I'm fine with the pick. I want the GM to take risks.
But other than being really hyped as teenaged prospect and having high motor, I dont see what this dude is projected to be. Doesn't really shoot it or play make. Our coach is known for burying guys who don't hit 3 pointers -- so how is the dude gonna play this yr?
If Hugo Gonzalez is a successful NBA player, what is a good comp for him if he hits his absolute ceiling in 7 years. Is he Alex Caruso?
I dont mind the pick. But this seems like an anti-mazzulla ball pick and a dude that is just unlikely to succeed and his curve is likely gonna mirror Jordan Walsh's development curve. This sounds like Im down on the pick, but I'm not that down on it, but it seems like a pick when the GM and coach are NOT on the same page. So Im not understanding it really
I just don't see the vision and I want to see the vision
aim2please wrote:Former Mavs analytics guy Jeremias Engelmann is a great read if you like analytics based approach to the NBA. I am subscribed to his substack.
His 2021 NBA draft board was one for the ages. Sengun, Wagner and Herb Jones in the top 5. Anyways, his board looks nothing like most public boards.
This year, guys he's a lot higher on: Murray-Boyles 3rd, Flemming 5th, Clayton Jr. 8th, Saraf 9th, Proctor 12th.
Guys he's lower on: Bailey 11th, Fears 16th, Maluach 17th, Queen 19th, Demin 22th, Johnson 23rd (his pick for most likely bust at the top of the draft), Coward 25th.
He never had Hugo as a 1st rounder this year.
Obviously, he can wrong on guys, but he's really good at understanding what archetype succeeds in the league.