truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:truth18 wrote:
All of the above.
So what if I were talking with Danny and he told me that he could get Melo for cheap
Yeah, I'm about to blow off work and get high too.
Answer
The
Question.
Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob
truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:truth18 wrote:
All of the above.
So what if I were talking with Danny and he told me that he could get Melo for cheap
Yeah, I'm about to blow off work and get high too.

truth18 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:truth18 wrote:
People will bring up some quote of his (from this year I think) to counter what you are saying but I don't buy it either. I can bring up quotes from Durant about not joining super teams too. That stuff doesn't mean much. I see him staying with the Jazz.
Doesn't Durant leaving for marginally less money run counter to L2B's point that Hayward won't leave marginally more money on the table?
Huh? All I meant is that words mean nothing in this league. Not sure where you are taking this.
Edug27 wrote:truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:
So what if I were talking with Danny and he told me that he could get Melo for cheap
Yeah, I'm about to blow off work and get high too.
Answer
The
Question.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:truth18 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Doesn't Durant leaving for marginally less money run counter to L2B's point that Hayward won't leave marginally more money on the table?
Huh? All I meant is that words mean nothing in this league. Not sure where you are taking this.
Not taking it anywhere, no aggression on my end at all, just confused and trying to have a discussion. My apologies if I misread it or put words on your mouth, but isn't L2B saying Hayward won't leave utah because they can offer the most money? And you said that you agreed and didn't see him leaving either?
Just saw Durant as an example for him leaving, not staying.
truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:truth18 wrote:
Yeah, I'm about to blow off work and get high too.
Answer
The
Question.
No, lol, it's an absurd question.
What world are you living in where the Knicks are a competent organization that will trade him to us for relatively fair value?
Same world where Bulls FO is amazing? Cause it's not the world I'm living in.
Edug27 wrote:truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:
Answer
The
Question.
No, lol, it's an absurd question.
What world are you living in where the Knicks are a competent organization that will trade him to us for relatively fair value?
Same world where Bulls FO is amazing? Cause it's not the world I'm living in.
Well for starters.. Melo has a no trade clause. Which eliminates all chances they get fair value for him. They either let his contract expire, or take a protected pick, some young mediocre players and expiring contracts for him. Melos short list of teams to be traded to don't even have fair value to give up. So if reports are correct that they are forcing him to "want" to be traded, then Phil is aware and ok with this.
truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:truth18 wrote:
No, lol, it's an absurd question.
What world are you living in where the Knicks are a competent organization that will trade him to us for relatively fair value?
Same world where Bulls FO is amazing? Cause it's not the world I'm living in.
Well for starters.. Melo has a no trade clause. Which eliminates all chances they get fair value for him. They either let his contract expire, or take a protected pick, some young mediocre players and expiring contracts for him. Melos short list of teams to be traded to don't even have fair value to give up. So if reports are correct that they are forcing him to "want" to be traded, then Phil is aware and ok with this.
You seem to think that the Knicks are going to be pragmatic and rational regarding Melo. Humorous. We will just have to agree to disagree and see what happens.
Writebloc wrote:Truthfully, if Denver resigned Gallo it would be worse for them, which they might end up doing because of "loyalty." Denver went to Gallo last year to trade him, Gallo declined so they held on to him. Now watch them not trade Gallo and sign him to a huge deal.

Edug27 wrote:truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:
Well for starters.. Melo has a no trade clause. Which eliminates all chances they get fair value for him. They either let his contract expire, or take a protected pick, some young mediocre players and expiring contracts for him. Melos short list of teams to be traded to don't even have fair value to give up. So if reports are correct that they are forcing him to "want" to be traded, then Phil is aware and ok with this.
You seem to think that the Knicks are going to be pragmatic and rational regarding Melo. Humorous. We will just have to agree to disagree and see what happens.
All I'm saying is that there are only 2 realistic scenarios here.
1. Knicks play it out and let his deal expire.
2. Phil wants him off the roster so badly that they take less than "fair value" to get it done.
To think a contender is going to give up fair value for Melo is nonsense. NY doesn't hold the power here. Everything is pointing to Melo being OK with playing this thing out. The ball is in Phils court.
Edug27 wrote:truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:
Well for starters.. Melo has a no trade clause. Which eliminates all chances they get fair value for him. They either let his contract expire, or take a protected pick, some young mediocre players and expiring contracts for him. Melos short list of teams to be traded to don't even have fair value to give up. So if reports are correct that they are forcing him to "want" to be traded, then Phil is aware and ok with this.
