ImageImageImage

Summer Trade/(OffSeason) Thread 2017

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

Banks2Pierce
RealGM
Posts: 15,783
And1: 5,324
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
   

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#161 » by Banks2Pierce » Mon May 29, 2017 3:36 pm

Darthlukey wrote:
Banks2Pierce wrote:Having a ton of trouble identifying a good Bradley trade if we know Hayward is coming and Philly's not interested in AB.

Coming to the conclusion that we'll probably need to stack things to get a decent value.


Wolves (current or future first) or Clippers (long term future first)


Would love to get in on that Wolves 1st somehow, but I'm guessing it's too high and valuable for the assets we'd want to part with. Similar logic for the Knicks 1st. I do think teams like LAC and NYK will be very scared to do any sort of future 1sts to us without castrating the bejeezus out of the pick with protections.

I like Juancho for Denver, but they seem fine at sg with Harris and Barton.
User avatar
Stadium5
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,863
And1: 3,556
Joined: May 04, 2013

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#162 » by Stadium5 » Mon May 29, 2017 3:55 pm

canman1971 wrote:
Stadium5 wrote:Avery Bradley & BKN 18 for Klay Thompson & 2020 unprotected 1st

Isaiah Thomas & Crowder for Julius Randle

Fultz
Klay
Brown
Randle
Horford

You should be banned for this.

Why?

Fultz and Klay would be a pretty good backcourt

The IT Randle one is more random. Replace Randle with anything resembling a young rebounder
User avatar
canman1971
Senior Mod - Celtics
Senior Mod - Celtics
Posts: 14,962
And1: 9,012
Joined: May 13, 2003
Location: 18 Championship BLVD
       

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#163 » by canman1971 » Mon May 29, 2017 4:00 pm

Stadium5 wrote:
canman1971 wrote:
Stadium5 wrote:Avery Bradley & BKN 18 for Klay Thompson & 2020 unprotected 1st

Isaiah Thomas & Crowder for Julius Randle

Fultz
Klay
Brown
Randle
Horford

You should be banned for this.

Why?

Fultz and Klay would be a pretty good backcourt

The IT Randle one is more random. Replace Randle with anything resembling a young rebounder

I was being facetious, but that IT trade is just terrible.
User avatar
Stadium5
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,863
And1: 3,556
Joined: May 04, 2013

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#164 » by Stadium5 » Mon May 29, 2017 4:02 pm

canman1971 wrote:
Stadium5 wrote:
canman1971 wrote:You should be banned for this.

Why?

Fultz and Klay would be a pretty good backcourt

The IT Randle one is more random. Replace Randle with anything resembling a young rebounder

I was being facetious, but that IT trade is just terrible.

lol yea amittedly the IT trade proposal was rushed, but you get my point lol. I am actually interested to see what the W's would say about the Bradley/BKN 18 trade. What do C fans think of it?
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,092
And1: 27,961
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#165 » by Fencer reregistered » Mon May 29, 2017 5:00 pm

There's a deal template that isn't much discussed, namely:

1. Celtics renounce FAs other than Olynyk.

2. Celtics use whatever cap space they then have.

3. Celtics THEN acquire a max guy via a S&T that also sends out Olynyk in a S&T. Perhaps Olynyk gets overpaid (his incentive to cooperate) and the Cs reward the team getting him with pick considerations accordingly.


Theoretically, this could happen with the Cs shedding no more players than in scenarios that don't include #2. I.e., the guys going out who have the status of "starter", "main-rotation player" and/or "spot starter" are Amir, JJ, Kelly, Zeller and one of Bradley/Crowder. And there's still an MLE slot for a veteran big.

The luxury tax implications would of course be scary, but it's not our money, provided that Ainge thinks he will have enough roster depth to be able to shrug off "hard cap" considerations.


The obvious fit for the S&T part would be a Knicks/Clips/Celts 3-way:

A. Doc realizes he's losing Griffin.
B. Doc uses the salary slot to absorb Melo without giving up much if any salary in return.
C. Phil Jackson does the deal because he really wants to ditch Melo, because Olynyk is a good passer and shooter who could fit well in the triangle, and because he likes the other value the Cs provide him.

