ImageImageImage

The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0)

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, canman1971

User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1341 » by Captain_Caveman » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:36 am

DarkAzcura wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:OK, but watch the Warriors play sometime.

IT not a top 3 player on that team. They have 4 of the 5 best players on either roster, and our centers are the only players who would start for them.


Not that I ever thought this was a relevant discussion point but IT is playing better right now than Klay and Draymond ever have. I think even you would begrudgingly agree to that eventually since I know you think those two are a bit overrated. =p

Man Durant just messed everything up. :(

That's why I'm on the same page as you with holding onto those picks. Please keep the picks barring a miracle where we can get both George and Butler without losing IT and Horford.


To clarify, I am saying Curry, KD, Dray > IT but not Klay. Klay still better than any other Celtic besides IT. Only Horford and maybe Olynyk or Amir would start at the 5 for them. None of our players are even close to starting for them at guard or forward.

You can debate Dray > IT, but he is a complete player who is better at playmaking, rebounding and defending. Either way, just illustrating how much more talented they are. Not saying we couldn't give them a run with a big trade or two, but others are framing this as a matter of a Butler team putting us on a "title run", and that's kinda/probably/definitely not true.

IMO, we most likely have a better shot at a future championship if we just stay patient than we do by going all-in trying to beat a historically elite team with multiple MVPs, three of the best shooters ever and a leading DPOY candidate, plus a top 6th man and an elite coach.
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,597
And1: 8,077
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1342 » by Celtics_Champs » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:40 am

Crossy2008 wrote:It's clearly happening...

Read on Twitter



twitter going bonkers over this but he's done this before. Tease. no?
User avatar
Bar Fight
RealGM
Posts: 12,955
And1: 17,282
Joined: Sep 30, 2013
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1343 » by Bar Fight » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:42 am

Crossy2008 wrote:It's clearly happening...

Read on Twitter

I **** hope not.
Crossy2008
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,772
And1: 1,163
Joined: Dec 21, 2008
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1344 » by Crossy2008 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:43 am

Bar Fight wrote:
Crossy2008 wrote:It's clearly happening...

Read on Twitter

I **** hope not.


Last time Isaiah did this we signed Horford.
Smog
Senior
Posts: 706
And1: 801
Joined: Aug 19, 2010

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1345 » by Smog » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:43 am

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Green89 wrote:
Thomas is 28 and is absolutely in his prime. Horford is a bit past it and not getting any younger. These players were key acquisitions and are here, right now, playing at a high level. The problem in waiting is if you wait too long, these two will no longer be a factor, and then if your picks end up being all star level or in IT's case, and MVP contending level, who is going to compliment them?? You'd be right back where you started with IT and Horford, trying to get more people to pair with them to contend.

We have an incredible starting point right now to build a superb team, with IT the MVP candidate, and Horford the all star level big. You have to use the picks to get the pieces to combine with them to form a championship team. You need 3-4 great pieces to get a ring these days, and we don't even have 3. So even if both the BKN 17 and the BKN 18 turn into two key pieces toward a championship run, you then are no longer having the IT and Horford pieces, and the cycle starts over again. We are assuredly in possession of key pieces right now. You need to then turn your "possibilities" (aka the draft picks) into sure things to pair with them. That's the other thing, there is a chance that one or both picks don't turn out, then you've waiting things out, lost IT as he's past his prime, and Horford retires, and then you don't even have 1 of these 3-4 pieces that can get you a title. You're then in an even worse a position than you are now.

We have partial pieces now and turning the picks into the other pieces is a GUARANTEE that you would then end up with the 4 pieces you need to win it all. Whether you can then take those pieces and turn them into a ring is still up in the air and up to the players and coaches to get it done, but you then know exactly what your pieces are, and what they can do to your winning chances. You have no idea what the picks will ever do for your championship chances.

