ImageImageImage

Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, canman1971

User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,192
And1: 15,058
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1661 » by 165bows » Tue Aug 29, 2023 10:12 pm

31to6 wrote:
165bows wrote:
31to6 wrote:
state can't even land a proper hurricane for a variety of geographic factors

Oh man I'm from there originally, don't even get me started. On the Warriors, I'm already pulling for a solid lotto pick hard. I'm going to take this one seriously, get my draft binkies lined up and everything.


I have enough friends in San Diego to be glad Hilary fizzled. I do think their state is going to end up in the ocean and/or on fire, though, and I know we have some great CA posters so nothing but love to them.

In terms of the Warriors this year, a lottery pick would have to mean some significant injuries (especially to Steph) and I don't root for that -- so in terms of a pick watch thread I'm going to hope for something like the 20th pick to be in play, assuming they sort of ease their way through the regular season. Come next spring, I think if healthy they're still one of the favorites.

If we had this thing a couple of years later, it'd be gold, Jerry, gold.
Honest question: is Wiggins expected to be fully back?

Idk if that's even the case. I mean, they prob make the playoffs but they spent a lot of the year on the outside looking in (under .500 at game 41) and there is now another year of tread less on the tires. Injuries are one thing (just happen with more frequency for older guys) but they are a Curry slump away from being really pretty poor (Curry was 46% from 3, 69TS% in wins, 39% 3PT% 62TS% in losses - basically just really good instead of all time great).
User avatar
shackles10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 12,362
And1: 7,224
Joined: May 13, 2004
Location: Indiana
 

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1662 » by shackles10 » Tue Aug 29, 2023 11:43 pm

Why is TyTy getting a 2-way with Milwaukee and not us? It’s been a long time since I’ve had a UK binky in green and could use something to remove the James Young aftertaste because that was super awful.
User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,735
And1: 31,320
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1663 » by 31to6 » Wed Aug 30, 2023 1:09 am

165bows wrote:
31to6 wrote:
165bows wrote:Oh man I'm from there originally, don't even get me started. On the Warriors, I'm already pulling for a solid lotto pick hard. I'm going to take this one seriously, get my draft binkies lined up and everything.


I have enough friends in San Diego to be glad Hilary fizzled. I do think their state is going to end up in the ocean and/or on fire, though, and I know we have some great CA posters so nothing but love to them.

In terms of the Warriors this year, a lottery pick would have to mean some significant injuries (especially to Steph) and I don't root for that -- so in terms of a pick watch thread I'm going to hope for something like the 20th pick to be in play, assuming they sort of ease their way through the regular season. Come next spring, I think if healthy they're still one of the favorites.

If we had this thing a couple of years later, it'd be gold, Jerry, gold.
Honest question: is Wiggins expected to be fully back?

Idk if that's even the case. I mean, they prob make the playoffs but they spent a lot of the year on the outside looking in (under .500 at game 41) and there is now another year of tread less on the tires. Injuries are one thing (just happen with more frequency for older guys) but they are a Curry slump away from being really pretty poor (Curry was 46% from 3, 69TS% in wins, 39% 3PT% 62TS% in losses - basically just really good instead of all time great).


I don't claim to follow them closely, but seems like they had a massive title hangover to start last season, and the Poole/Draymond situation to boot. Then got their stuff together but injuries and Wiggins absence kept them down a bit. I can easily picture them coming into this season -- with CP replacing Poole -- ready to act like the team they are from the start a bit more. Maybe not challenging long for the top seed in the West, but again my hope is going to be that the pick ends up around 20. But: we'll see, and yes we should most definitely have a thread about it!
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,192
And1: 15,058
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1664 » by 165bows » Wed Aug 30, 2023 12:31 pm

31to6 wrote:
165bows wrote:
31to6 wrote:
I have enough friends in San Diego to be glad Hilary fizzled. I do think their state is going to end up in the ocean and/or on fire, though, and I know we have some great CA posters so nothing but love to them.

