ImageImageImage

Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

cl2117
General Manager
Posts: 8,900
And1: 7,524
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
 

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1261 » by cl2117 » Fri May 30, 2025 10:08 am

165bows wrote:
cl2117 wrote:I struggle to imagine the C's don't get outbid for Giannis. Bucks are only trading him if he asks out and at that stage there isn't much reason for the Bucks to not go straight to full tear-down. That's not the type of package that the C's would be offering if it's headlined by Brown et al., which is more of a "stay competitive" type offer.

The logical trade to me would be a Tatum/Giannis swap but the Bucks don't control their own pick in 2026 thanks to a swap owned by the Pelicans, which makes it less palatable for them. If they did they could take a year off and come back with a healthy Tatum/Dame and top 5 pick. C's on the other hand keep their foot on the gas and give Giannis the best roster he's ever had in his entire career. Swap a couple years of longevity for health.

There's just no circumstance I can work out where the Pelicans give up that pick without expecting a massive pay-off since the trade is predicated on the idea that Giannis has asked out so Bucks are highly likely lotto team and most likely a basement dweller. Bucks are short on assets which would have C's footing the majority of that bill and then it becomes Tatum++ for Giannis and I lose interest. Maybe if the Bucks were willing to fork over all their future draft capital for a roll of the dice on the 2026 tank, which honestly isn't that crazy of an idea if you're also getting Tatum, but again feels unlikely.

Maybe there's a world in which Bucks decide to take a Tatum/Giannis swap anyway because it's just one down year and then they have a franchise cornerstone coming back, something rebuilding packages can only hope to one day become, and I'd take that swap if they were up for it. It'd pain me but I'd take it.

Jrue/Pritchard/ Davison
White/ Walker/ #32
Brown/ Hauser / Scheierman
Giannis/ Walsh / #28
KP/ Horford/ Queta/ Luke?

That's the best team Giannis has ever had. The defense and the shooting around him would be phenomenal. His ability to take it to the basket in crunch time would get us out of our iso funk. Either he's getting doubled and shooters are open or you've got Giannis with a defender on an island.

The more I think about it the more I think the Bucks could talk themselves into it if they had no other choice and Giannis wants out. The Tatum injury is tough to gauge but if he does come back 100% it's the best value you're going to get straight up for Giannis. You can go with some picks and high upside guys but there is no guarantee they become Tatum who is just on the outside looking in at the MVP race perennially. I know the Luka trade is an aberration but it does remind you that crazier things have happened.

Bucks are totally screwed there is no way you even contemplate Tatum for Giannis. They don’t control their own picks for three years in a row and more after that so they absolutely can’t trade Giannis for young guys as the odds of having one pan out SGA style is extremely low.

We complain about KP but he’s won more playoff games in Boston than Giannis has in Milwaukee in that time. Guy is always broken down at the end of the season.

Imo OKC is one of the obvious other trade partners but if I’m Okc why do I make that trade? They are already running rough shod over the league and look poised to do it again next year before running into the same $ issues the year after that. So they don’t need him but want to get older and more expensive more quickly? Houston is there but again they don’t have good players to send for the immediate future and they’d have to send Thompson imo which their fans don’t even want.

So this is not me saying ‘ooh they have to send him to Boston’ I didn’t even want to talk about the guy and said so even though I’ve been pretty sure he’d be on the move since I thought the much stronger play was holding out for the chance Jokic becomes available the same way.

But a lot of these details and more are why we are seeing reports with Boston’s name on it because they solve a ton of problems for both parties. No way we bail them out and send Tatum for an older expensive guy who has won two playoff games in three years.

I didn’t even want to talk about the guy but he’s either hoping to leverage Boston to get somewhere else like NYC or he’s hoping to get bailed out and follow Jrue in which case you start to think about it but I don’t make offer A at all and prob not even offer B either.

I think a big part of Giannis breaking down is the fact that he's propping so much up. If he had a better supporting cast he'd be more durable, play less minutes, not have to carry the entire team on his back.

He only won 1 playoff game this year but he averaged 33/15/7 in the series on good efficiency. He wasn't why they lost that series. The guy lives up to the nickname, he's a freak. Now replace Dame/Kuzma/Portis/Trent with Jrue/White/KP/Brown and a bench featuring the 6th man of the year and see if that series turns out differently.

