Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:WHAT!!! Just hit my 500th post!!!!
And it only took you 10 years
Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, canman1971

Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:WHAT!!! Just hit my 500th post!!!!
SuperDeluxe wrote:Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:WHAT!!! Just hit my 500th post!!!!
And it only took you 10 years
Who-rod wrote:Celtic Esquire wrote:FeedReed wrote:this really sucks. people are actually valuing 2 role players and 1 draft pick over what the celtics need most? ugh. would've been a fantastic trade for the c's. if i was the rockets gm i wouldn't do it either unless it was a 2014 unprotected pick.
Asik is a better rebounding version of Kendrick Perkins. No thanks.
Full link to stats:
http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/8370/ckm2.png
http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/5904/ng0l.png
Asik is a MUCH better rebounding version of Perkins. He also has better hands than Perk, which isn't saying much, since Perk has the worst hands I have ever seen.
Slartibartfast wrote:Celtic Esquire wrote:FeedReed wrote:this really sucks. people are actually valuing 2 role players and 1 draft pick over what the celtics need most? ugh. would've been a fantastic trade for the c's. if i was the rockets gm i wouldn't do it either unless it was a 2014 unprotected pick.
Asik is a better rebounding version of Kendrick Perkins. No thanks.
Full link to stats:
http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/8370/ckm2.png
http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/5904/ng0l.png
A better version of Perk at his best? How is that bad?

SuperDeluxe wrote:ryaningf wrote:Deal always seemed too good to be true from the Cs perspective....people complaining that bass + lee + 1st rounder is too much for Asik, hey, I'm a homer too but let's be realistic Danny would have traded them 6 months ago if he could have found takers.
That would've been selling low, as they were both sucking badly last year. This year they are both playing pretty well, to the point that I wouldn't mind keeping them. The fairness of the deal after the addition of a mid-first-round pick would depend on how the drafted player turns out to be. Is that player a Jared Sullinger/Rajon Rondo type? Or is he a Gerald Green/Marcus Banks type? Would you do Bass/Lee/Sullinger for Asik?
Celtic Esquire wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:Celtic Esquire wrote:
Asik is a better rebounding version of Kendrick Perkins. No thanks.
Full link to stats:
http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/8370/ckm2.png
http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/5904/ng0l.png
A better version of Perk at his best? How is that bad?
It's bad when we are giving up two rotation players plus a #1 pick (possibly a 2014 pick according to reports) for a better rebounding version of Perkins.
ryaningf wrote:SuperDeluxe wrote:ryaningf wrote:Deal always seemed too good to be true from the Cs perspective....people complaining that bass + lee + 1st rounder is too much for Asik, hey, I'm a homer too but let's be realistic Danny would have traded them 6 months ago if he could have found takers.
That would've been selling low, as they were both sucking badly last year. This year they are both playing pretty well, to the point that I wouldn't mind keeping them. The fairness of the deal after the addition of a mid-first-round pick would depend on how the drafted player turns out to be. Is that player a Jared Sullinger/Rajon Rondo type? Or is he a Gerald Green/Marcus Banks type? Would you do Bass/Lee/Sullinger for Asik?
"Selling low"? Ha. More like paying someone to take out your trash. That's how depressed their value had become, you would have had to attach picks to make somebody take control of their contracts. 6 months later we almost trade them for a much better player? God, count your blessings and jump all over that. People crying over the loss of these 2 guys (both stand up individuals but severely limited basketball players) is pretty comical IMO.
Both are playing well this year. Congrats to them. Frankly, I see that as a function of Stevens' system and them having opportunities to do things they wouldn't have gotten to do with Paul and KG around. Same guys, better system and coach, and they're getting the opportunities but it doesn't mean they're actually better players or that I'd lose sleep over trading them. Hump and Brooks suck too but I'm pretty sure they'd look just as good with the minutes and confidence of Brad.
The issue of the 1st rounder is the only actual negotiation point because it's the only thing of VALUE that we'd be giving up in the proposed deal. If it wasn't the Clip pick (looking to 20 or higher) or a heavily protected Celtic first rounder in 2016 or beyond, I would have walked away. I agree with you that you think long and hard about giving up first rounders.
Captain_Caveman wrote:Houston gets a rude awakening on Asik's value, which is only going to go down from here.
Every day that passes is one day closer to him being a UFA and makes it more difficult for another team to offset his balloon payment next season. Plus, you know he's not going to take this well, lol. Probably going to become more toxic for them if he goes public with his displeasure, and the whole thing will likely become more of a distraction.
Plus, it hurts their ability to compete this year.
In conclusion...
GIF removed
Celtic Esquire wrote:FeedReed wrote:this really sucks. people are actually valuing 2 role players and 1 draft pick over what the celtics need most? ugh. would've been a fantastic trade for the c's. if i was the rockets gm i wouldn't do it either unless it was a 2014 unprotected pick.
Asik is a better rebounding version of Kendrick Perkins. No thanks.
Full link to stats:
http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/8370/ckm2.png
http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/5904/ng0l.png