As for how the Cs use their cap space: The highest-concept idea is that they trade Brooklyn 18 and other future picks for Jimmy Butler. The roster of 15 (i.e. not including split contracts) might then be:

Horford/Zizic/[vet placeholder]
Griffin/Crowder/Yabusele/[minimum salary guy #1]
Butler/(Brown)/Green (re-signed)/Nader
Brown/Smart/(Fultz)/(Green)/[minimum salary guy #2]
Thomas/Fultz/(Smart)/Rozier


I assumed Avery goes out (possibly to a fifth team) instead of Crowder for reasons of money and position fit, but a version with Crowder going out would work fine as well.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 43,336
And1: 61,665
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: ▼VII▲VIII
         

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#166 » by Froob » Mon May 29, 2017 7:36 pm

Stadium5 wrote:
canman1971 wrote:
Stadium5 wrote:Why?

Fultz and Klay would be a pretty good backcourt

The IT Randle one is more random. Replace Randle with anything resembling a young rebounder

I was being facetious, but that IT trade is just terrible.

lol yea amittedly the IT trade proposal was rushed, but you get my point lol. I am actually interested to see what the W's would say about the Bradley/BKN 18 trade. What do C fans think of it?

No idea why they would do that, great deal for us though.
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater
threrf23
RealGM
Posts: 15,053
And1: 5,009
Joined: Mar 22, 2004

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#167 » by threrf23 » Mon May 29, 2017 8:51 pm

Roddy wrote:Vucevic could be a nice fit. Good rebounder and shot blocker. He can shoot.

Orlando is going to rebuild. With their 6th pick, they could get Isaac. With Gordon, Isaac and Biyombo, they don't need Vucevic anymore


I was just thinking about this. Vucevic also speaks Ante's language (I think) and has Adriatic league experience. His contract for next season is almost identical to KO's cap hold, Frank Vogel likes big men who can shoot the rock (evidenced by the leaked chalkboard), and we had been rumored to have interest in Vucevic at the deadline. It kind of adds up to make sense.
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#168 » by Andrew McCeltic » Mon May 29, 2017 9:41 pm

Vuc is young enough he can still improve his shot and defense, showing signs. Will be a different player at 29 or 30. Big issue for us is that he's kind of a black hole, won't pass or rotate like Olynyk. Could learn - IT improved beyond his tunnel vision with spacing and responsibility. But that, to me, is the biggest issue.

Actually getting a max guy & then Crowder or an Olynyk sign and trade for Vucevic could be great. Could we do a Milsapp/Horford/Vuc rotation, or maybe trade Jae or Bradley w/ KO to get back Gordon, Hezonja or the 6?
cedric76
RealGM
Posts: 16,257
And1: 3,726
Joined: May 28, 2005

Re: RE: Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#169 » by cedric76 » Mon May 29, 2017 10:11 pm

Andrew McCeltic wrote:Vuc is young enough he can still improve his shot and defense, showing signs. Will be a different player at 29 or 30. Big issue for us is that he's kind of a black hole, won't pass or rotate like Olynyk. Could learn - IT improved beyond his tunnel vision with spacing and responsibility. But that, to me, is the biggest issue.

Actually getting a max guy & then Crowder or an Olynyk sign and trade for Vucevic could be great. Could we do a Milsapp/Horford/Vuc rotation, or maybe trade Jae or Bradley w/ KO to get back Gordon, Hezonja or the 6?

Vuc s défense is very underrated, vogel has praised him a lot this season

Not sure why you call him a black hole, vuc is a very good passer.

He can also shoot the 3 ball but only got green light from coaching staff at end of season

I really hope we don't trade him but I think he d be perfect for you guys.