In terms of the Warriors this year, a lottery pick would have to mean some significant injuries (especially to Steph) and I don't root for that -- so in terms of a pick watch thread I'm going to hope for something like the 20th pick to be in play, assuming they sort of ease their way through the regular season. Come next spring, I think if healthy they're still one of the favorites.

If we had this thing a couple of years later, it'd be gold, Jerry, gold.
Honest question: is Wiggins expected to be fully back?

Idk if that's even the case. I mean, they prob make the playoffs but they spent a lot of the year on the outside looking in (under .500 at game 41) and there is now another year of tread less on the tires. Injuries are one thing (just happen with more frequency for older guys) but they are a Curry slump away from being really pretty poor (Curry was 46% from 3, 69TS% in wins, 39% 3PT% 62TS% in losses - basically just really good instead of all time great).


I don't claim to follow them closely, but seems like they had a massive title hangover to start last season, and the Poole/Draymond situation to boot. Then got their stuff together but injuries and Wiggins absence kept them down a bit. I can easily picture them coming into this season -- with CP replacing Poole -- ready to act like the team they are from the start a bit more. Maybe not challenging long for the top seed in the West, but again my hope is going to be that the pick ends up around 20. But: we'll see, and yes we should most definitely have a thread about it!

They oddly didn't really slump without Wiggins - better record last year without him than with him. Tons of talk about the Poole punch but last year they were bad at turning the ball over (league worst), FTAs (league worst), and it seems like their D slipped across the board. Basically the whole thing rests on them being elite shooters, which being the elite shooters of all time obviously helps, but they are also old as crap and very small in the back court to boot.

So my thesis is that if their shooting slumps (ie, isn't all-world elite), they might really struggle for stretches. Paul helps with the TO issue but they also lost 4400 minutes from Poole/DiVincenzo leaving and Paul isn't replacing close to half that, someone else on the roster has to pick it up.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,472
And1: 21,411
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1665 » by Hal14 » Wed Aug 30, 2023 1:27 pm

shackles10 wrote:Why is TyTy getting a 2-way with Milwaukee and not us? It’s been a long time since I’ve had a UK binky in green and could use something to remove the James Young aftertaste because that was super awful.

Well, we already have JD. And we signed DJ Steward to a camp deal.

I know, Steward is more of a 2 than a 1. But Washington is like a combo-guard and he's not that big. So between JD and Steward and Scrubb, I'm not sure what Washington would add that those guys don't.

I mean, Washington did get drafted higher than JD and showed more promise when he got NBA minutes last season. I suppose we could have just waived JD and signed Washington. But Brad probably just figures it's not worth it to do that. Why bother bringing in Washington for a workout and having all the coaches watch him and meet with him and everything and then discuss as a staff whether we should waive a small, unproven young PG on a 2-way in order to sign a different small, unproven, young PG to a 2-way.

Brad probably just figures the staff's time is better well spent on other areas - like filling the last 2 roster spots, filling the last 2-way spot (with a forward or center), discuss potential D-White and Pritchard extensions, explore trades..
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,472
And1: 21,411
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1666 » by Hal14 » Wed Aug 30, 2023 1:33 pm

165bows wrote:
31to6 wrote:
165bows wrote:Idk if that's even the case. I mean, they prob make the playoffs but they spent a lot of the year on the outside looking in (under .500 at game 41) and there is now another year of tread less on the tires. Injuries are one thing (just happen with more frequency for older guys) but they are a Curry slump away from being really pretty poor (Curry was 46% from 3, 69TS% in wins, 39% 3PT% 62TS% in losses - basically just really good instead of all time great).


I don't claim to follow them closely, but seems like they had a massive title hangover to start last season, and the Poole/Draymond situation to boot. Then got their stuff together but injuries and Wiggins absence kept them down a bit. I can easily picture them coming into this season -- with CP replacing Poole -- ready to act like the team they are from the start a bit more. Maybe not challenging long for the top seed in the West, but again my hope is going to be that the pick ends up around 20. But: we'll see, and yes we should most definitely have a thread about it!

