Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
- Iguodaladon
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 951
- And1: 954
- Joined: May 20, 2016
- Location: England
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
DeRozen might be gone, but there's still 1 Choke Brother left in Toronto. Lowry with 0 points in game 1
Obama to Zach Lavine: ‘I used to be able to get up like you back in the day.’
Jaren Jackson Jr on Doncic: 'I thought he was a myth'
Jaren Jackson Jr on Doncic: 'I thought he was a myth'
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
- Shak_Celts
- Forum Mod - Celtics
- Posts: 45,930
- And1: 58,778
- Joined: Feb 07, 2016
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
SmartWentCrazy wrote:I am **** sick and tired of hearing about how the 76ers have the best starting lineup in the NBA and that they have 4 top 30 players. If either of those statements were true, they wouldve rolled the Nets with or without a healthy Embiid.
way too early to be gloating.
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
- BRUNiNHO91
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,764
- And1: 22,744
- Joined: Mar 04, 2009
- Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
Iguodaladon wrote:DeRozen might be gone, but there's still 1 Choke Brother left in Toronto. Lowry with 0 points in game 1
DD with a nice 18/12/6 stat line yesterday in a win. Lowry was always lead choke brother imo.
♣ A new dawn will rise in Boston. #StayLoyal ♣ THANK YOU TRUTH! ♣
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
- Iguodaladon
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 951
- And1: 954
- Joined: May 20, 2016
- Location: England
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:Iguodaladon wrote:DeRozen might be gone, but there's still 1 Choke Brother left in Toronto. Lowry with 0 points in game 1
DD with a nice 18/12/6 stat line yesterday in a win. Lowry was always lead choke brother imo.
They both had some real shockers in the playoffs, but maybe Pop has purged DD of his demons
Obama to Zach Lavine: ‘I used to be able to get up like you back in the day.’
Jaren Jackson Jr on Doncic: 'I thought he was a myth'
Jaren Jackson Jr on Doncic: 'I thought he was a myth'
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 20,749
- And1: 34,847
- Joined: Dec 29, 2014
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
Shak_Celts wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:I am **** sick and tired of hearing about how the 76ers have the best starting lineup in the NBA and that they have 4 top 30 players. If either of those statements were true, they wouldve rolled the Nets with or without a healthy Embiid.
way too early to be gloating.
Not gloating, just sick and tired of seeing every nba writer claim their lineup is Warriors-level. Its not. It wasnt before that game and it sure as **** isnt after.
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,438
- And1: 69,469
- Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
SmartWentCrazy wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:I am **** sick and tired of hearing about how the 76ers have the best starting lineup in the NBA and that they have 4 top 30 players. If either of those statements were true, they wouldve rolled the Nets with or without a healthy Embiid.
way too early to be gloating.
Not gloating, just sick and tired of seeing every nba writer claim their lineup is Warriors-level. Its not. It wasnt before that game and it sure as **** isnt after.
Too flawed and poor fit. Simmons is a destroyer of offensive flow.
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 20,749
- And1: 34,847
- Joined: Dec 29, 2014
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
The Comedian wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:
way too early to be gloating.
Not gloating, just sick and tired of seeing every nba writer claim their lineup is Warriors-level. Its not. It wasnt before that game and it sure as **** isnt after.
Too flawed and poor fit. Simmons is a destroyer of offensive flow.
Simmons needs to play in a system like the Bucks. A post big and iso-heavy/reluctant catch-n-shoot wing are just terrible fits.
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
- Roddy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,010
- And1: 10,807
- Joined: Jun 19, 2010
- Location: France
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,263
- And1: 12,656
- Joined: Jul 07, 2012
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
The Comedian wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:
way too early to be gloating.
Not gloating, just sick and tired of seeing every nba writer claim their lineup is Warriors-level. Its not. It wasnt before that game and it sure as **** isnt after.
Too flawed and poor fit. Simmons is a destroyer of offensive flow.
I remember last year, some people here seriously thought Simmons was better than Giannis. Good times.
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,438
- And1: 69,469
- Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
Valid wrote:The Comedian wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Not gloating, just sick and tired of seeing every nba writer claim their lineup is Warriors-level. Its not. It wasnt before that game and it sure as **** isnt after.
Too flawed and poor fit. Simmons is a destroyer of offensive flow.
I remember last year, some people here seriously thought Simmons was better than Giannis. Good times.
I'm much lower on Simmons than most, but i just don't see it with him. A good team/coach can basically negate him, and I agree with SWC that the fit isnt good, but i think it's also a Simmons issue.
This isn't a Giannis situation, younger Giannis could occasionally make shots from outside the paint and would take a few a game. Ben isn't even a threat to take one, nevermind make one. It's two full seasons into his career, and he has showed ZERO progress with that. He is a monster in transition and a legitimate awesome defender, but I really don't see a crazy high ceiling.
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,494
- And1: 9,120
- Joined: Jul 10, 2004
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
Simmons is an amazing talent but I can’t see how he was near unanimous choice of all GMs for player they want to build around out of sophomore class. Mitchell is so much better. I would take Tatum for sure. Isaac isn’t there yet but I think I’d rather him than Simmons too. I wouldn’t be shocked if Fox is more highly regarded 5 years from now either.
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
- ConstableGeneva
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,454
- And1: 87,240
- Joined: Sep 22, 2012
- Location: Parody Account
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
The Comedian wrote:Valid wrote:The Comedian wrote:
Too flawed and poor fit. Simmons is a destroyer of offensive flow.
