ImageImageImage

Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1321 » by CelticFaninLBC » Tue Jan 7, 2014 8:32 pm

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
CelticFaninLBC wrote:Seems OKC will try to use their assets (Lamb, Jackson, Roberson, Jones, Dallas pick) to get someone like Aaron Affalo. Maybe Boston gets involved to help facilitate, as I doubt Orlando will want Perkins...


Perkins and Lamb to Boston, Afflalo and Bayless to OKC, Keith Bogans, and Crawford to Orlando. Would OKC do it?

Rondo/Pressey
Bradley/Lamb/Brooks
Green/Wallace/Bogans
Sullinger/Bass/Humphries
Perkins/Olynyk/Faverani


Afflalo's averaging 21 ppg on 42% shooting from 3, and is signed through 2015-16, @ $7.5 million per year, so he's pretty ideal for a cap conscious team like OKC... So OKC probably has to give up something like Reggie Jackson, their Dallas pick and a future 1st round pick to get Afflalo...

Maybe something like this works:

OKC Gets: Afflalo, Crawford (replaces Jackson as 6th man/instant offense) & Faverani (shaves $2 million of Boston's 2014-15 cap)
Boston Gets: Perk & Lamb
Orlando Gets: Bogans, Jackson, Dallas Pick and future pick from OKC
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1322 » by Valid » Tue Jan 7, 2014 8:47 pm

CelticFaninLBC wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
CelticFaninLBC wrote:Seems OKC will try to use their assets (Lamb, Jackson, Roberson, Jones, Dallas pick) to get someone like Aaron Affalo. Maybe Boston gets involved to help facilitate, as I doubt Orlando will want Perkins...


Perkins and Lamb to Boston, Afflalo and Bayless to OKC, Keith Bogans, and Crawford to Orlando. Would OKC do it?

Rondo/Pressey
Bradley/Lamb/Brooks
Green/Wallace/Bogans
Sullinger/Bass/Humphries
Perkins/Olynyk/Faverani


Afflalo's averaging 21 ppg on 42% shooting from 3, and is signed through 2015-16, @ $7.5 million per year, so he's pretty ideal for a cap conscious team like OKC... So OKC probably has to give up something like Reggie Jackson, their Dallas pick and a future 1st round pick to get Afflalo...

Maybe something like this works:

OKC Gets: Afflalo, Crawford (replaces Jackson as 6th man/instant offense) & Faverani (shaves $2 million of Boston's 2014-15 cap)
Boston Gets: Perk & Lamb
Orlando Gets: Bogans, Jackson, Dallas Pick and future pick from OKC

With Westbrook's season potentially in limbo, OKC isn't trading Jackson unless they are getting a real point guard in return. Jackson is much more important than just a sixth man to the Thunder right now.
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1323 » by CelticFaninLBC » Tue Jan 7, 2014 8:52 pm

Valid wrote:
CelticFaninLBC wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Perkins and Lamb to Boston, Afflalo and Bayless to OKC, Keith Bogans, and Crawford to Orlando. Would OKC do it?

Rondo/Pressey
Bradley/Lamb/Brooks
Green/Wallace/Bogans
Sullinger/Bass/Humphries
Perkins/Olynyk/Faverani


Afflalo's averaging 21 ppg on 42% shooting from 3, and is signed through 2015-16, @ $7.5 million per year, so he's pretty ideal for a cap conscious team like OKC... So OKC probably has to give up something like Reggie Jackson, their Dallas pick and a future 1st round pick to get Afflalo...

Maybe something like this works:

OKC Gets: Afflalo, Crawford (replaces Jackson as 6th man/instant offense) & Faverani (shaves $2 million of Boston's 2014-15 cap)
Boston Gets: Perk & Lamb
Orlando Gets: Bogans, Jackson, Dallas Pick and future pick from OKC

With Westbrook's season potentially in limbo, OKC isn't trading Jackson unless they are getting a real point guard in return. Jackson is much more important than just a sixth man to the Thunder right now.


