kuclas wrote:ermocrate wrote:kuclas wrote:
Sixers aren’t selling low on Fultz. That’s why they aren’t including him. It’s very hard to give up on such a high pick who shown he can beat players off the dribble. Fultz in limited time averaged 7 points/4 rebounds/3 assist in 18 minutes.
Ingram was completely lost his 1st season. He averaged l like 9.5 points 3 rebounds 2 assists on 28 minutes of play
Brown averaged 6 points 1 assist 3 rebounds in his first season playing 17 minutes.
Will see how Fultz does the second year.
Many Celtics fans were clearly frustrated with Brown his first season. He fell out of the rotation for a bit as well. And he barely played against the bulls after they went down 0-2 Remember that?
Still he hasn’t shown he can ball at high levels so for now it’s a “Bust level” being the first overall pick. The story is full of players who underplayed the first year and the got better and is full of players who underplayed the first year and continue that trend for their entire career. You just can’t “assume” that because Brown and Ingram got better automatically Fultz will, so right now they are far apart.
So Boston fans would agree brown was a bust after his 1st year?
And Fultz has shown he can take players off the dribble and to the rim.
During his rookie year we saw really solid play from Brown during the playoffs and saw growth from him during the season. His minutes were relatively limited due to intense competition from veterans more experienced in the system than anything else. That was not the case with Fultz.
What I assume is your point (that sometime players can have bad rookie years and grow into better players over time) is well taken. And perhaps Fultz can turn things around. But comparing Jaylen Brown's rookie season to Markelle Fultz' is comparing apples to crab apples.
