I think there will be some surprising teams coming out of the woodworks if Giannis does get put on the block. And I don't think the Bucks not owning their future would preclude them from going straight into a rebuild. If they can get a package with a high pick this year and some picks with upside in the future, they can tear this thing down knowing they've got things still in the pipeline even if they don't control their own.

They can absolutely choose to stay competitive and take a Brown et al. package but without additional assets that team isn't making waves in the playoffs in my opinion (even with a healthy Dame next year). I think in that circumstance they take a Houston or OKC package with younger/cheaper/worse options with upside in addition to some picks and go the middle route committing neither to full rebuild or tear-down. Probably a scrappy play-in team for the next 2-3 years unless they hit on a pick or one of the guys they get back makes a huge leap. At that stage they're back into having control of their own future and can re-assess.

If they were on board though I swap Tatum for Giannis without question. Tatum's injury is scary. I have the highest of hopes and it seems like things are shaping up to put him in as good a position as possible to come back at 100%, but we just don't know. Giannis is an absolute beast and freak and will be able to play with the championship core we've already got for next year. I'm taking the bird in the hand. He's older but again he's a freak, he could easily play like LeBron far beyond what an average NBA player can. I also think he's a great fit for the current team as well. If ownership foots the bill I could see us in the Finals the next 2-3 years straight. I'll take that and worry about the rest later.
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 15,813
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1262 » by Fierce1 » Fri May 30, 2025 10:20 am

cl2117 wrote:
165bows wrote:
cl2117 wrote:I struggle to imagine the C's don't get outbid for Giannis. Bucks are only trading him if he asks out and at that stage there isn't much reason for the Bucks to not go straight to full tear-down. That's not the type of package that the C's would be offering if it's headlined by Brown et al., which is more of a "stay competitive" type offer.

The logical trade to me would be a Tatum/Giannis swap but the Bucks don't control their own pick in 2026 thanks to a swap owned by the Pelicans, which makes it less palatable for them. If they did they could take a year off and come back with a healthy Tatum/Dame and top 5 pick. C's on the other hand keep their foot on the gas and give Giannis the best roster he's ever had in his entire career. Swap a couple years of longevity for health.

There's just no circumstance I can work out where the Pelicans give up that pick without expecting a massive pay-off since the trade is predicated on the idea that Giannis has asked out so Bucks are highly likely lotto team and most likely a basement dweller. Bucks are short on assets which would have C's footing the majority of that bill and then it becomes Tatum++ for Giannis and I lose interest. Maybe if the Bucks were willing to fork over all their future draft capital for a roll of the dice on the 2026 tank, which honestly isn't that crazy of an idea if you're also getting Tatum, but again feels unlikely.

Maybe there's a world in which Bucks decide to take a Tatum/Giannis swap anyway because it's just one down year and then they have a franchise cornerstone coming back, something rebuilding packages can only hope to one day become, and I'd take that swap if they were up for it. It'd pain me but I'd take it.

Jrue/Pritchard/ Davison
White/ Walker/ #32
Brown/ Hauser / Scheierman
Giannis/ Walsh / #28
KP/ Horford/ Queta/ Luke?

That's the best team Giannis has ever had. The defense and the shooting around him would be phenomenal. His ability to take it to the basket in crunch time would get us out of our iso funk. Either he's getting doubled and shooters are open or you've got Giannis with a defender on an island.

The more I think about it the more I think the Bucks could talk themselves into it if they had no other choice and Giannis wants out. The Tatum injury is tough to gauge but if he does come back 100% it's the best value you're going to get straight up for Giannis. You can go with some picks and high upside guys but there is no guarantee they become Tatum who is just on the outside looking in at the MVP race perennially. I know the Luka trade is an aberration but it does remind you that crazier things have happened.

Bucks are totally screwed there is no way you even contemplate Tatum for Giannis. They don’t control their own picks for three years in a row and more after that so they absolutely can’t trade Giannis for young guys as the odds of having one pan out SGA style is extremely low.

We complain about KP but he’s won more playoff games in Boston than Giannis has in Milwaukee in that time. Guy is always broken down at the end of the season.