I think jae would be great for the magic too

I could really see a jae + something for vuc trade

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app
Suggs, AB, Tyus, Jase
Bane, AB, TDS , Jett
Franz, TDS, Panda
P5, JI, Panda, Moe
Wcj, Goga, Moe
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,414
And1: 15,500
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#170 » by bucknersrevenge » Mon May 29, 2017 10:51 pm

Stadium5 wrote:
canman1971 wrote:
Stadium5 wrote:Avery Bradley & BKN 18 for Klay Thompson & 2020 unprotected 1st

Isaiah Thomas & Crowder for Julius Randle

Fultz
Klay
Brown
Randle
Horford

You should be banned for this.

Why?

Fultz and Klay would be a pretty good backcourt

The IT Randle one is more random. Replace Randle with anything resembling a young rebounder


The Klay idea is pretty good. Pretty even trade actually though I can't imagine why GSW would do it. But I lie where your head's at. Can't see why Magic does that deal for Randle though. Think IT would have to goo a team like Sac, Dallas, or NOLA.
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,414
And1: 15,500
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: RE: Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#171 » by bucknersrevenge » Mon May 29, 2017 10:55 pm

cedric76 wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:Vuc is young enough he can still improve his shot and defense, showing signs. Will be a different player at 29 or 30. Big issue for us is that he's kind of a black hole, won't pass or rotate like Olynyk. Could learn - IT improved beyond his tunnel vision with spacing and responsibility. But that, to me, is the biggest issue.

Actually getting a max guy & then Crowder or an Olynyk sign and trade for Vucevic could be great. Could we do a Milsapp/Horford/Vuc rotation, or maybe trade Jae or Bradley w/ KO to get back Gordon, Hezonja or the 6?

Vuc s défense is very underrated, vogel has praised him a lot this season

Not sure why you call him a black hole, vuc is a very good passer.

He can also shoot the 3 ball but only got green light from coaching staff at end of season

I really hope we don't trade him but I think he d be perfect for you guys.

I think jae would be great for the magic too

I could really see a jae + something for vuc trade

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app


I've been on the Vucevic train since mid-season. I'd be fine with him. And agree about his passing. Not sure where the black hole thing comes from either. One of the better assist rates for a Center in the game behind Horford and Gasol. Would absolutely help with the rebounding issue. And by many accounts, this year was at least an average defender.
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: RE: Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#172 » by Andrew McCeltic » Mon May 29, 2017 11:01 pm

cedric76 wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:Vuc is young enough he can still improve his shot and defense, showing signs. Will be a different player at 29 or 30. Big issue for us is that he's kind of a black hole, won't pass or rotate like Olynyk. Could learn - IT improved beyond his tunnel vision with spacing and responsibility. But that, to me, is the biggest issue.

Actually getting a max guy & then Crowder or an Olynyk sign and trade for Vucevic could be great. Could we do a Milsapp/Horford/Vuc rotation, or maybe trade Jae or Bradley w/ KO to get back Gordon, Hezonja or the 6?

Vuc s défense is very underrated, vogel has praised him a lot this season

Not sure why you call him a black hole, vuc is a very good passer.

He can also shoot the 3 ball but only got green light from coaching staff at end of season

I really hope we don't trade him but I think he d be perfect for you guys.

I think jae would be great for the magic too

I could really see a jae + something for vuc trade

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app


I think his defense is improving, and he made an effort under Vogel, which is great. But he's still struggling to reach competence, net positive impact. He's not Marc Gasol. Interesting about the 3 point shot.

Is he a good passer? I'd have to look back at clips and advanced stats - my impression is that even if he can pass, he's a little like Al Jefferson was, ball tends to stick with him. Not great awareness. He's not Blake Griffin in that way, or even Al Horford.

Rebounding a little over-hyped, too - he gets raw numbers, caroms in his vicinity, which is great. But that's it - doesn't get much out of his reach, like DJ or Drummond.

Love him as a player, if he's right for Boston. But if he were as great as you're saying, trading him for Jae Crowder would be foolish.

