus Young / Evan Turner / Jason Richardson
for
Kris Humphries / Jeff Green / Jordan Crawford / 1st round pick.

Rondo / Pressey
Avery / Lee / Brooks / Richardson
Turner / Wallace
Young / Bass / Olynyk
Sully / Faverani

We'd need to pay Turner after the year and Thad doesn't help much, I'd rather get a center so Sully can develop in his natural position. Adding a first on top of that too is just pointless. I doubt we'd want to pay Turner what he wants, or that he'd want to resign here. I think the only way that we'd do that trade was if we got rid of Wallace as well, or you could take the pick out and maybe, but it's just a lateral move.


agree i don't really see the point except to help Philly
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
User avatar
shawn unkempt
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,359
And1: 4,999
Joined: Dec 09, 2012
 

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1133 » by shawn unkempt » Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:45 pm

brackdan70 wrote:
shawn unkempt wrote:A Larry Sanders/Sully combo would be amazing. I hope Danny has been on the phone with them trying to get something done.


I agree it is pretty intriguing, I think the possibility of getting Sanders and staying under the tax is pretty small.

From the Hoops Rumors link
"Further complicating any trade is the Poison Pill Provision, which would come in to play since Sanders signed a rookie scale extension that hasn’t kicked in yet. His $3.053MM salary for this season would count as his outgoing salary for Milwaukee, but he’d represent about $7.027MM in incoming salary for the team that acquires him. That figure is the average between Sanders’ 2013/14 salary and the average annual value of his extension. So, any trade would have to include additional salary going out on both sides, or a third team."

So if we use the TPE from Pierce Trade we could land him with a pick or two going out probably, but would definitely go into tax territory. We could stretch Wallace to save about 5 million + right...So would need another trade where we shed 2 million to get back under the tax.(Lee and pick(s) for Hayward?) possible I guess. But then we have Sanders for 4 years and 44 million. Is that a contract we want while rebuilding? I am not so sure. Would almost guarantee we go into the tax next season.

Hmm, I didn't realize that was the case. Wouldn't sending the salaries of Bogans and a smaller one like Brooks be enough to keep us out of the tax with that provision? I'm not sure how the Poison Pill interacts with matching salaries. Obviously the whole point of the deal would involve some pick(s) coming from us, too.

I think Sanders salary is definitely reasonable, considering his already great defense and offensive potential out of the pick and roll, he could develop into a Tyson Chandler type. Even if he doesn't reach that, his defense is enough to warrant that deal, IMO. As long as he doesn't regress, anyway (he did have a pretty bad start before he was injured).
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,390
And1: 13,248
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1134 » by brackdan70 » Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:50 pm

shawn unkempt wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:
shawn unkempt wrote:A Larry Sanders/Sully combo would be amazing. I hope Danny has been on the phone with them trying to get something done.


I agree it is pretty intriguing, I think the possibility of getting Sanders and staying under the tax is pretty small.

From the Hoops Rumors link
"Further complicating any trade is the Poison Pill Provision, which would come in to play since Sanders signed a rookie scale extension that hasn’t kicked in yet. His $3.053MM salary for this season would count as his outgoing salary for Milwaukee, but he’d represent about $7.027MM in incoming salary for the team that acquires him. That figure is the average between Sanders’ 2013/14 salary and the average annual value of his extension. So, any trade would have to include additional salary going out on both sides, or a third team."

So if we use the TPE from Pierce Trade we could land him with a pick or two going out probably, but would definitely go into tax territory. We could stretch Wallace to save about 5 million + right...So would need another trade where we shed 2 million to get back under the tax.(Lee and pick(s) for Hayward?) possible I guess. But then we have Sanders for 4 years and 44 million. Is that a contract we want while rebuilding? I am not so sure. Would almost guarantee we go into the tax next season.

Hmm, I didn't realize that was the case. Wouldn't sending the salaries of Bogans and a smaller one like Brooks be enough to keep us out of the tax with that provision? I'm not sure how the Poison Pill interacts with matching salaries. Obviously the whole point of the deal would involve some pick(s) coming from us, too.

I think Sanders salary is definitely reasonable, considering his already great defense and offensive potential out of the pick and roll, he could develop into a Tyson Chandler type. Even if he doesn't reach that, his defense is enough to warrant that deal, IMO. As long as he doesn't regress, anyway (he did have a pretty bad start before he was injured).

If I understand correctly his outgoing salary is 3 million for Milwaukee and incoming would be 7 million. this seems a little screwy so please correct me if i am off base. But if true what ever Milwaukee gets would have to work as a trade for a 3million dollar guy. So if the Cs want him we need to use the TPE or a pretty weird multi team scenario.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1135 » by KJandHondo35 » Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:08 pm

brackdan70 wrote:
shawn unkempt wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:
I agree it is pretty intriguing, I think the possibility of getting Sanders and staying under the tax is pretty small.