The bottom line is, if you trade the picks for key players/pieces to help aid a title run, you 100% have obtained the pieces needed for that. If you hold onto them and don't cash them in, you will have to try and pick the best potential, hope they develop, and even then it is a very low percentage that these will turn out to be the absolute pieces we need. We have all pieces now between who is on our roster and who the picks could turn into. We need to use them now. These pieces may never assemble like this again if you play the waiting and hoping game. THIS is why you trade the BKN picks.


OK, but watch the Warriors play sometime.

IT not a top 3 player on that team. They have 4 of the 5 best players on either roster, and our centers are the only players who would start for them.


I think this is what people need to come back to, myself included my visions of acquiring both George and Butler.

Golden State is an all-time team. Two top 25 players of all time. 3 top 10 shooters of all time. The most versatile defender on the game who can also playmake and shoot the 3. 4 of the top 20 players in the game. Best bet is to wait out the next three years while building for the future. Lucky for us, we will have 3 top 5 picks who we can groom in a winning environment. Smart, too, who is developing immensely by the game.

We need to stay the course. It sucks to admit we're not winning in the next three years. But if we make a panic trade we won't win in the next decade. It's a mistake we can't afford to make.


Agree with this. The reality of the Warriors (and Cavs, to a lesser degree) means the Cs only chance is to fully maximize all their assets. That means they can't be turning Jaylen Brown and a top-4 pick into one 28 year-old who might not even start on Golden State. They need Brown and that pick to pan out, along with next year's pick, and Smart, and Zizic, and a FA this summer, and so on.

The only move that makes sense is to consolidate redundant assets or package a player theyre going to lose anyway, like Bradley, along with a pick. Otherwise, just keep adding and coaching people up. It'd be a huge mistake to make a panic move just because Thomas is improved. That's a reason to put more faith in internal development, not less.
User avatar
CeltsfanSinceBirth
RealGM
Posts: 23,818
And1: 34,893
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
     

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1346 » by CeltsfanSinceBirth » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:44 am

Celtics_Champs wrote:
Crossy2008 wrote:It's clearly happening...

Read on Twitter



twitter going bonkers over this but he's done this before. Tease. no?


IMO, I think he's just reacting to the report that suggested he was partially responsible for the Cs not trading for Cousins.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 69,098
And1: 71,364
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1347 » by Celts17Pride » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:46 am

CeltsfanSinceBirth wrote:
Celtics_Champs wrote:
Crossy2008 wrote:It's clearly happening...

Read on Twitter



twitter going bonkers over this but he's done this before. Tease. no?


IMO, I think he's just reacting to the report that suggested he was partially responsible for the Cs not trading for Cousins.

Again as someone mentioned IT did this just before Twitter announced the Horford signing. Just saying
User avatar
Bar Fight
RealGM
Posts: 12,955
And1: 17,282
Joined: Sep 30, 2013
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1348 » by Bar Fight » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:47 am

Crossy2008 wrote:
Bar Fight wrote:
Crossy2008 wrote:It's clearly happening...

Read on Twitter

I **** hope not.


Last time Isaiah did this we signed Horford.

So last time he did this we signed a role player to 30 million a year for 4 years, and this time we're about to give away our future to lose in 7 to Lebron for the next 3 years? In that case I'm hoping for as little social media activity from IT as possible going forward.
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,503
And1: 15,666
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1349 » by bucknersrevenge » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:53 am

DarkAzcura wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:SIAP, but latest Bulpett. Claims IT did not recommend Boogie, among other things.

http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/celtics/2017/02/bulpett_as_nba_trade_market_settles_celtics_still_seeking_major_talent


Pretty much what I thought. Cousins wearing Celtic green was completely dependent on IT's opinion, IMO. Been saying that for a year..anyway, yeah, if IT had good things to say about him, Cousins would have been worth the moon with that skill set, but he's not here. I'm officially on the Cousins is just straight up bad news bandwagon.

Will be interesting to see how NOP plays out, though. Even if he is crazy, that's the most talented front court the NBA has seen in almost two decades.