sully00 wrote:Morey's problem is he doesn't have an offer.
SuperDeluxe wrote:I don't understand this demeaning of Morey. The guy is just doing the job he gets the big bucks for. He's not there to please fans of other teams, he's there to make the Rockets a better team. Judging by his track record, I'd say he's doing a pretty well.
Valid wrote:ryaningf wrote:SuperDeluxe wrote:That would've been selling low, as they were both sucking badly last year. This year they are both playing pretty well, to the point that I wouldn't mind keeping them. The fairness of the deal after the addition of a mid-first-round pick would depend on how the drafted player turns out to be. Is that player a Jared Sullinger/Rajon Rondo type? Or is he a Gerald Green/Marcus Banks type? Would you do Bass/Lee/Sullinger for Asik?
"Selling low"? Ha. More like paying someone to take out your trash. That's how depressed their value had become, you would have had to attach picks to make somebody take control of their contracts. 6 months later we almost trade them for a much better player? God, count your blessings and jump all over that. People crying over the loss of these 2 guys (both stand up individuals but severely limited basketball players) is pretty comical IMO.
Both are playing well this year. Congrats to them. Frankly, I see that as a function of Stevens' system and them having opportunities to do things they wouldn't have gotten to do with Paul and KG around. Same guys, better system and coach, and they're getting the opportunities but it doesn't mean they're actually better players or that I'd lose sleep over trading them. Hump and Brooks suck too but I'm pretty sure they'd look just as good with the minutes and confidence of Brad.
The issue of the 1st rounder is the only actual negotiation point because it's the only thing of VALUE that we'd be giving up in the proposed deal. If it wasn't the Clip pick (looking to 20 or higher) or a heavily protected Celtic first rounder in 2016 or beyond, I would have walked away. I agree with you that you think long and hard about giving up first rounders.
I agree with your overall premise here, but Bass is not just having a career year. He is doing the exact same thing he did in his first two years here. It's just more noticeable this year because KG, PP and Rondo aren't around. If you want to be technical, his efficiency has taken a bit of a dip this year as opposed to last season. Take a look at the numbers.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... sbr01.html
Slartibartfast wrote:I have a gut feeling the deal still goes through.
ryaningf wrote:Valid wrote:ryaningf wrote:
"Selling low"? Ha. More like paying someone to take out your trash. That's how depressed their value had become, you would have had to attach picks to make somebody take control of their contracts. 6 months later we almost trade them for a much better player? God, count your blessings and jump all over that. People crying over the loss of these 2 guys (both stand up individuals but severely limited basketball players) is pretty comical IMO.
Both are playing well this year. Congrats to them. Frankly, I see that as a function of Stevens' system and them having opportunities to do things they wouldn't have gotten to do with Paul and KG around. Same guys, better system and coach, and they're getting the opportunities but it doesn't mean they're actually better players or that I'd lose sleep over trading them. Hump and Brooks suck too but I'm pretty sure they'd look just as good with the minutes and confidence of Brad.
The issue of the 1st rounder is the only actual negotiation point because it's the only thing of VALUE that we'd be giving up in the proposed deal. If it wasn't the Clip pick (looking to 20 or higher) or a heavily protected Celtic first rounder in 2016 or beyond, I would have walked away. I agree with you that you think long and hard about giving up first rounders.
I agree with your overall premise here, but Bass is not just having a career year. He is doing the exact same thing he did in his first two years here. It's just more noticeable this year because KG, PP and Rondo aren't around. If you want to be technical, his efficiency has taken a bit of a dip this year as opposed to last season. Take a look at the numbers.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... sbr01.html
Not sure where I said or implied he's having a career year, I just said he's the same player he's always been, just in a better role for him and with more opportunity and responsibility. We're probably saying the same thing. They've definitely given him more post up opportunities and put the ball in his hands in a much bigger decision making role (career high assist %) but yeah same old B Bass.