SMTBSI wrote:MagicBagley18 wrote:If you can get Beal added to brown and Tatum (we can’t) you do it no question. U don’t pass it up bc Tatum and brown looking good together.
That's not the argument though. It's not a matter of declining Beal in lieu of nothing else. If the Beal deal is there, and there's nothing else, of course you take it. It's a question of Beal versus spending the same assets to improve the team in other ways.
Like you, I'm pretty sure it's not even possible to add Beal to Brown and Tatum, but if it was, it would required basically an absolute purge of every single other asset into the foreseeable future. There might be a better strategy, even if that was on the table.
I get that but adding a posey or house type to this team or a veteran combined with internal growth from the j’s still isn’t as impactful as adding a guy who can play both off ball and with the ball, who has great character, gets along and is family with Tatum and also appears friendly with brown. Who also has all nba team potential.
I think beal would fit fine right next to brown and Tatum. I think there would be no jealousy issues or too much ego involved and I think having 3 guys who can go off for 30 any single night and have elite talent is a no brainer. Harden next to those 2 would make more sense for your argument imo.
I’d rather have a beal brown Tatum trio to go up against lebron and AD vs brown and Tatum and depth.