I remember last year, some people here seriously thought Simmons was better than Giannis. Good times.
I'm much lower on Simmons than most, but i just don't see it with him. A good team/coach can basically negate him, and I agree with SWC that the fit isnt good, but i think it's also a Simmons issue.
This isn't a Giannis situation, younger Giannis could occasionally make shots from outside the paint and would take a few a game. Ben isn't even a threat to take one, nevermind make one. It's two full seasons into his career, and he has showed ZERO progress with that. He is a monster in transition and a legitimate awesome defender, but I really don't see a crazy high ceiling.
You guys will eat your words when in Year 16, Simmons develops a reliable 18-foot jumper.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
- jmr07019
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,110
- And1: 7,755
- Joined: Oct 29, 2009
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
To be fair to Ben.... he’s just a rookie.
Show Love Spread Love
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
- Shak_Celts
- Forum Mod - Celtics
- Posts: 45,930
- And1: 58,778
- Joined: Feb 07, 2016
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
SmartWentCrazy wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:I am **** sick and tired of hearing about how the 76ers have the best starting lineup in the NBA and that they have 4 top 30 players. If either of those statements were true, they wouldve rolled the Nets with or without a healthy Embiid.
way too early to be gloating.
Not gloating, just sick and tired of seeing every nba writer claim their lineup is Warriors-level. Its not. It wasnt before that game and it sure as **** isnt after.
Ehh, media gon media, gotta ignore them. I feel you on it but not about what one game tells you.
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,027
- And1: 1,962
- Joined: Aug 27, 2017
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
Milwaukee basically getting a first round bye. They’ll be plenty rested when we face them
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,457
- And1: 3,248
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
Fiserv is looouuuuddddddd.
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
- celticfan42487
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,450
- And1: 15,287
- Joined: Jul 22, 2005
- Location: Billerica, MA
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
SmartWentCrazy wrote:The Comedian wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Not gloating, just sick and tired of seeing every nba writer claim their lineup is Warriors-level. Its not. It wasnt before that game and it sure as **** isnt after.
Too flawed and poor fit. Simmons is a destroyer of offensive flow.
Simmons needs to play in a system like the Bucks. A post big and iso-heavy/reluctant catch-n-shoot wing are just terrible fits.
Exactly.
That said the 76ers have a ton of talent on their team. They have 3 legit all-star potential starting level players, and one bench worthy all-star player. The statment that they have the most talented starting 5 after the Warriors is legit.
They were just built like the Lakers, without an understanding that low post doesnt matter, playmaking doesn't matter...if you don't have the shooting.
If Simmons and Embiid checked their egos at the door. Embiid would play like Al Horford for the team and exclusively shoot 3s on offense and facilitate others.
Simmons would have the entire offense built around him because he's useless otherwise
And with 2 minutes left to go in a game, or in a must score situation... Simmons would be on the bench because his floor spacing hurts an ISO from a go to bucket guy such as Butler.
If Stevens had Butler on the Celtics team right now, we'd be heading to the Finals, guaranteed. The 76ers roster construction just has two players that are flawed and not modern NBA players in their construction. And a lack of understanding roster wise that in order to do that you MUST only have one, and you have to build your entire team around them to make up for it.
It's not that hard, you can either sit and wait for Embiid to develop a head and take a huge step back, or you can wait for Simmons to develop a 3 point shot. Otherwise, trade one of those **** for a fellow all-star level player that actual fits the rest of the pieces on your roster and watch your fourtunes rise.
And there's a zillion teams that would trade for either of them as they're young and in team control for a long time and they are elite at their positions. Just held back by playing with each other.
I doubt the Blazers would turn down the chance for a Dame for Simmons trade, or McCollum (whichever they believe in least). Because Simmons is one of the best defenders in the NBA, and he will spend all night getting wide open 3s for Dame or McCollum. And either one of those players would compliment Embiid perfectly when he plays teams that stupidly double him, or just get destroyed by Embiid.
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
- ConstableGeneva
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,454
- And1: 87,240
- Joined: Sep 22, 2012
- Location: Parody Account
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
thelarrybirdx wrote:Milwaukee basically getting a first round bye. They’ll be plenty rested when we face them
They're earned it all season.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,027
- And1: 1,962
- Joined: Aug 27, 2017
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
ConstableGeneva wrote:thelarrybirdx wrote:Milwaukee basically getting a first round bye. They’ll be plenty rested when we face them
They're earned it all season.
I'm not discrediting them whatsoever lol. I'm saying how pathetic the Pistons are.
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,499
- And1: 13,943
- Joined: Jul 05, 2012
- Location: Southern Maryland
- Contact:
Re: Around the NBA (4.0) *Non-Celtics Talk*
SmartWentCrazy wrote:The Comedian wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Not gloating, just sick and tired of seeing every nba writer claim their lineup is Warriors-level. Its not. It wasnt before that game and it sure as **** isnt after.
Too flawed and poor fit. Simmons is a destroyer of offensive flow.
Simmons needs to play in a system like the Bucks. A post big and iso-heavy/reluctant catch-n-shoot wing are just terrible fits.
Actually I don't like the Bucks system for him because he doesn't have the instincts to run it. The Golden State system makes more sense with him fitting the Draymond role. He should not be a primary distributor but running PnR with him and giving him the opportunity to make quick decisions within 15 ft of the rim would make him more effective and more dangerous.
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!
Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured