Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
-
jirrit
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,169
- And1: 4,663
- Joined: Mar 01, 2011
- Location: Belgium
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
we definately missed jae
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
- Shak_Celts
- Forum Mod - Celtics

- Posts: 50,568
- And1: 64,441
- Joined: Feb 07, 2016
-
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
BAEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
- Shak_Celts
- Forum Mod - Celtics

- Posts: 50,568
- And1: 64,441
- Joined: Feb 07, 2016
-
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
ET is BEASTING!!
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
-
Afam
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,148
- And1: 8,437
- Joined: Nov 29, 2011
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
If the Celtics keeping missing free throws, it's going to come back and hurt them.
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
- Shak_Celts
- Forum Mod - Celtics

- Posts: 50,568
- And1: 64,441
- Joined: Feb 07, 2016
-
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
why is ET out?
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
-
jirrit
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,169
- And1: 4,663
- Joined: Mar 01, 2011
- Location: Belgium
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
Afam wrote:If the Celtics keeping missing free throws, it's going to come back and hurt them.
IT and Jae got this
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
-
London2Boston
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,128
- And1: 13,003
- Joined: Apr 14, 2014
-
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
Portland boos everything it seems.
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
-
Smitty731
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 21,397
- And1: 25,002
- Joined: Feb 09, 2014
-
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
The whole team seems more locked in and comfortable with Crowder back. Stevens is back to the rotation that was working so well right before Crowder got hurt. Playing the core 9 guys.
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
-
Afam
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,148
- And1: 8,437
- Joined: Nov 29, 2011
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
jirrit wrote:Afam wrote:If the Celtics keeping missing free throws, it's going to come back and hurt them.
IT and Jae got this
I hope so.
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
- Shak_Celts
- Forum Mod - Celtics

- Posts: 50,568
- And1: 64,441
- Joined: Feb 07, 2016
-
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
IN YOUR MOUFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
- Fantaxp7
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,662
- And1: 3,794
- Joined: Aug 05, 2010
- Location: Boston
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
I almost forgot how good we are when healthy....almost
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
-
London2Boston
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,128
- And1: 13,003
- Joined: Apr 14, 2014
-
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
These boys are locked in. IT is hype lol
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
- Parliament10
- Forum Mod - Celtics

- Posts: 51,970
- And1: 61,232
- Joined: Jul 24, 2009
-
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
Smitty731 wrote:The whole team seems more locked in and comfortable with Crowder back. Stevens is back to the rotation that was working so well right before Crowder got hurt. Playing the core 9 guys.
Crowder's presence really makes a difference. His performance, is icing on the cake.
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."
~ Jayson Tatum
Nothing is given."
~ Jayson Tatum
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
-
jirrit
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,169
- And1: 4,663
- Joined: Mar 01, 2011
- Location: Belgium
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
jirrit wrote:Afam wrote:If the Celtics keeping missing free throws, it's going to come back and hurt them.
IT and Jae got this
Love to say I told you so
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
-
Afam
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,148
- And1: 8,437
- Joined: Nov 29, 2011
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
IT 3. This team really missed Jae Crowder. The Celtics operates like a unit, so you can't have any missing pieces ,or it wouldn't work well together .
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
-
PierceFan4ever
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,807
- And1: 41,926
- Joined: Dec 17, 2011
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
This team looks locked in. It's crazy how Crowder changes everything.
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
- Shak_Celts
- Forum Mod - Celtics

- Posts: 50,568
- And1: 64,441
- Joined: Feb 07, 2016
-
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
GET THAT OUT OF HEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
-
Marvel
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,124
- And1: 14,674
- Joined: Apr 23, 2010
-
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
Defense Marcus...
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
- Shak_Celts
- Forum Mod - Celtics

- Posts: 50,568
- And1: 64,441
- Joined: Feb 07, 2016
-
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
PierceFan4ever wrote:This team looks locked in. It's crazy how Crowder changes everything.
can't wait for min restriction to end
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
-
Banks2Pierce
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,783
- And1: 5,324
- Joined: Feb 23, 2004
-
Re: Celtics (43-31) @ Trail Blazers (39-36)
It's not even necessarily Crowder specifically, though he is very good. It's that we don't have to deal with the Zeller and Rozier minutes.





