ImageImageImage

Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,422
And1: 23,552
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1401 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Thu Jan 9, 2014 1:30 am

GreenMachine wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:Cap space and a first rounder for Kirk Hinrich? That's a great deal. That's like saying we would laugh if anybody offered us an expiring and a first for Bass.


A top 12 protected pick for Kirk AND Dunleavy? Because they can get a late first rounder for each of those guys AT WORSE.


Mike Dunleavy is worth a first round draft pick? You would give a first for that guy?
WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎ THANK YOU TRUTH!
User avatar
DK-All Day
General Manager
Posts: 9,746
And1: 8,458
Joined: Oct 12, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1402 » by DK-All Day » Thu Jan 9, 2014 2:13 am

When you need a laugh....go to the Knick board:
GoodAzzGame_NYK wrote:
bkknicks19 wrote:
Juco24 wrote:Felton, Stoudemire, THJ & future 1st for Rondo, G Wallace, B Bass.
Would the Celtics do it? I mean this would allow them to shed Wallace salary a year earlier and Felton's contract isn't horrible.

Of course we'd be paying a steep price for the services of Rondo (THJ + future pick). But I would like our lineup;
Rondo, Shump, Chandler, Bass, Melo and a bench of Prigs, Wallace, Bargs, Kmart & JR (uuugghhh)
And still have Murry, Tyler, Udrih, MWP, Cole


Another interesting trade that i've seen floated many times on this board. Personally, i'd rather throw JR in there and keep THjr.. Also not sure that boston and NY would make the best possible trade in a straight up scenario. Really feel like a 3rd and maybe even a 4th team needs to be involved.
Handsome.
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,023
And1: 3,904
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1403 » by BleedGreen1989 » Thu Jan 9, 2014 2:25 pm

DK-All Day wrote:When you need a laugh....go to the Knick board:
GoodAzzGame_NYK wrote:
bkknicks19 wrote:
Another interesting trade that i've seen floated many times on this board. Personally, i'd rather throw JR in there and keep THjr.. Also not sure that boston and NY would make the best possible trade in a straight up scenario. Really feel like a 3rd and maybe even a 4th team needs to be involved.


"Really feel like a 3rd team or 4th team needs to be involved."

No Knick fan, people need to actually want the crap you have. Nobody does.
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,023
And1: 3,904
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1404 » by BleedGreen1989 » Thu Jan 9, 2014 2:27 pm

Regarding Bass, I think the best Danny can hope for is an expiring and a small sweetner (2nd rounder)

I would take that.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1405 » by sully00 » Thu Jan 9, 2014 5:36 pm

GreenMachine wrote:
CelticFaninLBC wrote:
GreenMachine wrote:
Actually... no, he's not. He is quite desirable as a 3rd big. DA has already turned down a late first for him. #fact


From what team?


Not sure. Source just said "late first".


What source?

There is what you hear, what you believe, and then there are facts they tend to be verifiable.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,167
And1: 15,028
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1406 » by 165bows » Thu Jan 9, 2014 6:08 pm

Alex Kennedy: The Charlotte Bobcats continue to shop Ben Gordon. Source says Charlotte has been shopping him for awhile, but hasn't found a deal yet. Twitter @AlexKennedyNBA

Alex Kennedy: League source identifies Charlotte, Houston, Phoenix as buyers as trade deadline approaches. They each want to add talent for playoff push. Twitter @AlexKennedyNBA


http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.qOeG9r02.dpuf
24istheLAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,798
And1: 5,031
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1407 » by 24istheLAW » Thu Jan 9, 2014 6:46 pm

165bows wrote:
Alex Kennedy: The Charlotte Bobcats continue to shop Ben Gordon. Source says Charlotte has been shopping him for awhile, but hasn't found a deal yet. Twitter @AlexKennedyNBA

Alex Kennedy: League source identifies Charlotte, Houston, Phoenix as buyers as trade deadline approaches. They each want to add talent for playoff push. Twitter @AlexKennedyNBA


http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.qOeG9r02.dpuf


Good link.

They clearly don't want expirings for expirings' sake (like Gordon), and they don't want inefficient scorers (like Crawford) when they have guys like Kemba and Henderson who can go one on one just as well or better. I don't think they're trading us Cody Zeller or Kidd-Gilchrist unless we offer something that would be dumb from our perspective (i.e. Rondo). I could see them being interested in Humphries or Green though.

Could we shake off Bismack Biyombo, and would you want him?