They oddly didn't really slump without Wiggins - better record last year without him than with him. Tons of talk about the Poole punch but last year they were bad at turning the ball over (league worst), FTAs (league worst), and it seems like their D slipped across the board. Basically the whole thing rests on them being elite shooters, which being the elite shooters of all time obviously helps, but they are also old as crap and very small in the back court to boot.

So my thesis is that if their shooting slumps (ie, isn't all-world elite), they might really struggle for stretches. Paul helps with the TO issue but they also lost 4400 minutes from Poole/DiVincenzo leaving and Paul isn't replacing close to half that, someone else on the roster has to pick it up.

Solid breakdown. I think the warriors might have 1 more title run in them but from what you're saying, it seems like a good chance their window has closed.

As far as filling those minutes left by Poole/DiVencenzo, it'll be interesting. They're probably hoping that Kuminga and Moody take a leap. Then you've got Cory Joseph, Ty Jerome and rookie Brandon Podziemski - I figured the 3 of them fight for bench minutes and they hope 1 or 2 of them emerges to give them some good minutes.

Saric could be a slight upgrade over what JaMychal Green gave them last season.

And they might end up going with bigger lineups more often. If Jackson-Davis is ready to contribute as a rookie, they could have a pretty decent big man rotation with Looney, Draymond, Saric and TJD.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,192
And1: 15,058
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1667 » by 165bows » Wed Aug 30, 2023 2:57 pm

Hal14 wrote:
165bows wrote:
31to6 wrote:
I don't claim to follow them closely, but seems like they had a massive title hangover to start last season, and the Poole/Draymond situation to boot. Then got their stuff together but injuries and Wiggins absence kept them down a bit. I can easily picture them coming into this season -- with CP replacing Poole -- ready to act like the team they are from the start a bit more. Maybe not challenging long for the top seed in the West, but again my hope is going to be that the pick ends up around 20. But: we'll see, and yes we should most definitely have a thread about it!

They oddly didn't really slump without Wiggins - better record last year without him than with him. Tons of talk about the Poole punch but last year they were bad at turning the ball over (league worst), FTAs (league worst), and it seems like their D slipped across the board. Basically the whole thing rests on them being elite shooters, which being the elite shooters of all time obviously helps, but they are also old as crap and very small in the back court to boot.

So my thesis is that if their shooting slumps (ie, isn't all-world elite), they might really struggle for stretches. Paul helps with the TO issue but they also lost 4400 minutes from Poole/DiVincenzo leaving and Paul isn't replacing close to half that, someone else on the roster has to pick it up.

Solid breakdown. I think the warriors might have 1 more title run in them but from what you're saying, it seems like a good chance their window has closed.

As far as filling those minutes left by Poole/DiVencenzo, it'll be interesting. They're probably hoping that Kuminga and Moody take a leap. Then you've got Cory Joseph, Ty Jerome and rookie Bradon Podziemski - I figured the 3 of them fight for bench minutes and they hope 1 or 2 of them emerges to give them some good minutes.

Saric could be a slight upgrade over what JaMychal Green gave them last season.

And they might end up going with bigger lineups more often. If Jackson-Davis is ready to contribute as a rookie, they could have a pretty decent big man rotation with Looney, Draymond, Saric and TJD.

Yup from afar I agree on a lot of this. Seems like they are destined to go big much more frequently. Paul ought to be an upgrade but Poole was the one other guy that got to the line and now there is no one other than Curry that gets FTs at all and leaning on him to draw a ton of contact doesn't seem wise. Poole was also the one reliable minutes guy last year and is getting replaced by one of the oldest guys in the league and a bunch of untested guys or hodge podge.

So the upside is there but I think they won't be a great regular season team as they aren't that deep with guys that can eat a lot of minutes. Also think that if Curry slips from elite to very good even that won't play well as so much is riding on him continuing to be all-time. Greatest shooter of all time and one of the best players of all time but his longevity is almost as impressive, we will see how it holds up.
Smart2Nesmith43
Starter
Posts: 2,373
And1: 6,585
Joined: Nov 06, 2021
 

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1668 » by Smart2Nesmith43 » Wed Aug 30, 2023 5:49 pm

165bows wrote:They oddly didn't really slump without Wiggins - better record last year without him than with him. Tons of talk about the Poole punch but last year they were bad at turning the ball over (league worst), FTAs (league worst), and it seems like their D slipped across the board. Basically the whole thing rests on them being elite shooters, which being the elite shooters of all time obviously helps, but they are also old as crap and very small in the back court to boot.

So my thesis is that if their shooting slumps (ie, isn't all-world elite), they might really struggle for stretches. Paul helps with the TO issue but they also lost 4400 minutes from Poole/DiVincenzo leaving and Paul isn't replacing close to half that, someone else on the roster has to pick it up.

They are also small (and unathletic) in the frontcourt. Looney, Green and Saric are their only bigs and they aren't exactly 7 footers.
Their roster construction is just odd. It's a bunch of really old dudes trying to squeeze a few more seasons out of their careers and then guys on their rookie contract with very little in between.

JaMychal Green, Ty Jerome and Anthony Lamb are also gone. They might not have been great but you still have to fill those minutes with real NBA players to replace their production and the Warriors haven't done that. I don't think people realise how much depth they lost this offseason.
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1669 » by ConstableGeneva » Wed Aug 30, 2023 5:49 pm

Did anti-Celtics fans just bully this referee into retirement?
Read on Twitter
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,472
And1: 21,411
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1670 » by Hal14 » Wed Aug 30, 2023 6:26 pm

Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:
165bows wrote:They oddly didn't really slump without Wiggins - better record last year without him than with him. Tons of talk about the Poole punch but last year they were bad at turning the ball over (league worst), FTAs (league worst), and it seems like their D slipped across the board. Basically the whole thing rests on them being elite shooters, which being the elite shooters of all time obviously helps, but they are also old as crap and very small in the back court to boot.

So my thesis is that if their shooting slumps (ie, isn't all-world elite), they might really struggle for stretches. Paul helps with the TO issue but they also lost 4400 minutes from Poole/DiVincenzo leaving and Paul isn't replacing close to half that, someone else on the roster has to pick it up.

They are also small (and unathletic) in the frontcourt. Looney, Green and Saric are their only bigs and they aren't exactly 7 footers.
Their roster construction is just odd. It's a bunch of really old dudes trying to squeeze a few more seasons out of their careers and then guys on their rookie contract with very little in between.

JaMychal Green, Ty Jerome and Anthony Lamb are also gone. They might not have been great but you still have to fill those minutes with real NBA players to replace their production and the Warriors haven't done that. I don't think people realise how much depth they lost this offseason.

I think they're hoping Jackson-Davis can contribute as a rookie. He'd give them some athleticism in the front court. He's a little bit undersized for a big, though. But Looney has decent size for a big. Saric gives them a big who can shoot..

They've got some good coaches and some of the best players to ever play the game. They'll be pretty good, I think..
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,944
And1: 24,892
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1671 » by playa-hater » Wed Aug 30, 2023 9:14 pm

I am honored to have met with Former NBA player... and champion, and beater of the Miami Heat and Lebron... This man is a true gentleman, down to earth..almost. not recognizable.. as he barely looks 5'8..

That gentleman is none other than JJ Barea..

With his son playing in the same Travel team organization as mine, it should be a nice experience going forward us..
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,192
And1: 15,058
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1672 » by 165bows » Wed Aug 30, 2023 10:18 pm

Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:
165bows wrote:They oddly didn't really slump without Wiggins - better record last year without him than with him. Tons of talk about the Poole punch but last year they were bad at turning the ball over (league worst), FTAs (league worst), and it seems like their D slipped across the board. Basically the whole thing rests on them being elite shooters, which being the elite shooters of all time obviously helps, but they are also old as crap and very small in the back court to boot.

So my thesis is that if their shooting slumps (ie, isn't all-world elite), they might really struggle for stretches. Paul helps with the TO issue but they also lost 4400 minutes from Poole/DiVincenzo leaving and Paul isn't replacing close to half that, someone else on the roster has to pick it up.

They are also small (and unathletic) in the frontcourt. Looney, Green and Saric are their only bigs and they aren't exactly 7 footers.
Their roster construction is just odd. It's a bunch of really old dudes trying to squeeze a few more seasons out of their careers and then guys on their rookie contract with very little in between.

JaMychal Green, Ty Jerome and Anthony Lamb are also gone. They might not have been great but you still have to fill those minutes with real NBA players to replace their production and the Warriors haven't done that. I don't think people realise how much depth they lost this offseason.

Agree on the last part, Corey Joseph doesn’t do it for me and while I really liked Podz in the draft it’s asking a lot right away. A lot really rides on Payton being able to play well consistently, but he was just injured all season and has never been a consistent NBA player minutes wise and is over 30.

The front court isn’t traditionally athletic but Looney/Dray have always hard weirdly high levels of old man strength.
Smart2Nesmith43
Starter
Posts: 2,373
And1: 6,585
Joined: Nov 06, 2021
 

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1673 » by Smart2Nesmith43 » Thu Aug 31, 2023 9:34 am

Hal14 wrote:
Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:They are also small (and unathletic) in the frontcourt. Looney, Green and Saric are their only bigs and they aren't exactly 7 footers.
Their roster construction is just odd. It's a bunch of really old dudes trying to squeeze a few more seasons out of their careers and then guys on their rookie contract with very little in between.

JaMychal Green, Ty Jerome and Anthony Lamb are also gone. They might not have been great but you still have to fill those minutes with real NBA players to replace their production and the Warriors haven't done that. I don't think people realise how much depth they lost this offseason.

I think they're hoping Jackson-Davis can contribute as a rookie. He'd give them some athleticism in the front court. He's a little bit undersized for a big, though. But Looney has decent size for a big. Saric gives them a big who can shoot..

They've got some good coaches and some of the best players to ever play the game. They'll be pretty good, I think..

Relying on a late second round rookie to come in and provide anything is just about the clearest indication that a roster has structural issues.

I'm not saying Jackson-Davis won't have a nice career but there's like a 98% chance he's not even replacement level this season (and that might be optimistic). As a reference point, Andrew Nembhard was the only second rounder last year to play real minutes while Jaylin Willians is the only one (barely) that played better than replacement level. Both were picked way earlier (31st and 34th respectively). Late second rounders just don't come in and play well right away, even the rare ones that turn into real NBA players down the line.

There's only one way for the Warriors to be good this year and that's Curry continuing to play like a top 5 player. Yeah if you can guarantee he plays 75 games they'll be in the playoffs but if he's missing around 20 games as usual I'm not so sure.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,472
And1: 21,411
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1674 » by Hal14 » Thu Aug 31, 2023 12:36 pm

Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:
Hal14 wrote:
Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:They are also small (and unathletic) in the frontcourt. Looney, Green and Saric are their only bigs and they aren't exactly 7 footers.
Their roster construction is just odd. It's a bunch of really old dudes trying to squeeze a few more seasons out of their careers and then guys on their rookie contract with very little in between.

JaMychal Green, Ty Jerome and Anthony Lamb are also gone. They might not have been great but you still have to fill those minutes with real NBA players to replace their production and the Warriors haven't done that. I don't think people realise how much depth they lost this offseason.

I think they're hoping Jackson-Davis can contribute as a rookie. He'd give them some athleticism in the front court. He's a little bit undersized for a big, though. But Looney has decent size for a big. Saric gives them a big who can shoot..

They've got some good coaches and some of the best players to ever play the game. They'll be pretty good, I think..

Relying on a late second round rookie to come in and provide anything is just about the clearest indication that a roster has structural issues.

I'm not saying Jackson-Davis won't have a nice career but there's like a 98% chance he's not even replacement level this season (and that might be optimistic). As a reference point, Andrew Nembhard was the only second rounder last year to play real minutes while Jaylin Willians is the only one (barely) that played better than replacement level. Both were picked way earlier (31st and 34th respectively). Late second rounders just don't come in and play well right away, even the rare ones that turn into real NBA players down the line.

There's only one way for the Warriors to be good this year and that's Curry continuing to play like a top 5 player. Yeah if you can guarantee he plays 75 games they'll be in the playoffs but if he's missing around 20 games as usual I'm not so sure.

TJD is not a typical late 2nd rounder. He was projected by pretty much everyone to go in the 26-38 range. It was a shock to everyone that he fell that far.

https://www.si.com/college/indiana/basketball/coaches-call-golden-state-warriors-trayce-jackson-davis-best-second-round-value-in-2023-nba-draft

This says "Jackson-Davis plans to sign a three-year deal with a team option in Year 3, a league source told Fieldhouse Files. And new Warriors general manager Mike Dunleavy Jr., a former Pacer, said Jackson-Davis will be part of the 15-man roster right away. That’s important because players selected after about 40 are typically signed to a two-way or non-guaranteed contract."

https://www.fieldhousefiles.com/p/warriors-buy-pick-draft-trayce-jackson-davis

Rumor has it, a few teams picking in the 30's and 40s were calling up his agent during the draft and asking if he would accept a 2-way contract. He said no, and that's why he fell to 57. The deeper we got into the draft, and into the 50's, those teams picking wanted the flexibility of being able to put that player on a 2-way. The warriors were the only team willing to give him a standard contract, and they traded with Washington to get that pick where the drafted him.

Lastly, TJD is not some young 19 yr old kid who is raw ad will need all kinds of development before he's ready for NBA minutes. He's 23 yrs old, will turn 24 during the upcoming season, played 4 yrs of college ball and was arguably the best college player in the country last season - he's polished, not raw. He certainly could be ready to contribute from day 1.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,472
And1: 21,411
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1675 » by Hal14 » Thu Aug 31, 2023 12:38 pm

playa-hater wrote:I am honored to have met with Former NBA player... and champion, and beater of the Miami Heat and Lebron... This man is a true gentleman, down to earth..almost. not recognizable.. as he barely looks 5'8..

That gentleman is none other than JJ Barea..

With his son playing in the same Travel team organization as mine, it should be a nice experience going forward us..

I have a lot of respect for guys that little who were able to make it in the league. Barea was fun to watch. That's cool he's a nice guy. I bet he's got some good stories.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,944
And1: 24,892
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1676 » by playa-hater » Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:48 pm

Hal14 wrote:
playa-hater wrote:I am honored to have met with Former NBA player... and champion, and beater of the Miami Heat and Lebron... This man is a true gentleman, down to earth..almost. not recognizable.. as he barely looks 5'8..

That gentleman is none other than JJ Barea..

With his son playing in the same Travel team organization as mine, it should be a nice experience going forward us..

I have a lot of respect for guys that little who were able to make it in the league. Barea was fun to watch. That's cool he's a nice guy. I bet he's got some good stories.


Give me some time to work that angle. That is a priority for me. :nod:
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,129
And1: 98,298
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1677 » by zoyathedestroya » Thu Aug 31, 2023 5:07 pm

Read on Twitter

Bank shot is a lost art but this is new to me. Sensible though.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,192
And1: 15,058
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1678 » by 165bows » Thu Aug 31, 2023 5:21 pm

Hal14 wrote:
Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:
Hal14 wrote:I think they're hoping Jackson-Davis can contribute as a rookie. He'd give them some athleticism in the front court. He's a little bit undersized for a big, though. But Looney has decent size for a big. Saric gives them a big who can shoot..

They've got some good coaches and some of the best players to ever play the game. They'll be pretty good, I think..

Relying on a late second round rookie to come in and provide anything is just about the clearest indication that a roster has structural issues.

I'm not saying Jackson-Davis won't have a nice career but there's like a 98% chance he's not even replacement level this season (and that might be optimistic). As a reference point, Andrew Nembhard was the only second rounder last year to play real minutes while Jaylin Willians is the only one (barely) that played better than replacement level. Both were picked way earlier (31st and 34th respectively). Late second rounders just don't come in and play well right away, even the rare ones that turn into real NBA players down the line.

There's only one way for the Warriors to be good this year and that's Curry continuing to play like a top 5 player. Yeah if you can guarantee he plays 75 games they'll be in the playoffs but if he's missing around 20 games as usual I'm not so sure.

TJD is not a typical late 2nd rounder. He was projected by pretty much everyone to go in the 26-38 range. It was a shock to everyone that he fell that far.

https://www.si.com/college/indiana/basketball/coaches-call-golden-state-warriors-trayce-jackson-davis-best-second-round-value-in-2023-nba-draft

This says "Jackson-Davis plans to sign a three-year deal with a team option in Year 3, a league source told Fieldhouse Files. And new Warriors general manager Mike Dunleavy Jr., a former Pacer, said Jackson-Davis will be part of the 15-man roster right away. That’s important because players selected after about 40 are typically signed to a two-way or non-guaranteed contract."

https://www.fieldhousefiles.com/p/warriors-buy-pick-draft-trayce-jackson-davis

Rumor has it, a few teams picking in the 30's and 40s were calling up his agent during the draft and asking if he would accept a 2-way contract. He said no, and that's why he fell to 57. The deeper we got into the draft, and into the 50's, those teams picking wanted the flexibility of being able to put that player on a 2-way. The warriors were the only team willing to give him a standard contract, and they traded with Washington to get that pick where the drafted him.

Lastly, TJD is not some young 19 yr old kid who is raw ad will need all kinds of development before he's ready for NBA minutes. He's 23 yrs old, will turn 24 during the upcoming season, played 4 yrs of college ball and was arguably the best college player in the country last season - he's polished, not raw. He certainly could be ready to contribute from day 1.

I was big on TJD coming into the draft, was on my list of desired picks - that said, if no one wanted to give him a second round deal that does say quite a bit. A standard second round deal would be for a lot more money and would lock him into a team control for 24-27, basically his prime years.

I do think GS is a great fit for him as they like passing bigs and probably have some playing time. I really do wonder if his defense is suspect though (GS was willing to give Trevion Williams a go after he couldn't hook on in Boston).

Only other better fit for him imo would have been Boston, since they have bigs handle/pass a lot but they also have shooting in the front court so he could have played a real hybrid 4/5 spot here.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,472
And1: 21,411
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1679 » by Hal14 » Thu Aug 31, 2023 5:39 pm

165bows wrote:
Hal14 wrote:
Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:Relying on a late second round rookie to come in and provide anything is just about the clearest indication that a roster has structural issues.

I'm not saying Jackson-Davis won't have a nice career but there's like a 98% chance he's not even replacement level this season (and that might be optimistic). As a reference point, Andrew Nembhard was the only second rounder last year to play real minutes while Jaylin Willians is the only one (barely) that played better than replacement level. Both were picked way earlier (31st and 34th respectively). Late second rounders just don't come in and play well right away, even the rare ones that turn into real NBA players down the line.

There's only one way for the Warriors to be good this year and that's Curry continuing to play like a top 5 player. Yeah if you can guarantee he plays 75 games they'll be in the playoffs but if he's missing around 20 games as usual I'm not so sure.

TJD is not a typical late 2nd rounder. He was projected by pretty much everyone to go in the 26-38 range. It was a shock to everyone that he fell that far.

https://www.si.com/college/indiana/basketball/coaches-call-golden-state-warriors-trayce-jackson-davis-best-second-round-value-in-2023-nba-draft

This says "Jackson-Davis plans to sign a three-year deal with a team option in Year 3, a league source told Fieldhouse Files. And new Warriors general manager Mike Dunleavy Jr., a former Pacer, said Jackson-Davis will be part of the 15-man roster right away. That’s important because players selected after about 40 are typically signed to a two-way or non-guaranteed contract."

https://www.fieldhousefiles.com/p/warriors-buy-pick-draft-trayce-jackson-davis

Rumor has it, a few teams picking in the 30's and 40s were calling up his agent during the draft and asking if he would accept a 2-way contract. He said no, and that's why he fell to 57. The deeper we got into the draft, and into the 50's, those teams picking wanted the flexibility of being able to put that player on a 2-way. The warriors were the only team willing to give him a standard contract, and they traded with Washington to get that pick where the drafted him.