Captain_Caveman wrote:
Green89 wrote:
Thomas is 28 and is absolutely in his prime. Horford is a bit past it and not getting any younger. These players were key acquisitions and are here, right now, playing at a high level. The problem in waiting is if you wait too long, these two will no longer be a factor, and then if your picks end up being all star level or in IT's case, and MVP contending level, who is going to compliment them?? You'd be right back where you started with IT and Horford, trying to get more people to pair with them to contend.

We have an incredible starting point right now to build a superb team, with IT the MVP candidate, and Horford the all star level big. You have to use the picks to get the pieces to combine with them to form a championship team. You need 3-4 great pieces to get a ring these days, and we don't even have 3. So even if both the BKN 17 and the BKN 18 turn into two key pieces toward a championship run, you then are no longer having the IT and Horford pieces, and the cycle starts over again. We are assuredly in possession of key pieces right now. You need to then turn your "possibilities" (aka the draft picks) into sure things to pair with them. That's the other thing, there is a chance that one or both picks don't turn out, then you've waiting things out, lost IT as he's past his prime, and Horford retires, and then you don't even have 1 of these 3-4 pieces that can get you a title. You're then in an even worse a position than you are now.

We have partial pieces now and turning the picks into the other pieces is a GUARANTEE that you would then end up with the 4 pieces you need to win it all. Whether you can then take those pieces and turn them into a ring is still up in the air and up to the players and coaches to get it done, but you then know exactly what your pieces are, and what they can do to your winning chances. You have no idea what the picks will ever do for your championship chances.

The bottom line is, if you trade the picks for key players/pieces to help aid a title run, you 100% have obtained the pieces needed for that. If you hold onto them and don't cash them in, you will have to try and pick the best potential, hope they develop, and even then it is a very low percentage that these will turn out to be the absolute pieces we need. We have all pieces now between who is on our roster and who the picks could turn into. We need to use them now. These pieces may never assemble like this again if you play the waiting and hoping game. THIS is why you trade the BKN picks.


OK, but watch the Warriors play sometime.

IT not a top 3 player on that team. They have 4 of the 5 best players on either roster, and our centers are the only players who would start for them.


Not that I ever thought this was a relevant discussion point but IT is playing better right now than Klay and Draymond ever have. I think even you would begrudgingly agree to that eventually since I know you think those two are a bit overrated. =p

Man Durant just messed everything up. :(

That's why I'm on the same page as you with holding onto those picks. Please keep the picks barring a miracle where we can get both George and Butler without losing IT and Horford.


Not that I would ever put words in Caveman's mouth but I suspect he will STILL disagree with you DA. As amazing as IT's 4th quarter and overall scoring exploits have been, he is nothing short of abysmal at the other end. And that's not his fault that he's 5'9. He doesn't quit for the most part. But he sticks like Velcro to picks and players shoot over him like he's not there. That's just how it is. Klay is the 2nd best shooter in the game right now and he plays solid defense. Without a doubt, the best at his position currently overall. Draymond, is ALL-World defensively. He's a bigger Marcus Smart with a better shot. Without a doubt, on another team he would be averaging 20 ppg to go with this defense instead, he's just the glue guy. I honestly thought/hoped that GSW would suffer on defense without Bogut back there. Instead, their defense is even better than it was last year and some of that is Durant but it's mostly him.
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
User avatar
CeltsfanSinceBirth
RealGM
Posts: 23,818
And1: 34,893
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
     

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1350 » by CeltsfanSinceBirth » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:53 am

Celts17Pride wrote:
CeltsfanSinceBirth wrote:
Celtics_Champs wrote:

twitter going bonkers over this but he's done this before. Tease. no?


IMO, I think he's just reacting to the report that suggested he was partially responsible for the Cs not trading for Cousins.

Again as someone mentioned IT did this just before Twitter announced the Horford signing. Just saying


I guess we'll find out in the next 24 hours.
Crossy2008
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,772
And1: 1,163
Joined: Dec 21, 2008
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1351 » by Crossy2008 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:53 am

Anyone got a really good player that the Celtics could add who nobody has considered.
bbd24
Starter
Posts: 2,178
And1: 954
Joined: Feb 03, 2005

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1352 » by bbd24 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:54 am

Bar Fight wrote:
Crossy2008 wrote:
Bar Fight wrote:I **** hope not.