Definitely better, and trending better, than Greg Monroe.
User avatar
Stadium5
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,863
And1: 3,556
Joined: May 04, 2013

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#173 » by Stadium5 » Mon May 29, 2017 11:24 pm

bucknersrevenge wrote:
Stadium5 wrote:
canman1971 wrote:You should be banned for this.

Why?

Fultz and Klay would be a pretty good backcourt

The IT Randle one is more random. Replace Randle with anything resembling a young rebounder


The Klay idea is pretty good. Pretty even trade actually though I can't imagine why GSW would do it. But I lie where your head's at. Can't see why Magic does that deal for Randle though. Think IT would have to goo a team like Sac, Dallas, or NOLA.

Im thinking with the GSW contract situation coming up, someone has to go. Klay seems to be the odd man out with the Durant addition, and Bradley could give them the defense so its less of a drop off, and he has ok offense with one more year of cheap salary. After next year they can decide about Bradley but with the BKN 18 pick potentially being top 5, it gives GSW a chance at high talent at a cheap rate for a few years..Kind of evens the deal for Klay. Klay I think could thrive on his own team as a top 2 option, and his offense would be instantly impactful for a team like us
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,414
And1: 15,500
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#174 » by bucknersrevenge » Mon May 29, 2017 11:36 pm

Stadium5 wrote:
bucknersrevenge wrote:
Stadium5 wrote:Why?

Fultz and Klay would be a pretty good backcourt

The IT Randle one is more random. Replace Randle with anything resembling a young rebounder


The Klay idea is pretty good. Pretty even trade actually though I can't imagine why GSW would do it. But I lie where your head's at. Can't see why Magic does that deal for Randle though. Think IT would have to goo a team like Sac, Dallas, or NOLA.

Im thinking with the GSW contract situation coming up, someone has to go. Klay seems to be the odd man out with the Durant addition, and Bradley could give them the defense so its less of a drop off, and he has ok offense with one more year of cheap salary. After next year they can decide about Bradley but with the BKN 18 pick potentially being top 5, it gives GSW a chance at high talent at a cheap rate for a few years..Kind of evens the deal for Klay. Klay I think could thrive on his own team as a top 2 option, and his offense would be instantly impactful for a team like us


With the right filler, you can add right on to that couldn't you? Add a Hayward, or a Griffin?? :nod:
How does this look?

Fultz, Klay, Jaylen, Griffin, Horford....

Uhhh...yes please!
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
User avatar
Stadium5
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,863
And1: 3,556
Joined: May 04, 2013

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#175 » by Stadium5 » Mon May 29, 2017 11:40 pm

bucknersrevenge wrote:
Stadium5 wrote:
bucknersrevenge wrote:
The Klay idea is pretty good. Pretty even trade actually though I can't imagine why GSW would do it. But I lie where your head's at. Can't see why Magic does that deal for Randle though. Think IT would have to goo a team like Sac, Dallas, or NOLA.

Im thinking with the GSW contract situation coming up, someone has to go. Klay seems to be the odd man out with the Durant addition, and Bradley could give them the defense so its less of a drop off, and he has ok offense with one more year of cheap salary. After next year they can decide about Bradley but with the BKN 18 pick potentially being top 5, it gives GSW a chance at high talent at a cheap rate for a few years..Kind of evens the deal for Klay. Klay I think could thrive on his own team as a top 2 option, and his offense would be instantly impactful for a team like us


With the right filler, you can add right on to that couldn't you? Add a Hayward, or a Griffin?? :nod:
How does this look?

Fultz, Klay, Jaylen, Griffin, Horford....

Uhhh...yes please!

Dudeeeee thats what Im sayin! lol

You find the right trading parter for Isaiah and complete replace the backcourt with Fultz/Klay and the future and present looks VERY promising
cedric76
RealGM
Posts: 16,257
And1: 3,726
Joined: May 28, 2005

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#176 » by cedric76 » Mon May 29, 2017 11:44 pm

Andrew McCeltic wrote:
cedric76 wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:Vuc is young enough he can still improve his shot and defense, showing signs. Will be a different player at 29 or 30. Big issue for us is that he's kind of a black hole, won't pass or rotate like Olynyk. Could learn - IT improved beyond his tunnel vision with spacing and responsibility. But that, to me, is the biggest issue.

