sully00 wrote:165bows wrote:Sully of other cap oriented folks, if you could answer/clarify this it would be appreciated.
I think there is a major cap benefit that hasn't been mentioned regarding Bledsoe vs Jordan. Jordan makes a lot more, we get that. But after next year, Bledsoe is a RFA with a small cap hold. Bradley is the same. So between those two and our other young core players, Green, Rondo and Sully, there could potentially be significant cap space. Cap space that could be used for a legitimate talent, then the two guards re-signed to generous deals with Bird rights.
If Jordan is in place instead of Bledsoe, he eats up a bunch of that space. So he can be used in a sign and trade, but then he's gone as any asset, and the team is dependent on who wants to take him or other salaries. Exactly the problem we have now. With Bledsoe, you keep the asset AND can control the signing process because there is actual cap space.
So some of this is obvious, but I think the specific situation next year makes it a bigger distinction than the basics that have been discussed so far.
Bledsoe's cap hold in his RFA year will be about 6.5 mil.
I think the issue with Bledsoe is that he is involved in other trade talks.
Oh sure. They are looking to turn Bledsoe into another big score. That's my problem with the deal. They get Doc, KG, Pierce, and then another major piece after that?
Heck, they could even wait, and deal Bledsoe at the deadline. Say they take Lee and/or Terry back. If those guys work out as the fifth option, they can move Bledsoe and Crawford (who is unguaranteed after this year) to a team and take back a ~10M player with real value, to a team that doesn't want to take any salary back.
That is two huge wins in a row IMO. Don't see why the Celtics are psyched to facilitate that, or why the Clips think they have the right to win the entire off-season.