They aren't winning anything, if Westbrook's out, and Jackson hits free agency in 2015. They'll have to move him soon just like the Clippers moved Eric Bledsoe.
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1324 » by Valid » Tue Jan 7, 2014 8:53 pm

CelticFaninLBC wrote:
Valid wrote:
CelticFaninLBC wrote:
Afflalo's averaging 21 ppg on 42% shooting from 3, and is signed through 2015-16, @ $7.5 million per year, so he's pretty ideal for a cap conscious team like OKC... So OKC probably has to give up something like Reggie Jackson, their Dallas pick and a future 1st round pick to get Afflalo...

Maybe something like this works:

OKC Gets: Afflalo, Crawford (replaces Jackson as 6th man/instant offense) & Faverani (shaves $2 million of Boston's 2014-15 cap)
Boston Gets: Perk & Lamb
Orlando Gets: Bogans, Jackson, Dallas Pick and future pick from OKC

With Westbrook's season potentially in limbo, OKC isn't trading Jackson unless they are getting a real point guard in return. Jackson is much more important than just a sixth man to the Thunder right now.


They aren't winning anything, if Westbrook's out, and Jackson hits free agency in 2015. They'll have to move him soon just like the Clippers moved Eric Bledsoe.

I highly doubt OKC is going to have a "we aren't winning anything" attitude, especially if they are also sending out Lamb whom are they very high on. There is a very good chance Lamb ends up being better than Afflalo.
24istheLAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,798
And1: 5,031
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1325 » by 24istheLAW » Tue Jan 7, 2014 8:56 pm

Valid wrote:I highly doubt OKC is going to have a "we aren't winning anything" attitude, especially if they are also sending out Lamb whom are they very high on. There is a very good chance Lamb ends up being better than Afflalo.


Yeah, Lamb is (or should be) untouchable.

But Roberson? I would think a Humphries for Perkins swap could shake him loose. They could very well be winning things so Humphries would help their cause. They get a better player and the salary space back to resign Sefolosha. Which would make it harder to find minutes for Roberson long term anyway.

sully00 wrote:OKC can just amnesty Perkins if they want to they certainly aren't going to throw away good cheap young players to get rid of him.


They can't amnesty him. They'd have to pay him still. Had they been willing to go that route, wouldn't it have happened by now? They have Westbrook, Jackson and Lamb, plus Sefolosha who you can resign this way. Surely a 5th guard (Roberson) isn't so important as to preclude the double whammy of getting a better big man and cap space?
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1326 » by Slartibartfast » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:05 pm

BleedGreen1989 wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:I'm just happy the Cavs went for Deng instead of Pau so I can keep my Pau trade fantasies alive!

Come on Lakers, Pau for Hump, Bogans and Faverani. Heck we'll even throw in Bayless for Blake as a side deal.


If Ainge DOES decide to be a buyer, I would love Pau Gasol.

I'm gonna throw this up on the main board for giggles.


Pau as a free agent would be ok too, if the Lakers are asking for real assets for him.

If we dump Bass for expirings, we could offer Pau something like 3/$36.
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,023
And1: 3,904
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1327 » by BleedGreen1989 » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:09 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:I'm just happy the Cavs went for Deng instead of Pau so I can keep my Pau trade fantasies alive!

Come on Lakers, Pau for Hump, Bogans and Faverani. Heck we'll even throw in Bayless for Blake as a side deal.


If Ainge DOES decide to be a buyer, I would love Pau Gasol.

I'm gonna throw this up on the main board for giggles.


Pau as a free agent would be ok too, if the Lakers are asking for real assets for him.

If we dump Bass for expirings, we could offer Pau something like 3/$36.


Eh, I wouldn't love him that much lol.

Most I would likely offer is 3/$24mill.
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1328 » by KJandHondo35 » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:30 pm

24istheLAW wrote:
Valid wrote:I highly doubt OKC is going to have a "we aren't winning anything" attitude, especially if they are also sending out Lamb whom are they very high on. There is a very good chance Lamb ends up being better than Afflalo.


