ImageImageImage

Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

mwhis21
Analyst
Posts: 3,528
And1: 1,065
Joined: Jun 16, 2004
Location: Boston
Contact:
       

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1361 » by mwhis21 » Wed Jan 8, 2014 3:15 pm

IMO, if the Jazz land a top 3 pick I think they're going to let Hayward walk or do a sign and trade. It just doesn't make sense to overpay for production that's going to get close to replicated across the board at much lower cost.

Humor me for a minute…

Kanter/Favors/Burke are the foundation here. You're adding one of Parker/Wiggins hypothetically.

Trey Burke (3m)
Alex Burks (2.5m)
Parker/Wiggins (4-5m)
Favors (12m)
Kanter (8-10m) Factoring in an extension at some point.

Their starting lineup will cost them 30 million (give or take) and it's a pretty good starting lineup….that leaves them with a ridiculous amount of cap space…IMO I think that Avery Bradley would be a better sign than resigning Hayward. Let's assume they sign Bradley for 4 years 36 million.

Trey Burke
Avery Bradley
Parker/Wiggins
Favors
Kanter

Still with close to or actual max cap space. I'm actually kind of jealous of the Utah Jazz right now…My point is I'm not sure Hayward is going to get 8 figures. I'm also not convinced that the Jazz will just match and offer sheet at 8-9 million per year.

Thoughts?
User avatar
15th overall
RealGM
Posts: 11,482
And1: 5,853
Joined: Mar 02, 2005
Location: ball of confusion
 

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1362 » by 15th overall » Wed Jan 8, 2014 3:20 pm

BleedGreen1989 wrote:^^^Yeah it is an idea. I don't think anybody was saying it was an actual rumor but Simmons had a "hunch".

I doubt the Brad Stevens/Gordon Hayward connection will ever really go away.

Yea, for whatever reason I thought it was an educated guess of sorts, based on rumblings he had been hearing or whatever.. but he's just hanging his hat on that Butler connection like everybody else does. I don't even want Hayward at over $9 mil a season but I was kind of disappointed by this.
Image
"[Brad Stevens] was just cool. He's always, always super cool." -- Stanley Johnson
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1363 » by CelticFaninLBC » Wed Jan 8, 2014 3:22 pm

Deal Bradley & Olynyk for Hayward...

Bradley's cheaper and will help with Utah's tank. Iirc Utah had lots of interest in Olynyk pre-draft...
LobCityRondo2KG
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,093
And1: 2,070
Joined: Mar 18, 2012
         

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1364 » by LobCityRondo2KG » Wed Jan 8, 2014 3:45 pm

mwhis21 wrote:IMO, if the Jazz land a top 3 pick I think they're going to let Hayward walk or do a sign and trade. It just doesn't make sense to overpay for production that's going to get close to replicated across the board at much lower cost.

Humor me for a minute…

Kanter/Favors/Burke are the foundation here. You're adding one of Parker/Wiggins hypothetically.

Trey Burke (3m)
Alex Burks (2.5m)
Parker/Wiggins (4-5m)
Favors (12m)
Kanter (8-10m) Factoring in an extension at some point.

Their starting lineup will cost them 30 million (give or take) and it's a pretty good starting lineup….that leaves them with a ridiculous amount of cap space…IMO I think that Avery Bradley would be a better sign than resigning Hayward. Let's assume they sign Bradley for 4 years 36 million.

Trey Burke
Avery Bradley
Parker/Wiggins
Favors
Kanter

Still with close to or actual max cap space. I'm actually kind of jealous of the Utah Jazz right now…My point is I'm not sure Hayward is going to get 8 figures. I'm also not convinced that the Jazz will just match and offer sheet at 8-9 million per year.

Thoughts?


They could just shift Hayward over to the 2 Guard
Florida celtic
Freshman
Posts: 75
And1: 12
Joined: Dec 03, 2013

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1365 » by Florida celtic » Wed Jan 8, 2014 4:35 pm

What would it take to get Rockets DMo?

A 2020 2nd rounder?
User avatar
15th overall
RealGM
Posts: 11,482
And1: 5,853
Joined: Mar 02, 2005
Location: ball of confusion
 

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1366 » by 15th overall » Wed Jan 8, 2014 4:42 pm

Florida celtic wrote:What would it take to get Rockets DMo?

A 2020 2nd rounder?

Morey seems to overrate his own players. I don't think it's safe to assume anything when trying to gauge what he would consider to be fair value.
Image
"[Brad Stevens] was just cool. He's always, always super cool." -- Stanley Johnson
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1367 » by Valid » Wed Jan 8, 2014 5:22 pm

CelticFaninLBC wrote:Deal Bradley & Olynyk for Hayward...