Imo OKC is one of the obvious other trade partners but if I’m Okc why do I make that trade? They are already running rough shod over the league and look poised to do it again next year before running into the same $ issues the year after that. So they don’t need him but want to get older and more expensive more quickly? Houston is there but again they don’t have good players to send for the immediate future and they’d have to send Thompson imo which their fans don’t even want.

So this is not me saying ‘ooh they have to send him to Boston’ I didn’t even want to talk about the guy and said so even though I’ve been pretty sure he’d be on the move since I thought the much stronger play was holding out for the chance Jokic becomes available the same way.

But a lot of these details and more are why we are seeing reports with Boston’s name on it because they solve a ton of problems for both parties. No way we bail them out and send Tatum for an older expensive guy who has won two playoff games in three years.

I didn’t even want to talk about the guy but he’s either hoping to leverage Boston to get somewhere else like NYC or he’s hoping to get bailed out and follow Jrue in which case you start to think about it but I don’t make offer A at all and prob not even offer B either.

I think a big part of Giannis breaking down is the fact that he's propping so much up. If he had a better supporting cast he'd be more durable, play less minutes, not have to carry the entire team on his back.

He only won 1 playoff game this year but he averaged 33/15/7 in the series on good efficiency. He wasn't why they lost that series. The guy lives up to the nickname, he's a freak. Now replace Dame/Kuzma/Portis/Trent with Jrue/White/KP/Brown and a bench featuring the 6th man of the year and see if that series turns out differently.

I think there will be some surprising teams coming out of the woodworks if Giannis does get put on the block. And I don't think the Bucks not owning their future would preclude them from going straight into a rebuild. If they can get a package with a high pick this year and some picks with upside in the future, they can tear this thing down knowing they've got things still in the pipeline even if they don't control their own.

They can absolutely choose to stay competitive and take a Brown et al. package but without additional assets that team isn't making waves in the playoffs in my opinion (even with a healthy Dame next year). I think in that circumstance they take a Houston or OKC package with younger/cheaper/worse options with upside in addition to some picks and go the middle route committing neither to full rebuild or tear-down. Probably a scrappy play-in team for the next 2-3 years unless they hit on a pick or one of the guys they get back makes a huge leap. At that stage they're back into having control of their own future and can re-assess.

If they were on board though I swap Tatum for Giannis without question. Tatum's injury is scary. I have the highest of hopes and it seems like things are shaping up to put him in as good a position as possible to come back at 100%, but we just don't know. Giannis is an absolute beast and freak and will be able to play with the championship core we've already got for next year. I'm taking the bird in the hand. He's older but again he's a freak, he could easily play like LeBron far beyond what an average NBA player can. I also think he's a great fit for the current team as well. If ownership foots the bill I could see us in the Finals the next 2-3 years straight. I'll take that and worry about the rest later.

You're forgetting something.

Swapping Tat for Giannis does not solve the immediate problem of luxury tax.

In fact, Giannis will be 3m more expensive than Tatum next season.

So Jrue and KP will still have to go.

That leaves you with Giannis, JB, and White as the Big 3.

Celtics and Brad are not Mavs and Nico.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 15,813
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1263 » by Fierce1 » Fri May 30, 2025 10:22 am

Imagine if the Bulls traded Michael Jordan back in 1985 when Jordan broke his foot and had to miss 64 games.
cl2117
General Manager
Posts: 8,900
And1: 7,524
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
 

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1264 » by cl2117 » Fri May 30, 2025 10:39 am

Fierce1 wrote:You're forgetting something.

Swapping Tat for Giannis does not solve the immediate problem of luxury tax.

In fact, Giannis will be 3m more expensive than Tatum next season.

So Jrue and KP will still have to go.

That leaves you with Giannis, JB, and White as the Big 3.

Celtics and Brad are not Mavs and Nico.

That's why I say "if ownership is willing to foot the bill". The cost is insane but I think that roster after a straight swap of Tatum for Giannis is good enough to warrant paying that kind of money for at least one season. Even still if we had to lose one of Jrue/KP, I'd still be on board with it (we can duck the aprons without getting rid of both, just not the tax and that'll be good enough for now).

Fierce1 wrote:Imagine if the Bulls traded Michael Jordan back in 1985 when Jordan broke his foot and had to miss 64 games.