Yeah, Lamb is (or should be) untouchable.

But Roberson? I would think a Humphries for Perkins swap could shake him loose. They could very well be winning things so Humphries would help their cause. They get a better player and the salary space back to resign Sefolosha. Which would make it harder to find minutes for Roberson long term anyway.

sully00 wrote:OKC can just amnesty Perkins if they want to they certainly aren't going to throw away good cheap young players to get rid of him.


They can't amnesty him. They'd have to pay him still. Had they been willing to go that route, wouldn't it have happened by now? They have Westbrook, Jackson and Lamb, plus Sefolosha who you can resign this way. Surely a 5th guard (Roberson) isn't so important as to preclude the double whammy of getting a better big man and cap space?


Is there a scenario where were we get Perry Jones III bc that would be awesome... Huge man crush on that guy.
Image
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,172
And1: 15,037
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1329 » by 165bows » Tue Jan 7, 2014 11:44 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/billsimmons/status/420656463959183360[/tweet]
KGboss
RealGM
Posts: 21,217
And1: 10,097
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
Location: Boston Garden
       

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1330 » by KGboss » Tue Jan 7, 2014 11:51 pm

based on what Mr. Simmons?
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1331 » by CelticFaninLBC » Wed Jan 8, 2014 12:44 am

Valid wrote:I highly doubt OKC is going to have a "we aren't winning anything" attitude, especially if they are also sending out Lamb whom are they very high on. There is a very good chance Lamb ends up being better than Afflalo.


Bottom line is that Afflalo gets OKC closer to a title than Jackson.
greenpierce
Pro Prospect
Posts: 843
And1: 148
Joined: May 02, 2001
Location: Los Angeles
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1332 » by greenpierce » Wed Jan 8, 2014 12:46 am

I'm selling on Jeff Green. As a dream trade, if they could send him and Bass out to Charlotte for Gordon (expiring) and Kidd-Gilchrist I'd be a happy guy.
Then Gordon, Bayless, Humphries, Crawford, Brooks, and Bogans will all clear the books this summer. You'd use the stretch provision on Wallace and cut him. All that'd be left would be Rondo, Kidd-Gilchrist, Sullinger, Faverani, and Olynyk. Bradley is a RFA. Ainge takes the two 1st rounders, and all that wonderful cash and makes the best team possible.
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1333 » by KJandHondo35 » Wed Jan 8, 2014 12:46 am

CelticFaninLBC wrote:
Valid wrote:I highly doubt OKC is going to have a "we aren't winning anything" attitude, especially if they are also sending out Lamb whom are they very high on. There is a very good chance Lamb ends up being better than Afflalo.


Bottom line is that Afflalo gets OKC closer to a title than Jackson.


Yeah I think OKC would have to go after Afflalo is there was any possibility of getting him... What 1-4 is better than Westbrook-Afflalo- Durant- Ibaka? None and makes them easy title contenders the next 3 years.
Image
User avatar
shawn unkempt
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,359
And1: 4,999
Joined: Dec 09, 2012
 

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1334 » by shawn unkempt » Wed Jan 8, 2014 12:47 am

165bows wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/billsimmons/status/420656463959183360[/tweet]

All this talk about Hayward is silly. He's basically a worse version of Jeff Green that wants more money.
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1335 » by KJandHondo35 » Wed Jan 8, 2014 12:50 am

shawn unkempt wrote:
165bows wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/billsimmons/status/420656463959183360[/tweet]

All this talk about Hayward is silly. He's basically a worse version of Jeff Green that wants more money.


Thank you! So bad, I don't know why anyone rooting for Celtics success is wanting him to be on this team. He's not good and doesn't even have defense to rest on making up for his horrendous offensive %s.
Image
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1336 » by CelticFaninLBC » Wed Jan 8, 2014 12:59 am

KJandHondo35 wrote:
shawn unkempt wrote:
165bows wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/billsimmons/status/420656463959183360[/tweet]

All this talk about Hayward is silly. He's basically a worse version of Jeff Green that wants more money.


