Ed Pinkney wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:Gomes3PC wrote:Their curves are at much different stages though, so I don't think they're mutually exclusive. Len is 23, has three years and 3,000+ minutes of NBA action under his belt, Zizic...does not have any of those.
Zizic's looking great in Euro league, but so far Len has showed more scoring potential in Phoenix than Zizic was expected to have when we drafted him. Would be very happy to have both, but the only way we get Len is if Phoenix doesn't want to commit to him financially, or is worried about his injuries, or wants help at a different position, or wants to dump money like Chandler's in the bargain. "And/or", actually, for that list.
I'm big on Len, though I do remember being thrilled when we got Chris Mihm, because of his rebounding rate at the time- but he never put it all the way together.
I guess my main point was getting Len would probably cost valuable assets, but Zizic is already in the fold. So is it really worthwhile going after someone like Len if his game/upside/role is quite similar to someone who hopefully will be on the team next season and getting minutes?
Of course. The cost of acquiring mobile 7-footers who don't have feet for hands is high, regardless of how much of their potential they have realized. If we acquire a guy like Len, fans are going to have a lot of heartburn about the price we pay. Look at how long and how large a commitment Toronto has had to make to Valanciunas - this is his fifth year and may finally be the time where he truly breaks out.