The closest comparison would be the Warriors trading KD for LeBron after losing against Toronto in the finals. Durant was a FA and walked to BKN, so not the same, but trading a 30 year old superstar for a 34 year old superstar. KD missed the whole following year and LeBron came 2nd in MVP voting and won a championship with the Lakers. Subsequently KD has come back putting up the same kind of numbers but missing a lot more games and LeBron has had some pretty impressive seasons but slowly slipped out of MVP conversations and into a consistent 3rd team all-nba guy.

C's would be trading 27 year old Tatum for a 30 year old Giannis. C's will be able to squeeze a lot more out of Giannis than the Lakers have gotten out of LeBron despite his insane longevity.

It genuinely could be a win/win if we get a couple banners out of it and Bucks don't recede back to mediocrity.
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 15,813
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1265 » by Fierce1 » Fri May 30, 2025 11:12 am

cl2117 wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:You're forgetting something.

Swapping Tat for Giannis does not solve the immediate problem of luxury tax.

In fact, Giannis will be 3m more expensive than Tatum next season.

So Jrue and KP will still have to go.

That leaves you with Giannis, JB, and White as the Big 3.

Celtics and Brad are not Mavs and Nico.

That's why I say "if ownership is willing to foot the bill". The cost is insane but I think that roster after a straight swap of Tatum for Giannis is good enough to warrant paying that kind of money for at least one season. Even still if we had to lose one of Jrue/KP, I'd still be on board with it (we can duck the aprons without getting rid of both, just not the tax and that'll be good enough for now).

Fierce1 wrote:Imagine if the Bulls traded Michael Jordan back in 1985 when Jordan broke his foot and had to miss 64 games.


The closest comparison would be the Warriors trading KD for LeBron after losing against Toronto in the finals. Durant was a FA and walked to BKN, so not the same, but trading a 30 year old superstar for a 34 year old superstar. KD missed the whole following year and LeBron came 2nd in MVP voting and won a championship with the Lakers. Subsequently KD has come back putting up the same kind of numbers but missing a lot more games and LeBron has had some pretty impressive seasons but slowly slipped out of MVP conversations and into a consistent 3rd team all-nba guy.

C's would be trading 27 year old Tatum for a 30 year old Giannis. C's will be able to squeeze a lot more out of Giannis than the Lakers have gotten out of LeBron despite his insane longevity.

It genuinely could be a win/win if we get a couple banners out of it and Bucks don't recede back to mediocrity.

If it's purely basketball then that's plausible.

But regarding the tax, Shams and Windhorst already said the Celtics will not pay the 500m payroll, so the "if owners are willing to pay" ship has sailed.

Regarding Tatum for Giannis swap, you really think marketability will not factor in to the decision?

Tatum's #0 jersey is one of the top selling jerseys in the NBA.

Every arena, outside TD Garden, you see Celtic fans wearing Tatum jerseys.

So marketability is a big factor because the NBA is a business.

And dumping Tatum because he's injured is a classless move.
cl2117
General Manager
Posts: 8,900
And1: 7,524
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
 

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1266 » by cl2117 » Fri May 30, 2025 11:21 am

Fierce1 wrote:If it's purely basketball then that's plausible.

But regarding the tax, Shams and Windhorst already said the Celtics will not pay the 500m payroll, so the "if owners are willing to pay" ship has sailed.

Regarding Tatum for Giannis swap, you really think marketability will not factor in to the decision?

Tatum's #0 jersey is one of the top selling jerseys in the NBA.

Every arena, outside TD Garden, you see Celtic fans wearing Tatum jerseys.

So marketability is a big factor because the NBA is a business.

And dumping Tatum because he's injured is a classless move.

They've said they won't pay the tax in the context of Tatum being injured. With a healthy Giannis in tow, that might be different. And they may still drive to duck the aprons, but that kind of move is a seismic shift that would change everything, so what they've said in the past is somewhat irrelevant.

Do you not think Giannis is marketable? The Green Greek Freak would surpass Tatum in jersey sales in no-time.

Swapping one MVP candidate for anther isn't a classless move. I agree it's somewhat sacrilegious but it's not like an affront to Tatum.
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,627
And1: 14,444
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1267 » by 165bows » Fri May 30, 2025 12:01 pm

Hell no Tatum for Giannis.
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,066
And1: 5,891
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1268 » by Larry_Russell » Fri May 30, 2025 12:20 pm

We are getting Giannis this offseason arent we.