Bradley's cheaper and will help with Utah's tank. Iirc Utah had lots of interest in Olynyk pre-draft...

That's too much to give up for Hayward.
Florida celtic
Freshman
Posts: 75
And1: 12
Joined: Dec 03, 2013

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1368 » by Florida celtic » Wed Jan 8, 2014 5:52 pm

If Rockets want a scoring wing:

DMO for Marshon Brooks works
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1369 » by Valid » Wed Jan 8, 2014 6:00 pm

Florida celtic wrote:If Rockets want a scoring wing:

DMO for Marshon Brooks works

No GM would ever do that deal. Never mind Daryl Morey, who would probably ask us for Jared Sullinger and pick in return for Motiejunas.
Florida celtic
Freshman
Posts: 75
And1: 12
Joined: Dec 03, 2013

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1370 » by Florida celtic » Wed Jan 8, 2014 7:01 pm

Valid wrote:
Florida celtic wrote:If Rockets want a scoring wing:

DMO for Marshon Brooks works

No GM would ever do that deal. Never mind Daryl Morey, who would probably ask us for Jared Sullinger and pick in return for Motiejunas.



Maybe Humphries for Asik and DMO?

If Houston doesn't trust TJones at the 4.

Can DMO play the 5?
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1371 » by Valid » Wed Jan 8, 2014 7:03 pm

Florida celtic wrote:
Valid wrote:
Florida celtic wrote:If Rockets want a scoring wing:

DMO for Marshon Brooks works

No GM would ever do that deal. Never mind Daryl Morey, who would probably ask us for Jared Sullinger and pick in return for Motiejunas.



Maybe Humphries for Asik and DMO?

If Houston doesn't trust TJones at the 4.

Can DMO play the 5?

Morey is asking for an arm and leg in return for Asik. Throw DMo into the deal, and you're probably looking at giving up an ear and an eye, too.

As far as Jones goes, they like him a lot. It's just a matter of them wanting to add another big who can stretch the floor. Humphries fits that bill, but he'd have to be part of a much larger package to land both Asik and Motiejunas. Plus, I think Morey would rather have Bass than Hump for defensive purposes.
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1372 » by CelticFaninLBC » Wed Jan 8, 2014 7:08 pm

Valid wrote:
Florida celtic wrote:
Valid wrote:No GM would ever do that deal. Never mind Daryl Morey, who would probably ask us for Jared Sullinger and pick in return for Motiejunas.



Maybe Humphries for Asik and DMO?

If Houston doesn't trust TJones at the 4.

Can DMO play the 5?

Morey is asking for an arm and leg in return for Asik. Throw DMo into the deal, and you're probably looking at giving up an ear and an eye, too.

As far as Jones goes, they like him a lot. It's just a matter of them wanting to add another big who can stretch the floor. Humphries fits that bill, but he'd have to be part of a much larger package to land both Asik and Motiejunas. Plus, I think Morey would rather have Bass than Hump for defensive purposes.


Morey seems to desire a big who can shoot the 3 like Hawes... They have nothing to give to Philly though...
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1373 » by Slartibartfast » Wed Jan 8, 2014 7:45 pm

In the aftermath of the Deng trade, I think Chicago will look to position themselves for a big free agency splash by amnestying Boozer and shedding some of the non Rose/Noah money. They may also be looking to improve their draft position.

So how about Hump and a lotto-protected pick for Taj Gibson and Mike Dunleavy? We get the rich man's Brandon Bass (fast enough to defend quick 4s but long enough to protect the rim) to slot in between Sully and KO in the big man rotation and a guy that shouldn't be hard to trade in Dunleavy.

It's not my dream scenario, but if the front office is optimistic about Sully and KO, Gibson's a great guy to fill out the rotation.
j_angel
Analyst
Posts: 3,132
And1: 366
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
Location: England

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1374 » by j_angel » Wed Jan 8, 2014 7:55 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:In the aftermath of the Deng trade, I think Chicago will look to position themselves for a big free agency splash by amnestying Boozer and shedding some of the non Rose/Noah money. They may also be looking to improve their draft position.

So how about Hump and a lotto-protected pick for Taj Gibson and Mike Dunleavy? We get the rich man's Brandon Bass (fast enough to defend quick 4s but long enough to protect the rim) to slot in between Sully and KO in the big man rotation and a guy that shouldn't be hard to trade in Dunleavy.

It's not my dream scenario, but if the front office is optimistic about Sully and KO, Gibson's a great guy to fill out the rotation.


I like Gibson but thats the exact opposite direction we need to go in. Gibson is a bench player at best behind Sully. He is undersized so we mays as well play Humphries. + He is 28.