As for Houston we've exhausted the possibilities there. Phoenix? I don't see what they'd possibly want from us. Besides Bradley, and I don't see a fair trade looking at their roster.
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1408 » by Valid » Thu Jan 9, 2014 6:53 pm

24istheLAW wrote:
165bows wrote:
Alex Kennedy: The Charlotte Bobcats continue to shop Ben Gordon. Source says Charlotte has been shopping him for awhile, but hasn't found a deal yet. Twitter @AlexKennedyNBA

Alex Kennedy: League source identifies Charlotte, Houston, Phoenix as buyers as trade deadline approaches. They each want to add talent for playoff push. Twitter @AlexKennedyNBA


http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.qOeG9r02.dpuf


Good link.

They clearly don't want expirings for expirings' sake (like Gordon), and they don't want inefficient scorers (like Crawford) when they have guys like Kemba and Henderson who can go one on one just as well or better. I don't think they're trading us Cody Zeller or Kidd-Gilchrist unless we offer something that would be dumb from our perspective (i.e. Rondo). I could see them being interested in Humphries or Green though.

Could we shake off Bismack Biyombo, and would you want him?

As for Houston we've exhausted the possibilities there. Phoenix? I don't see what they'd possibly want from us. Besides Bradley, and I don't see a fair trade looking at their roster.

Not sure the Bobcats would give up Biyombo unless they're getting something really worthwhile in return. He has been a pretty huge reason for their surprisingly good defense this season, and he's only 21. Maybe they'd deal him if we trade them Green, but even then I'm not so sure. He's their only good frontcourt defender.
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1409 » by KJandHondo35 » Thu Jan 9, 2014 7:03 pm

24istheLAW wrote:
165bows wrote:
Alex Kennedy: The Charlotte Bobcats continue to shop Ben Gordon. Source says Charlotte has been shopping him for awhile, but hasn't found a deal yet. Twitter @AlexKennedyNBA

Alex Kennedy: League source identifies Charlotte, Houston, Phoenix as buyers as trade deadline approaches. They each want to add talent for playoff push. Twitter @AlexKennedyNBA


http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.qOeG9r02.dpuf


Good link.

They clearly don't want expirings for expirings' sake (like Gordon), and they don't want inefficient scorers (like Crawford) when they have guys like Kemba and Henderson who can go one on one just as well or better. I don't think they're trading us Cody Zeller or Kidd-Gilchrist unless we offer something that would be dumb from our perspective (i.e. Rondo). I could see them being interested in Humphries or Green though.

Could we shake off Bismack Biyombo, and would you want him?

As for Houston we've exhausted the possibilities there. Phoenix? I don't see what they'd possibly want from us. Besides Bradley, and I don't see a fair trade looking at their roster.


I mean Hump and Bradley for Okafor and Goodwin plus at least 1 of their 4 1st round picks i think would be good for both sides.
Image
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1410 » by Valid » Thu Jan 9, 2014 7:08 pm

KJandHondo35 wrote:
24istheLAW wrote:


Good link.

They clearly don't want expirings for expirings' sake (like Gordon), and they don't want inefficient scorers (like Crawford) when they have guys like Kemba and Henderson who can go one on one just as well or better. I don't think they're trading us Cody Zeller or Kidd-Gilchrist unless we offer something that would be dumb from our perspective (i.e. Rondo). I could see them being interested in Humphries or Green though.

Could we shake off Bismack Biyombo, and would you want him?

As for Houston we've exhausted the possibilities there. Phoenix? I don't see what they'd possibly want from us. Besides Bradley, and I don't see a fair trade looking at their roster.


I mean Hump and Bradley for Okafor and Goodwin plus at least 1 of their 4 1st round picks i think would be good for both sides.

You wanna trade Bradley for that?
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1411 » by KJandHondo35 » Thu Jan 9, 2014 7:19 pm

Valid wrote:
KJandHondo35 wrote:
24istheLAW wrote:
Good link.

They clearly don't want expirings for expirings' sake (like Gordon), and they don't want inefficient scorers (like Crawford) when they have guys like Kemba and Henderson who can go one on one just as well or better. I don't think they're trading us Cody Zeller or Kidd-Gilchrist unless we offer something that would be dumb from our perspective (i.e. Rondo). I could see them being interested in Humphries or Green though.

Could we shake off Bismack Biyombo, and would you want him?

As for Houston we've exhausted the possibilities there. Phoenix? I don't see what they'd possibly want from us. Besides Bradley, and I don't see a fair trade looking at their roster.


I mean Hump and Bradley for Okafor and Goodwin plus at least 1 of their 4 1st round picks i think would be good for both sides.

You wanna trade Bradley for that?