Last time Isaiah did this we signed Horford.

So last time he did this we signed a role player to 30 million a year for 4 years, and this time we're about to give away our future to lose in 7 to Lebron for the next 3 years? In that case I'm hoping for as little social media activity from IT as possible going forward.


I think you're lost. You accidentally clicked the Celtics forum. The Knicks forum is a couple clicks below.
User avatar
VeryMuchWoke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,989
And1: 8,117
Joined: Dec 18, 2011
Location: All Around
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1353 » by VeryMuchWoke » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:54 am

CrowderKeg wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
CrowderKeg wrote:Apparently, there was never an offer. No trade talks.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/celtics/2017/02/20/celtics-were-never-interested-demarcus-cousins/7Cgggokz7CPKgfjN2CakWM/story.html

Depends on which source you choose to believe. Bontemps I don't think is plugged into the organization more than Himmelsbach.


Bontemps said that meaning the Celtics weren't interested even in trading a low level prospect for Cousins. They're functionally saying the same thing.

I have to listen to the pod again but the way he said it, it seemed that talks occurred and that Rozier was involved. Another Lakers reporter said we tried to swoop in late.


I think we pulled Rozier from a potential Okafor deal, and Bontemps confused the two because 1) he's a moron and 2) the Pels offered the same package for Cousins as they did for Okafor.
"Danny Ainge needs to shut the **** up and manage his own team. He was the biggest whiner when he was playing, and I know that because I coached against him."
Pat Riley
ajones9219
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,232
And1: 6,004
Joined: Apr 15, 2015
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1354 » by ajones9219 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:54 am

Bar Fight wrote:
Crossy2008 wrote:
Bar Fight wrote:I **** hope not.


Last time Isaiah did this we signed Horford.

So last time he did this we signed a role player to 30 million a year for 4 years, and this time we're about to give away our future to lose in 7 to Lebron for the next 3 years? In that case I'm hoping for as little social media activity from IT as possible going forward.

If you consider Horford a role player then I don't know what to reasonably tell you
bbd24
Starter
Posts: 2,178
And1: 954
Joined: Feb 03, 2005

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1355 » by bbd24 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:54 am

Crossy2008 wrote:Anyone got a really good player that the Celtics could add who nobody has considered.


DeAndre Jordan.
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,224
And1: 10,636
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1356 » by chrisab123 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:58 am

Bar Fight wrote:
Crossy2008 wrote:
Bar Fight wrote:I **** hope not.


Last time Isaiah did this we signed Horford.

So last time he did this we signed a role player to 30 million a year for 4 years, and this time we're about to give away our future to lose in 7 to Lebron for the next 3 years? In that case I'm hoping for as little social media activity from IT as possible going forward.


If you think Horford is a role player then you clearly had a different opinion of what Al Horford was bringing to Boston.
ajones9219
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,232
And1: 6,004
Joined: Apr 15, 2015
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1357 » by ajones9219 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:59 am

Crossy2008 wrote:It's clearly happening...

Read on Twitter


Lol Isaiah is Ainge's current mouthpiece I think
User avatar
prov1ml
Starter
Posts: 2,064
And1: 2,157
Joined: Jun 25, 2014
     

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1358 » by prov1ml » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:59 am

Well, there goes my night (as if I wasn't going to be glued to this thread and twitter anyway)!

For the love of God, IT, please don't be trollin'.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 69,098
And1: 71,364
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1359 » by Celts17Pride » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:01 am

Crossy2008 wrote:Anyone got a really good player that the Celtics could add who nobody has considered.

My guess is not Butler but Paul George
fallguy
General Manager
Posts: 7,863
And1: 12,722
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1360 » by fallguy » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:01 am

Crossy2008 wrote:
Bar Fight wrote:
Crossy2008 wrote:It's clearly happening...

Read on Twitter

I **** hope not.


Last time Isaiah did this we signed Horford.


IT'S TYSON CHANDLER TIME

Return to Boston Celtics