Its happening boys and gals and all those inbetween.


Its Happening
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 15,813
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1269 » by Fierce1 » Fri May 30, 2025 12:24 pm

cl2117 wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:If it's purely basketball then that's plausible.

But regarding the tax, Shams and Windhorst already said the Celtics will not pay the 500m payroll, so the "if owners are willing to pay" ship has sailed.

Regarding Tatum for Giannis swap, you really think marketability will not factor in to the decision?

Tatum's #0 jersey is one of the top selling jerseys in the NBA.

Every arena, outside TD Garden, you see Celtic fans wearing Tatum jerseys.

So marketability is a big factor because the NBA is a business.

And dumping Tatum because he's injured is a classless move.

They've said they won't pay the tax in the context of Tatum being injured. With a healthy Giannis in tow, that might be different. And they may still drive to duck the aprons, but that kind of move is a seismic shift that would change everything, so what they've said in the past is somewhat irrelevant.

Do you not think Giannis is marketable? The Green Greek Freak would surpass Tatum in jersey sales in no-time.

Swapping one MVP candidate for anther isn't a classless move. I agree it's somewhat sacrilegious but it's not like an affront to Tatum.

1. Boston does not do sacreligious.
That's just not the Boston Celtics way.

2. Even before Tatum got hurt, Shams already reported Celtics will make moves to avoid the 500m payroll.

3. Tatum is red, white, and blue.
He's the American hero.
No greek can beat that!
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 15,813
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1270 » by Fierce1 » Fri May 30, 2025 12:28 pm

No owner will operate at a loss, especially after spending 6 billion on the team.

Back in 2024, Celtic revenue was reported to be around 400m+.

Spending 500m when your revenue is only 400m+ is not how you do business.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 15,813
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1271 » by Fierce1 » Fri May 30, 2025 12:33 pm

Before Tatum's injury, ESPN was showing a Superman commercial, featuring Tatum as Superman.

Why didn't ESPN pick Giannis to be Superman?

So there's that.
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,066
And1: 5,891
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1272 » by Larry_Russell » Fri May 30, 2025 12:33 pm

165bows wrote:Hell no Tatum for Giannis.



They will be paired together.



Jrue Holiday to Houston (Reed Sheppard and #10)

Jalen Brown and #28 to the Pelicans (McCollum, #7, Herb Jones, 2026 Bucks pick, 2027 bucks pick)

Reed Sheppard, CJ McCollum, #7, #10, #32, 2026 bucks 1st, 2027 bucks 1st, 2026 Boston 2nd, 2027 Boston 1st, 20217 Boston 2nd to Milwaukee

Giannis and Herb Jones to Boston

Houston actually saves money while adding a great PG to replace FVV
Pelicans add an ALL NBA level talent at a very fair cost (imo) Murray, Brown, Murphy3 and Zion is a great core.

Milwaukee adds a 2 lotto picks, gets their own picks back, adds Reed and a bunch of seconds and an expiring. (8 total picks a young player with potential and an expiring)

Boston adds Giannis and a starter in Herb

White/Pritchard
Scheirman
Herb Jones/Walsh
Giannis/Hauser
Kristaps/Kornet/Queta
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 67,658
And1: 68,909
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1273 » by Celts17Pride » Fri May 30, 2025 12:35 pm

Larry_Russell wrote:We are getting Giannis this offseason arent we.

Its happening boys and gals and all those inbetween.


Its Happening

LOL!! Listen to Windy's full segment. Celtics are not getting Giannis.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 15,813
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1274 » by Fierce1 » Fri May 30, 2025 12:40 pm

What were the problems the Cs encountered against NY?

Scoring in crunch time and someone who can score not shooting a 3, right?

Get KD.

Remove White, Jrue, and KP and we'll have a Big 3 of JT, JB, and KD.

A 2-year window.
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,066
And1: 5,891
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1275 » by Larry_Russell » Fri May 30, 2025 12:56 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Larry_Russell wrote:We are getting Giannis this offseason arent we.

Its happening boys and gals and all those inbetween.


Its Happening

LOL!! Listen to Windy's full segment. Celtics are not getting Giannis.



Windy is a clutch/lebron paid mouthpiece.

I dont believe anything that douche states about Celtics.