Actually getting a max guy & then Crowder or an Olynyk sign and trade for Vucevic could be great. Could we do a Milsapp/Horford/Vuc rotation, or maybe trade Jae or Bradley w/ KO to get back Gordon, Hezonja or the 6?

Vuc s défense is very underrated, vogel has praised him a lot this season

Not sure why you call him a black hole, vuc is a very good passer.

He can also shoot the 3 ball but only got green light from coaching staff at end of season

I really hope we don't trade him but I think he d be perfect for you guys.

I think jae would be great for the magic too

I could really see a jae + something for vuc trade

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app


I think his defense is improving, and he made an effort under Vogel, which is great. But he's still struggling to reach competence, net positive impact. He's not Marc Gasol. Interesting about the 3 point shot.

Is he a good passer? I'd have to look back at clips and advanced stats - my impression is that even if he can pass, he's a little like Al Jefferson was, ball tends to stick with him. Not great awareness. He's not Blake Griffin in that way, or even Al Horford.

Rebounding a little over-hyped, too - he gets raw numbers, caroms in his vicinity, which is great. But that's it - doesn't get much out of his reach, like DJ or Drummond.

Love him as a player, if he's right for Boston. But if he were as great as you're saying, trading him for Jae Crowder would be foolish.

Definitely better, and trending better, than Greg Monroe.

Yes it would be foolish, this is why I don't want Orlando to trade him, but we need a sf badly and I think Orlando will try to move one of our big for a sf

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app
Suggs, AB, Tyus, Jase
Bane, AB, TDS , Jett
Franz, TDS, Panda
P5, JI, Panda, Moe
Wcj, Goga, Moe
Banks2Pierce
RealGM
Posts: 15,783
And1: 5,324
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
   

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#177 » by Banks2Pierce » Mon May 29, 2017 11:45 pm

I don't even think Klay is better than Hayward. Wouldn't be interested in giving up a BKN pick for him unless other things fell into place.
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,414
And1: 15,500
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#178 » by bucknersrevenge » Mon May 29, 2017 11:45 pm

Stadium5 wrote:
bucknersrevenge wrote:
Stadium5 wrote:Im thinking with the GSW contract situation coming up, someone has to go. Klay seems to be the odd man out with the Durant addition, and Bradley could give them the defense so its less of a drop off, and he has ok offense with one more year of cheap salary. After next year they can decide about Bradley but with the BKN 18 pick potentially being top 5, it gives GSW a chance at high talent at a cheap rate for a few years..Kind of evens the deal for Klay. Klay I think could thrive on his own team as a top 2 option, and his offense would be instantly impactful for a team like us


With the right filler, you can add right on to that couldn't you? Add a Hayward, or a Griffin?? :nod:
How does this look?

Fultz, Klay, Jaylen, Griffin, Horford....

Uhhh...yes please!

Dudeeeee thats what Im sayin! lol

You find the right trading parter for Isaiah and complete replace the backcourt with Fultz/Klay and the future and present looks VERY promising




Image
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,414
And1: 15,500
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#179 » by bucknersrevenge » Tue May 30, 2017 12:12 am

Banks2Pierce wrote:I don't even think Klay is better than Hayward. Wouldn't be interested in giving up a BKN pick for him unless other things fell into place.


Careful.

The Klay you're seeing is fitting into the framework of a team with Hall of Fame talent. On a different team you might see an expansion of skill that may not be as obvious on his current team. Plus, GREAT shooting and a guy that moves well without the ball fits on ANY team.
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
London2Boston
RealGM
Posts: 10,128
And1: 13,003
Joined: Apr 14, 2014
     

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#180 » by London2Boston » Tue May 30, 2017 12:43 am

Klay is comfortably better than Hayward. Dude will go down as 2nd greatest shooter of all time. Plays solid D too.

Return to Boston Celtics