Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Froob wrote:Fultz must be ****ing psyched. Doesn't get to start right away, but joins a team with great ownership, management, and coaching. And is already winning. Perfect scenario.
KGboss wrote:fallguy wrote:Conspiracy theorists - let's hear your twisted logic as to why the Celtics didn't get ****. And then never speak of this nonsense again.
Amazing night.
The conspiracy is the Lakers knew they were getting their pick this year.
165bows wrote:Smitty731 wrote:It's a magical year fellas. All the unexpected has happened in sports this year.
Just like to say you broke the news for me cold turkey on Twitter.
Nothing every five minutes for 45 mins then Smitty says "We won!"
Smitty731 wrote:165bows wrote:Smitty731 wrote:It's a magical year fellas. All the unexpected has happened in sports this year.
Just like to say you broke the news for me cold turkey on Twitter.
Nothing every five minutes for 45 mins then Smitty says "We won!"
That just means you don't follow enough people!
Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.
esad247 wrote:Okay so I need some kind of reassurances on Fultz, I don't watch college BB any more so I have no clue really. I watched some highlights and I just watched an interview with him and I got a strange feeling like he's not the guy, not sure why, just a weird gut feeling. Can he get to the hoop as easy against NBA teams? Also, there was mention of injuries in College? I just wonder if this guy is really the real deal, take over a franchise type guy. Like does he have that IT factor?
jmr07019 wrote:Froob wrote:Fultz must be ****ing psyched. Doesn't get to start right away, but joins a team with great ownership, management, and coaching. And is already winning. Perfect scenario.
IT and AB are from washington like Fultz (and Crawford and some others) and apparently they all stick together. So there's that
gammajamma wrote:jmr07019 wrote:Froob wrote:Fultz must be ****ing psyched. Doesn't get to start right away, but joins a team with great ownership, management, and coaching. And is already winning. Perfect scenario.
IT and AB are from washington like Fultz (and Crawford and some others) and apparently they all stick together. So there's that
I thought Fultz was from DC?
ParticleMan wrote:fake #1 pick.
Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.
sarcasma wrote:Basically all our guards will be on notice once the CAVS series starts. Smart, IT, Rozier, Bradley, all are on the hot seat now.
Celts17Pride wrote:Interesting trade to at least think about in my opinion.
Deal centered around #1 and Bradley to Phoenix for Booker and #4 then sign Hayward.
If the Celtics trade the #1 pick it has to be for someone young and upcoming in my opinion. Not 28-31 years old.
Just having a little fun.
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:the only way I get excited about trading this pick if it is AD, barring that, **** it draft the kid.
Krkrich wrote:I wish there was an amazing big that we could draft at #1 to make this easy. So let's say we draft Fultz, what the hell happens to the guard rotation? I cant see IT not being a piece of this team's future after the season he had. Let's think about jersey and ticket sales. Ainge isn't going to trade him. So thinking long term, is Bradley getting traded? How is Fultz on defense? ****, this is so confusing lol
