Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
rickrolled wrote:we don't get Dallas' pick if it's between 15-30.Captain_Caveman wrote:Currently slotted for the following picks: 4, 17, 20, 31, 40, 47, 55, 58.
A Nets run away from a worst case scenario, IMO.
Smitty731 wrote:I took a look today and it is waaaaaay too early for this, but as of now the Celtics would have:
Pick 3 (Brooklyn)
Pick 14 (own)
Pick 31 (Philadelphia)
Pick 39 (Minnesota)
Pick 48 (Dallas through Memphis)
Pick 57 (Cleveland)
Pick 58 (Miami)
No way any team needs 5 second picks. I'd start packaging stuff together with players and try to get better, established players or better picks.
Captain_Caveman wrote:Smitty731 wrote:I took a look today and it is waaaaaay too early for this, but as of now the Celtics would have:
Pick 3 (Brooklyn)
Pick 14 (own)
Pick 31 (Philadelphia)
Pick 39 (Minnesota)
Pick 48 (Dallas through Memphis)
Pick 57 (Cleveland)
Pick 58 (Miami)
No way any team needs 5 second picks. I'd start packaging stuff together with players and try to get better, established players or better picks.
Not to nitpick, but not quite accurate. Left out the Mavs pick, and the Nets are currently 4th worst in winning percentage. There is also a 6-way tie for 15th worst, with both the Celts and Mavs picks in that range.
No question we need to consolidate picks, but the problem is that other teams know that.
jmr07019 wrote:We can let go of Lee, Zeller and Turner to open up space for our Brooklyn pick, our pick and the Mavs pick. If we really need another roster spot we can cut Young and eat the cap hit.
Of course trading up is preferred. Mavs pick, Boston pick, 2nds and one of Young or Rozier will hopefully get us to the top 10.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose
Fruit Pastilles wrote:Warriors off to a hot start away vs. Nets.
20 - 8
skywalker33 wrote:jmr07019 wrote:We can let go of Lee, Zeller and Turner to open up space for our Brooklyn pick, our pick and the Mavs pick. If we really need another roster spot we can cut Young and eat the cap hit.
Of course trading up is preferred. Mavs pick, Boston pick, 2nds and one of Young or Rozier will hopefully get us to the top 10.
Couldn't do it last year with all 4 being 1sts.... what makes you think you'll do it with a lesser offer ?? just sayin'
Definitely seeing DA being able to move some of those 2nds though, probably can turn PHI + for a late 1st if you want.
truth18 wrote:Brooklyn giving the Dubs some trouble.
jmr07019 wrote:skywalker33 wrote:jmr07019 wrote:We can let go of Lee, Zeller and Turner to open up space for our Brooklyn pick, our pick and the Mavs pick. If we really need another roster spot we can cut Young and eat the cap hit.
Of course trading up is preferred. Mavs pick, Boston pick, 2nds and one of Young or Rozier will hopefully get us to the top 10.
Couldn't do it last year with all 4 being 1sts.... what makes you think you'll do it with a lesser offer ?? just sayin'
Definitely seeing DA being able to move some of those 2nds though, probably can turn PHI + for a late 1st if you want.
Every year is a different set of circumstances. There's no guarantee we will be able to trade up that's why I said hopefully. There are examples of teams trading multiple picks for a higher one in the past. Something like 15, 17 and 31 for 9 or 10 seems realistic
165bows wrote:Dallas continues to be impressive unfortunately.