You seem to think that the Knicks are going to be pragmatic and rational regarding Melo. Humorous. We will just have to agree to disagree and see what happens.
All I'm saying is that there are only 2 realistic scenarios here.
1. Knicks play it out and let his deal expire.
2. Phil wants him off the roster so badly that they take less than "fair value" to get it done.
To think a contender is going to give up fair value for Melo is nonsense. NY doesn't hold the power here. Everything is pointing to Melo being OK with playing this thing out. The ball is in Phils court.
truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:truth18 wrote:
You seem to think that the Knicks are going to be pragmatic and rational regarding Melo. Humorous. We will just have to agree to disagree and see what happens.
All I'm saying is that there are only 2 realistic scenarios here.
1. Knicks play it out and let his deal expire.
2. Phil wants him off the roster so badly that they take less than "fair value" to get it done.
To think a contender is going to give up fair value for Melo is nonsense. NY doesn't hold the power here. Everything is pointing to Melo being OK with playing this thing out. The ball is in Phils court.
Precisely. Understand my first post better now? Melo isn't coming here. He may not be going anywhere.
truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:truth18 wrote:
Yeah, I'm about to blow off work and get high too.
Answer
The
Question.
No, lol, it's an absurd question.
What world are you living in where the Knicks are a competent organization that will trade him to us for relatively fair value?
Same world where Bulls FO is amazing? Cause it's not the world I'm living in.
If cows were kittens there would be a milk shortage. They aren't. Knicks FO ain't dealing us to him cheap.
Edug27 wrote:truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:
Well for starters.. Melo has a no trade clause. Which eliminates all chances they get fair value for him. They either let his contract expire, or take a protected pick, some young mediocre players and expiring contracts for him. Melos short list of teams to be traded to don't even have fair value to give up. So if reports are correct that they are forcing him to "want" to be traded, then Phil is aware and ok with this.
You seem to think that the Knicks are going to be pragmatic and rational regarding Melo. Humorous. We will just have to agree to disagree and see what happens.
All I'm saying is that there are only 2 realistic scenarios here.
1. Knicks play it out and let his deal expire.
2. Phil wants him off the roster so badly that they take less than "fair value" to get it done.
To think a contender is going to give up fair value for Melo is nonsense. NY doesn't hold the power here. Everything is pointing to Melo being OK with playing this thing out. The ball is in Phils court.
London2Boston wrote:People really think Hayward going to take less money to come here? I don't see it personally.
Edug27 wrote:truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:
All I'm saying is that there are only 2 realistic scenarios here.
1. Knicks play it out and let his deal expire.
2. Phil wants him off the roster so badly that they take less than "fair value" to get it done.
To think a contender is going to give up fair value for Melo is nonsense. NY doesn't hold the power here. Everything is pointing to Melo being OK with playing this thing out. The ball is in Phils court.
Precisely. Understand my first post better now? Melo isn't coming here. He may not be going anywhere.
I took NoCuz and NoMelo as "not good fits here". But if that's your logic then allow me to further it... NoElitePlayer
chrisab123 wrote:The conversation ends with Melo unwilling to waive his clause to go to Boston. His wife and her career would be hurt by the move. Better chance of going to Brooklyn or LA to be honest.
Captain_Caveman wrote:truth18 wrote:Edug27 wrote:
Answer
The
Question.
No, lol, it's an absurd question.
What world are you living in where the Knicks are a competent organization that will trade him to us for relatively fair value?
Same world where Bulls FO is amazing? Cause it's not the world I'm living in.
If cows were kittens there would be a milk shortage. They aren't. Knicks FO ain't dealing us to him cheap.
Not sure. Amir/Zeller and lesser picks could get it done. The waters are already poisoned in terms of keeping him, and there won't be much of a market for him -- which will only be further constrained by his no-trade.
I 100% agree with you on him being a POS that we shouldn't trade for, I just think the Knicks are in a bad spot. They need to hit reset and dump some ballast.
Captain_Caveman wrote:chrisab123 wrote:The conversation ends with Melo unwilling to waive his clause to go to Boston. His wife and her career would be hurt by the move. Better chance of going to Brooklyn or LA to be honest.
I think the conversation ends when Ainge hangs up the phone, personally.
chrisab123 wrote:The conversation ends with Melo unwilling to waive his clause to go to Boston. His wife and her career would be hurt by the move. Better chance of going to Brooklyn or LA to be honest.