From the Hoops Rumors link
"Further complicating any trade is the Poison Pill Provision, which would come in to play since Sanders signed a rookie scale extension that hasn’t kicked in yet. His $3.053MM salary for this season would count as his outgoing salary for Milwaukee, but he’d represent about $7.027MM in incoming salary for the team that acquires him. That figure is the average between Sanders’ 2013/14 salary and the average annual value of his extension. So, any trade would have to include additional salary going out on both sides, or a third team."

So if we use the TPE from Pierce Trade we could land him with a pick or two going out probably, but would definitely go into tax territory. We could stretch Wallace to save about 5 million + right...So would need another trade where we shed 2 million to get back under the tax.(Lee and pick(s) for Hayward?) possible I guess. But then we have Sanders for 4 years and 44 million. Is that a contract we want while rebuilding? I am not so sure. Would almost guarantee we go into the tax next season.

Hmm, I didn't realize that was the case. Wouldn't sending the salaries of Bogans and a smaller one like Brooks be enough to keep us out of the tax with that provision? I'm not sure how the Poison Pill interacts with matching salaries. Obviously the whole point of the deal would involve some pick(s) coming from us, too.

I think Sanders salary is definitely reasonable, considering his already great defense and offensive potential out of the pick and roll, he could develop into a Tyson Chandler type. Even if he doesn't reach that, his defense is enough to warrant that deal, IMO. As long as he doesn't regress, anyway (he did have a pretty bad start before he was injured).

If I understand correctly his outgoing salary is 3 million for Milwaukee and incoming would be 7 million. this seems a little screwy so please correct me if i am off base.


That is correct, 3.5 million for Bucks and 7ish for Celtics. Money wise it shouldn't be a problem bc of the Pierce Trade Exception which is worth 10.2 million. It also would be an issue next year if the contracts we get back are expiring. For instance something like Rondo for Sanders, Knight and Caron Butler (trade Exception) would make Sanders/Knights contract equal to appx 9 mill and Rondos out going 12mill with Butlers 8 expiring.
Image
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1136 » by KJandHondo35 » Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:11 pm

KJandHondo35 wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:
shawn unkempt wrote:Hmm, I didn't realize that was the case. Wouldn't sending the salaries of Bogans and a smaller one like Brooks be enough to keep us out of the tax with that provision? I'm not sure how the Poison Pill interacts with matching salaries. Obviously the whole point of the deal would involve some pick(s) coming from us, too.

I think Sanders salary is definitely reasonable, considering his already great defense and offensive potential out of the pick and roll, he could develop into a Tyson Chandler type. Even if he doesn't reach that, his defense is enough to warrant that deal, IMO. As long as he doesn't regress, anyway (he did have a pretty bad start before he was injured).

If I understand correctly his outgoing salary is 3 million for Milwaukee and incoming would be 7 million. this seems a little screwy so please correct me if i am off base.


That is correct, 3.5 million for Bucks and 7ish for Celtics. Money wise it shouldn't be a problem bc of the Pierce Trade Exception which is worth 10.2 million. It also would be an issue next year if the contracts we get back are expiring. For instance something like Rondo for Sanders, Knight and Caron Butler (trade Exception) would make Sanders/Knights contract equal to appx 9 mill and Rondos out going 12mill with Butlers 8 expiring.



Correction: wouldn't be an issue
Image
GhostofJizzbird
Junior
Posts: 255
And1: 79
Joined: Sep 19, 2013

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1137 » by GhostofJizzbird » Thu Dec 26, 2013 12:48 am

wickerhd wrote:Didn't he get involved in a bar fight earlier this year. Anybody else remember the last Milwaukee F/C with a drinking problem we signed? Vin Baker II would scare me to death!


just so we're clear, one bar fight does not = drinking problem
gammajamma
Senior
Posts: 525
And1: 294
Joined: Feb 28, 2012

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1138 » by gammajamma » Thu Dec 26, 2013 1:38 am

GhostofJizzbird wrote:
wickerhd wrote:Didn't he get involved in a bar fight earlier this year. Anybody else remember the last Milwaukee F/C with a drinking problem we signed? Vin Baker II would scare me to death!


just so we're clear, one bar fight does not = drinking problem


for all we know some drunk idiot could be the one at fault in the situation.
User avatar
DK-All Day
General Manager
Posts: 9,746
And1: 8,458
Joined: Oct 12, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1139 » by DK-All Day » Thu Dec 26, 2013 2:15 am

Westbrook for Rondo+filler

Who says no?,assuming Rondo is back to his triple-double a night self.
Handsome.
GreenFor3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 764
And1: 388
Joined: Dec 06, 2013
   

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1140 » by GreenFor3 » Thu Dec 26, 2013 2:50 am

DK-All Day wrote:Westbrook for Rondo+filler

Who says no?,assuming Rondo is back to his triple-double a night self.

OKC says no.

Return to Boston Celtics