I wouldn’t be opposed considering 3 1sts give a chance to almost move anywhere on the board if there was a specific guy DA was targeting. Even if its their 21st pick and we used it, the guy there is gonna be pretty good (think Chris Walker perceived lotto pick and 2 best SF in the draft but slipped bc of academic ineligibility). And Goodwin hasn’t played but if anything is what Avery Bradley was coming out of college and happens to be 6’5” (elite defender, need to develop range, 19 years old). And if that’s not enough for Bradley in your mind the Suns could give up 2 picks and still have 2. 4 first rounder’s in this draft? Sign me up yesterday.
Image
24istheLAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,798
And1: 5,031
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1412 » by 24istheLAW » Thu Jan 9, 2014 7:24 pm

Valid wrote:You wanna trade Bradley for that?


To me Bradley is worth 8 mil a season. So no, I wouldn't.

AB just "fits" so perfectly as the 4th guy on a contending team. If you have a franchise point guard, he can play shooting guard and be a damn good defender there, in spite of his size. If you have a franchise/ball dominant shooting guard or wing, he can be a point guard like Chalmers who runs the point in name only, shoots and plays D.

I'm more comfortable making a long term financial commitment to Bradley than anyone else on the team expect a healthy Rondo.

And no Goodwin's no elite defender.
24istheLAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,798
And1: 5,031
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1413 » by 24istheLAW » Thu Jan 9, 2014 7:28 pm

KJandHondo35 wrote:I wouldn’t be opposed considering 3 1sts give a chance to almost move anywhere on the board if there was a specific guy DA was targeting. Even if its their 21st pick and we used it, the guy there is gonna be pretty good (think Chris Walker perceived lotto pick and 2 best SF in the draft but slipped bc of academic ineligibility). And Goodwin hasn’t played but if anything is what Avery Bradley was coming out of college and happens to be 6’5” (elite defender, need to develop range, 19 years old). And if that’s not enough for Bradley in your mind the Suns could give up 2 picks and still have 2. 4 first rounder’s in this draft? Sign me up yesterday.


I think you're overrating those college players and underrating AB.

Bradley didn't need to develop range. Out of HS he was one of the best shooters in the nation. Its part of why his shooting coming around wasn't a surprise. Goodwin actually can't shoot. And Goodwin is athletic but his defensive track record isn't nearly as good.

And Chris Walker? He's athletic, cool. Jeremy Evans is pretty big and athletic and can flush a basketball. Hasn't helped him.
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1414 » by Valid » Thu Jan 9, 2014 7:29 pm

KJandHondo35 wrote:
Valid wrote:
KJandHondo35 wrote:
I mean Hump and Bradley for Okafor and Goodwin plus at least 1 of their 4 1st round picks i think would be good for both sides.

You wanna trade Bradley for that?

I wouldn’t be opposed considering 3 1sts give a chance to almost move anywhere on the board if there was a specific guy DA was targeting. Even if its their 21st pick and we used it, the guy there is gonna be pretty good (think Chris Walker perceived lotto pick and 2 best SF in the draft but slipped bc of academic ineligibility). And Goodwin hasn’t played but if anything is what Avery Bradley was coming out of college and happens to be 6’5” (elite defender, need to develop range, 19 years old). And if that’s not enough for Bradley in your mind the Suns could give up 2 picks and still have 2. 4 first rounder’s in this draft? Sign me up yesterday.

I'm not trading a 23-year-old elite defender with a steadily improving offensive game for an expiring contract, Archie Goodwin and the 21st pick. If Bradley were 27 or 28, then maybe, but he isn't. He is an improving young piece that we should build around.

Also, I don't think the Suns would trade two first-round picks for Hump and Bradley, either.
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1415 » by KJandHondo35 » Thu Jan 9, 2014 7:37 pm

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r34DMqulMXY[/youtube]
Kid is pretty good at 18, if you could be patient and develop him I would be infavor... I just see Bradley rapidly approaching his ceiling and I cant see a problem with trading while his value is high. He takes way too many mid range shots and is a reason for his fairly low PER despite his high % percentage. Regardless I would also be okay with Crawford and Hump for Okafor and Goodwin and 1 1st. I think the Suns would be better served anyways to have a shooter like Crawford they can bring off the bench vs Bradley who is bascally the role Bledsoe fill except he can average 18-5-4.
Image
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1416 » by KJandHondo35 » Thu Jan 9, 2014 7:41 pm

24istheLAW wrote:
KJandHondo35 wrote:I wouldn’t be opposed considering 3 1sts give a chance to almost move anywhere on the board if there was a specific guy DA was targeting. Even if its their 21st pick and we used it, the guy there is gonna be pretty good (think Chris Walker perceived lotto pick and 2 best SF in the draft but slipped bc of academic ineligibility). And Goodwin hasn’t played but if anything is what Avery Bradley was coming out of college and happens to be 6’5” (elite defender, need to develop range, 19 years old). And if that’s not enough for Bradley in your mind the Suns could give up 2 picks and still have 2. 4 first rounder’s in this draft? Sign me up yesterday.