Acquiring Noah I could see because he is a defensive guy who is big enough to play the 5.
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1375 » by CelticFaninLBC » Wed Jan 8, 2014 8:10 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:In the aftermath of the Deng trade, I think Chicago will look to position themselves for a big free agency splash by amnestying Boozer and shedding some of the non Rose/Noah money. They may also be looking to improve their draft position.

So how about Hump and a lotto-protected pick for Taj Gibson and Mike Dunleavy? We get the rich man's Brandon Bass (fast enough to defend quick 4s but long enough to protect the rim) to slot in between Sully and KO in the big man rotation and a guy that shouldn't be hard to trade in Dunleavy.

It's not my dream scenario, but if the front office is optimistic about Sully and KO, Gibson's a great guy to fill out the rotation.


That's a lot of money to pay Sully's backup @ the 4...

If Chicago was offering Deng 3 & 30, I can't see them going all out in free agency for someone like Melo, who seems out of their price range... I suspect they're trying to tank the season and will be dumping Hinrich & Dunleavy soon.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1376 » by Slartibartfast » Wed Jan 8, 2014 8:19 pm

CelticFaninLBC wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:In the aftermath of the Deng trade, I think Chicago will look to position themselves for a big free agency splash by amnestying Boozer and shedding some of the non Rose/Noah money. They may also be looking to improve their draft position.

So how about Hump and a lotto-protected pick for Taj Gibson and Mike Dunleavy? We get the rich man's Brandon Bass (fast enough to defend quick 4s but long enough to protect the rim) to slot in between Sully and KO in the big man rotation and a guy that shouldn't be hard to trade in Dunleavy.

It's not my dream scenario, but if the front office is optimistic about Sully and KO, Gibson's a great guy to fill out the rotation.


That's a lot of money to pay Sully's backup @ the 4...

If Chicago was offering Deng 3 & 30, I can't see them going all out in free agency for someone like Melo, who seems out of their price range... I suspect they're trying to tank the season and will be dumping Hinrich & Dunleavy soon.


More of a 6th man than a back-up.

Big difference between Deng and Melo. Melo is a lot more like Rose, the guy they are paying $18+ mil per.
rickrolled
Head Coach
Posts: 6,453
And1: 2,652
Joined: Nov 12, 2011

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1377 » by rickrolled » Wed Jan 8, 2014 8:24 pm

NBA trade rumors - Bobcats shopping Ben Gordon.

- The Charlotte Bobcats are shopping Ben Gordon, according to league sources. They have talked to many teams about the veteran guard and are trying to move Gordon's $13,200,000 ending contract for a player who helps them win now. Charlotte has played well this season and currently sits in the East's seventh seed. They're expected to be buyers at the deadline, because they want to make the playoffs for just the second time in franchise history.

http://sulia.com/channel/detroit-piston ... ce=twitter



Looks like they're serious about making the playoffs, MKG will be back soon and they need a vet or two, maybe Bass,Crawford,Bogans for Gordon,Taylor and DET pick ?

Eventhough they liked Hump and may still do, Bass and Crawford is tough to pass up. Crawford is better than Taylor who is out for the season. Good trade for both teams.
User avatar
klemen4
Head Coach
Posts: 7,327
And1: 1,927
Joined: Feb 27, 2005

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1378 » by klemen4 » Wed Jan 8, 2014 8:31 pm

There are a lot of options trading with Charlotte, we have to use this chance.

They basically needs improvement at every position, Green and Bass could also start there, Hump would be perfect 3rd big, Crawford perfect 6th man....

Hump for Gordon, POR pick
Bass+Crawford for Gordon, DET pick(let them protect it)
Green+Bass for Gordon, MKG

I would even offer Green,Bass, Crawford for MKG...would be perfect tanking move and young starters for us.

Rondo/Bradley/MKG/Olynyk/Sully
“The only important statistic is the final score.” — Bill Russell
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1379 » by CelticFaninLBC » Wed Jan 8, 2014 8:51 pm

klemen4 wrote:I would even offer Green,Bass, Crawford for MKG...

Rondo/Bradley/MKG/Olynyk/Sully


Would love that trade, and even better if they can replace Bradley, with Hayward, as both MKG and Bradley are offensively challenged..
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1380 » by CelticFaninLBC » Wed Jan 8, 2014 8:59 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:
That's a lot of money to pay Sully's backup @ the 4...

If Chicago was offering Deng 3 & 30, I can't see them going all out in free agency for someone like Melo, who seems out of their price range... I suspect they're trying to tank the season and will be dumping Hinrich & Dunleavy soon.


More of a 6th man than a back-up.

Big difference between Deng and Melo. Melo is a lot more like Rose, the guy they are paying $18+ mil per.[/quote]

Yes similar players. I'm not sure if there will be enough basketballs for Melo & Rose... Both dominate the ball.

Return to Boston Celtics