Thank you! So bad, I don't know why anyone rooting for Celtics success is wanting him to be on this team. He's not good and doesn't even have defense to rest on making up for his horrendous offensive %s.


Seems Hayward's shooting went downhill after Utah gutted their team last summer. He was a 5 win shares player the past 2 years. He has heated up lately though.
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1337 » by KJandHondo35 » Wed Jan 8, 2014 1:02 am

CelticFaninLBC wrote:
KJandHondo35 wrote:
shawn unkempt wrote:All this talk about Hayward is silly. He's basically a worse version of Jeff Green that wants more money.


Thank you! So bad, I don't know why anyone rooting for Celtics success is wanting him to be on this team. He's not good and doesn't even have defense to rest on making up for his horrendous offensive %s.


Seems Hayward's shooting went downhill after Utah gutted their teams last summer. He was a 5 win shares player the past 2 years. He has heated up lately.

Since they got a ROY caliber PG his %s has gone down compared to when he was the primary ball handler and SG/scorer... Those last 24 games Trey Burke has played Hayward has shot 38% FG and 28% from 3?
Image
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1338 » by CelticFaninLBC » Wed Jan 8, 2014 1:06 am

KJandHondo35 wrote:
CelticFaninLBC wrote:
KJandHondo35 wrote:
Thank you! So bad, I don't know why anyone rooting for Celtics success is wanting him to be on this team. He's not good and doesn't even have defense to rest on making up for his horrendous offensive %s.


Seems Hayward's shooting went downhill after Utah gutted their teams last summer. He was a 5 win shares player the past 2 years. He has heated up lately.

Since they got a ROY caliber PG his %s has gone down compared to when he was the primary ball handler and SG/scorer... Those last 24 games Trey Burke has played Hayward has shot 38% FG and 28% from 3?


I was looking @ his last 7 games... Hayward was a 40% 3 point shooter prior to this year fwiw...
24istheLAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,798
And1: 5,031
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1339 » by 24istheLAW » Wed Jan 8, 2014 1:09 am

Hayward and Green are very different players.

Hayward:
AST% - 23.4
TOV% - 13.6
TRB% - 8.3

Green
AST% - 7.8
TOV% - 11.8
TRB% - 7.7

Hayward is a playmaker and has a very high BBIQ. Green's BBIQ is nonexistent as we all know. On the other hand, Green defends small forwards at a great level, while Hayward isn't much of a defender once you get past steals and blocks (he blocks more shots than Green).

The real concern with Hayward is that he's shooting .309 from 3-pt range this year. He shot .400 in his first three years so there's cause for optimism. But unless he's going to that %age back up, investing in him to be an offense-first wing is a non starter.
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1340 » by KJandHondo35 » Wed Jan 8, 2014 1:13 am

CelticFaninLBC wrote:
KJandHondo35 wrote:
CelticFaninLBC wrote:
Seems Hayward's shooting went downhill after Utah gutted their teams last summer. He was a 5 win shares player the past 2 years. He has heated up lately.

Since they got a ROY caliber PG his %s has gone down compared to when he was the primary ball handler and SG/scorer... Those last 24 games Trey Burke has played Hayward has shot 38% FG and 28% from 3?


I was looking @ his last 7 games... Hayward was a 40% 3 point shooter prior to this year fwiw...

Well if he can somehow resurrect his abysmal shooting numbers that will be one thing, but as of right now he is one of the least efficient guards in the NBA. He also plays close to no defense so he has to do A LOT to show me he's even close to the level of Avery who is a guy i think they need to improve on. From every statistical standpoint Hayward is worse than everyone currently on the Cs roster which isn't so good... The idea of overpaying him to steal him from Utah makes me nauseous.
Image

Return to Boston Celtics