I think you're overrating those college players and underrating AB.

Bradley didn't need to develop range. Out of HS he was one of the best shooters in the nation. Its part of why his shooting coming around wasn't a surprise. Goodwin actually can't shoot. And Goodwin is athletic but his defensive track record isn't nearly as good.

And Chris Walker? He's athletic, cool. Jeremy Evans is pretty big and athletic and can flush a basketball. Hasn't helped him.

Read Chris Ford's analysis of Walker... his strength is shooting not just athletisim. He Also says if he got on the court he could rocket up to the top 10 in the draft in no time.
Image
24istheLAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,798
And1: 5,031
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1417 » by 24istheLAW » Thu Jan 9, 2014 7:43 pm

I don't see why Bradley is "rapidly approaching his ceiling", when his usage on this team right now is completely different from how he'd be used on a team that has talent.

He is shooting 40% from 3. That is way more "efficient" use than anything Archie Goodwin does. Yea Goodwin might finish better inside but you don't pay your PG/SG to finish inside you pay them to space the floor.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1418 » by Slartibartfast » Thu Jan 9, 2014 7:44 pm

24istheLAW wrote:
165bows wrote:
Alex Kennedy: The Charlotte Bobcats continue to shop Ben Gordon. Source says Charlotte has been shopping him for awhile, but hasn't found a deal yet. Twitter @AlexKennedyNBA

Alex Kennedy: League source identifies Charlotte, Houston, Phoenix as buyers as trade deadline approaches. They each want to add talent for playoff push. Twitter @AlexKennedyNBA


http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.qOeG9r02.dpuf


Good link.

They clearly don't want expirings for expirings' sake (like Gordon), and they don't want inefficient scorers (like Crawford) when they have guys like Kemba and Henderson who can go one on one just as well or better. I don't think they're trading us Cody Zeller or Kidd-Gilchrist unless we offer something that would be dumb from our perspective (i.e. Rondo). I could see them being interested in Humphries or Green though.

Could we shake off Bismack Biyombo, and would you want him?



Green would definitely be a big help to their playoff hopes - a nice 3rd option after Kemba and Al. A bit of a dilemma with benching MKG (or going small with Green at the 4), so I'm not sure they'd pay much of a price for him.

Gordon and Biz for Bass and Green? That would make us a free agency player, and Biyombo's a nice fit with our offensive-oriented frontcourt. A complete zero offensively and undersized at the 5, but competent on the boards and a shot blocker - maybe a Theo Ratliff?

Probably rather keep Green.

I think the 3-teamer proposed earlier with Chicago makes the most sense for Charlotte. Hinrich/Dunleavy/Bass would greatly solidify Charlotte's bench with legit veteran contributors in place of garbage like CDR and Tolliver. Boston sends out Bass/Bogans/Crawford, gets back Gordon and Chicago gets Crawford and Bogans.
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1419 » by ddb » Thu Jan 9, 2014 7:58 pm

there are a bunch of trades involving the Celtics that could work as the deadline approaches. Let's just throw some out there for fun. I'm not saying I would or wouldn't do these deals. Just ideas being thrown out there.

-Bradley and lesser of our 2014 picks to Utah for Hayward

-Bass to Portland for TRobinson and Earl Watson (expiring) could also be waived

-Green to Houston for Asik

-Bass/Brooks 1st to Houston for Asik

Of the Blockbuster variety

-Hump/Brooks/Sully/Green + 2 1st rounders to Minny for Love/Brewer/Martin

-Phil Pressey/Hump/Bogans for LeBron James
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1420 » by KJandHondo35 » Thu Jan 9, 2014 8:04 pm

24istheLAW wrote:I don't see why Bradley is "rapidly approaching his ceiling", when his usage on this team right now is completely different from how he'd be used on a team that has talent.

He is shooting 40% from 3. That is way more "efficient" use than anything Archie Goodwin does. Yea Goodwin might finish better inside but you don't pay your PG/SG to finish inside you pay them to space the floor.

He is making strides at 3 pt shooting but is also really bad at passing (%ast is 7.3 putting him 95th overall for guards). And I'm never goning to be okay with how many shots he takes in the midrange... he shoots 49% from midrange and 53% at the rim... He should be better at shot fakes at 3 and driving to the hoop to create contact and possibility of 3 pt play.
Image

Return to Boston Celtics