CelticFaninLBC wrote:Simoms is a good player. Can't just salary dump him.
Sure you can. The Nets can have him tomorrow for a first round pick
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
CelticFaninLBC wrote:Simoms is a good player. Can't just salary dump him.
Curmudgeon wrote:CelticFaninLBC wrote:Simoms is a good player. Can't just salary dump him.
Sure you can. The Nets can have him tomorrow for a first round pick
hugepatsfan wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:CelticFaninLBC wrote:Simoms is a good player. Can't just salary dump him.
Sure you can. The Nets can have him tomorrow for a first round pick
We shouldn't give up a 1st to dump him. Make a series of trades to deal the money down gradually and then dump the spart parts leftover at the cost of just 2nds.
Curmudgeon wrote:CelticFaninLBC wrote:Simoms is a good player. Can't just salary dump him.
Sure you can. The Nets can have him tomorrow for a first round pick
ajones9219 wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:CelticFaninLBC wrote:Simoms is a good player. Can't just salary dump him.
Sure you can. The Nets can have him tomorrow for a first round pick
He's a borderline all star level player. That would be dumb

Gant wrote:Gary Washburn:
The Celtics have until Sunday to pick up the option on JD Davison’s contract for 2025-26. Even if the Celtics do keep Davison, his $2.2 million would not become guaranteed until Jan. 10, 2026. Boston could pick up the option and add Davison to a potential trade to fill salary. The Celtics also have until Sunday to make a qualifying offer to two-way swingman Drew Peterson, who should get minutes with the team’s retooling this season. The Celtics also have an open two-way contract, a spot they could fill after summer league or even sooner with an undrafted player.
ajones9219 wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:CelticFaninLBC wrote:Simoms is a good player. Can't just salary dump him.
Sure you can. The Nets can have him tomorrow for a first round pick
He's a borderline all star level player. That would be dumb
flintsky21 wrote:Brad must really, REALLY love Al and Kornet that much. SMH. If they're both signing more than vet mins then Brad would've been better off drafting 2 cost effective bigs with 28 and 32, who could end up being at least as good or better than Kornet.
Brad better get a decent big in return for Simons or we'd be rolling with one of the worst front courts in the league, unless the plan is to embrace the tank.
hugepatsfan wrote:ajones9219 wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:
Sure you can. The Nets can have him tomorrow for a first round pick
He's a borderline all star level player. That would be dumb
Simons? Borderline all star? Not even close.
Fierce1 wrote:flintsky21 wrote:Brad must really, REALLY love Al and Kornet that much. SMH. If they're both signing more than vet mins then Brad would've been better off drafting 2 cost effective bigs with 28 and 32, who could end up being at least as good or better than Kornet.
Brad better get a decent big in return for Simons or we'd be rolling with one of the worst front courts in the league, unless the plan is to embrace the tank.
Luke's getting rewarded.
Al should take 3.6m vets minimum.
Luke at 3 yrs 15m or 18m is good enough.
flintsky21 wrote:Fierce1 wrote:flintsky21 wrote:Brad must really, REALLY love Al and Kornet that much. SMH. If they're both signing more than vet mins then Brad would've been better off drafting 2 cost effective bigs with 28 and 32, who could end up being at least as good or better than Kornet.
Brad better get a decent big in return for Simons or we'd be rolling with one of the worst front courts in the league, unless the plan is to embrace the tank.
Luke's getting rewarded.
Al should take 3.6m vets minimum.
Luke at 3 yrs 15m or 18m is good enough.
If Luke is getting that then I'd rather give Queta and Tillman a shot.
I like Kornet but he's nothing more than a 20 mpg vet min backup big.
We shouldn't be forgoing the chance to see what we have in a young 20 ppg shooter like Simons just so we can keep Kornet lol
Asian Celtic wrote:Offloading Simons to re-sign an Old Man and a back up C which we can realistically only use after 2 years to contend does not look wise.
hugepatsfan wrote:How about...
MIL gets: Simons
BOS gets: Brook Lopez via S&T
It needs to be a 3 year deal for S&T to be legal, but 3rd year can be non guaranteed. Starting salary has to be $20,178,571 for MIL to be sending out enough salary here to match on Simons and I feel like you can make the salary declining. Let's say $20,178,571 in year 1, $19,821,429 in year 2 and then non guaranteed $20M in year 3. So a 3 year $60M deal that's really only 2 years, $40M.
Addresses the roster imbalance of having no 5s this year. Allows you to keep playing 5-out offense even with Porzingis and potentially Horford gone. Puts you closer to ducking the tax this year. Still keeps you under the tax next year.
yeleven11 wrote:Jake fischer:
League sources say Boston has been so focused on its accounting that it took an interesting approach with the No. 28 pick.
In considering various prospects to select with that late first-round turn Wednesday night, sources say that the Celtics initially looked for players who would be willing to accept 80% of their rookie scale contract salary, which is the lowest figure first-round picks can be paid.