I will have you know I tweeted Giannis a wrek ago about him joining the Celtics via demanded trade and he has yet to dispute or decline.....so there is that.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 67,658
And1: 68,909
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1276 » by Celts17Pride » Fri May 30, 2025 1:42 pm

I think Brad Stevens and the Celtics strategy is going to be try to stay competitive in 2025/2026 while reducing payroll but make sure the "books" are pretty clear for 2026/2027 when the 1st apron is projected to be $216 million and the 2nd apron projected to be $229 million. That means moving off of Holiday and Hauser's long term deals by acquiring expiring contracts or draft capital. They may keep KP at least until the trade deadline next year.

In 2026/2027 the Celtics could have a core of players Tatum, Brown, White, Pritchard, Scheierman, Kornet, Queta, (2) 1st round draft picks for about $175 million.

Brad Stevens would have a lot room to add to that core and may even extend players like Gafford, Washington if they ever came over in a Holiday trade. I think the Celtics would love to get below the 2nd apron next year but I'm not sure it's a priority. I think it's a priority for 2026/2027 and the way you do it is moving Holiday and Hauser.

Just one person's opinion.
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,066
And1: 5,891
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1277 » by Larry_Russell » Fri May 30, 2025 2:31 pm

Jalen Brown to the Rockets

Jalen Green, #28 and Jock Landale to the Wizards

Bilal Coulibaly, Jabari Smith Jr, Marcus Smart, #6 and #10 to Boston (saves 12 mill)

Flip Jrue for the rest of the savings needed
Package 6 and #32 to move up to get Tre Johnson


White/Pritch/???
Tre Johnson/Scheierman/???
Coulibaly/Hauser/Walsh
Smith Jr/#10/???
Kristaps/Kornet/Queta
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 21,860
And1: 23,510
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1278 » by playa-hater » Fri May 30, 2025 2:36 pm

New rumor or not, I am not sure but Hoopshype suggesting that the Pels will be looking to trade Zion.

And LAC is indeed rumored to want Jrue.

So let's get off of the Tatum for Giannis talk and get back to real possibilities :nod:

Brown for Zion ?? Should save us some money.. Who says No??

Zion for #2 ???

Zion to Brooklyn for so many of their picks??

What would a Jrue to LAC look like?? Don't really like anyone they have.
There is no prize for coming so close Do something!
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,066
And1: 5,891
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1279 » by Larry_Russell » Fri May 30, 2025 2:48 pm

Big trade of the day. (Just in case Brad is reading and needs ideas)

Jrue to Dallas (discussed ad nauseum)

Kristaps, Knect and #28 to the Pelicans (Actually think he is a perfect center for them over there)

Kelly Olynyk, Dwight Powell, Sam Hauser (TPE) to Lakers ( add 2 centers, and 2 shooters)


Daniel Gafford, PJ Washington, Herb Jones and Jared Vanderbilt to Boston (saves 19 million, Cutting JD Davidson and Tilman saves another 5)



White/Pritchard
Brown/Scheierman
Herb Jones/Walsh
PJ Washington/Jared Vanderbilt
Daniel Gafford/Kornett/Queta

Not a very deep team, but it very versatile. Need to pick up a vet combo guard and another strong forward. Then can compete until Tatum returns.

available combo guard that might sign a minimum:
Seth Curry
Delon Wright
Cam PAyne
Monte Morris
Dalanto Banton
Patty Mills
Alec Burks

Possible strong forwards:
Chris Boucher
JaeSean Tate
Taurean Prince
Craig
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,066
And1: 5,891
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1280 » by Larry_Russell » Fri May 30, 2025 2:50 pm

playa-hater wrote:New rumor or not, I am not sure but Hoopshype suggesting that the Pels will be looking to trade Zion.

And LAC is indeed rumored to want Jrue.

So let's get off of the Tatum for Giannis talk and get back to real possibilities :nod:

Brown for Zion ?? Should save us some money.. Who says No??

Zion for #2 ???

Zion to Brooklyn for so many of their picks??

What would a Jrue to LAC look like?? Don't really like anyone they have.



RE: CLipper and Jrue
Only person I would have interest in is Zubac or Powell, but the offer would probably be Bogdan and Jones Jr, which, imo, is not good enough.

Return to Boston Celtics