Lastly, TJD is not some young 19 yr old kid who is raw ad will need all kinds of development before he's ready for NBA minutes. He's 23 yrs old, will turn 24 during the upcoming season, played 4 yrs of college ball and was arguably the best college player in the country last season - he's polished, not raw. He certainly could be ready to contribute from day 1.

I was big on TJD coming into the draft, was on my list of desired picks - that said, if no one wanted to give him a second round deal that does say quite a bit. A standard second round deal would be for a lot more money and would lock him into a team control for 24-27, basically his prime years.

I do think GS is a great fit for him as they like passing bigs and probably have some playing time. I really do wonder if his defense is suspect though (GS was willing to give Trevion Williams a go after he couldn't hook on in Boston).

Only other better fit for him imo would have been Boston, since they have bigs handle/pass a lot but they also have shooting in the front court so he could have played a real hybrid 4/5 spot here.

Well, I think starting around pick 35, teams are gonna try and see if you will take a 2-way rather than having to commit a standard roster spot to a guy picked that late in the draft. So I don't really see it as a red flag. It happens every year where guys slip later in the 2nd round than anticipated (Jaden Hardy, EJ Liddell, Jabari Walker in 2022. In 2023 it was TJD, Rayan Rupert, Cissoko and GG Jackson).

TJD's defense is good. Solid for a big at switching out on the perimeter, good rim protector. His only issue defensively is being able to body up, muscle and defend really big guys like Zach Edey and Hunter Dickinson down in the low post, who had their way with him. But really big huge guys like that posting up on the low block is not a very common thing in today's NBA.

His fit with GS could be pretty good. Especially if the jumper comes along. He did not shoot much at all in college and when he did, they didn't go in, but he did look pretty good shooting jumpers at his Pro Day at the combine so we'll see if that translates..

TJD is much better defensively than Trevion Williams. Night and day difference there. TJD is also more athletic, more explosive, more mobile..was much more productive in college..
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,192
And1: 15,058
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Around the NBA (and other Sports), Con't 

Post#1680 » by 165bows » Thu Aug 31, 2023 7:00 pm

Hal14 wrote:
165bows wrote:
Hal14 wrote:TJD is not a typical late 2nd rounder. He was projected by pretty much everyone to go in the 26-38 range. It was a shock to everyone that he fell that far.

https://www.si.com/college/indiana/basketball/coaches-call-golden-state-warriors-trayce-jackson-davis-best-second-round-value-in-2023-nba-draft

This says "Jackson-Davis plans to sign a three-year deal with a team option in Year 3, a league source told Fieldhouse Files. And new Warriors general manager Mike Dunleavy Jr., a former Pacer, said Jackson-Davis will be part of the 15-man roster right away. That’s important because players selected after about 40 are typically signed to a two-way or non-guaranteed contract."

https://www.fieldhousefiles.com/p/warriors-buy-pick-draft-trayce-jackson-davis

Rumor has it, a few teams picking in the 30's and 40s were calling up his agent during the draft and asking if he would accept a 2-way contract. He said no, and that's why he fell to 57. The deeper we got into the draft, and into the 50's, those teams picking wanted the flexibility of being able to put that player on a 2-way. The warriors were the only team willing to give him a standard contract, and they traded with Washington to get that pick where the drafted him.

Lastly, TJD is not some young 19 yr old kid who is raw ad will need all kinds of development before he's ready for NBA minutes. He's 23 yrs old, will turn 24 during the upcoming season, played 4 yrs of college ball and was arguably the best college player in the country last season - he's polished, not raw. He certainly could be ready to contribute from day 1.

I was big on TJD coming into the draft, was on my list of desired picks - that said, if no one wanted to give him a second round deal that does say quite a bit. A standard second round deal would be for a lot more money and would lock him into a team control for 24-27, basically his prime years.

I do think GS is a great fit for him as they like passing bigs and probably have some playing time. I really do wonder if his defense is suspect though (GS was willing to give Trevion Williams a go after he couldn't hook on in Boston).

Only other better fit for him imo would have been Boston, since they have bigs handle/pass a lot but they also have shooting in the front court so he could have played a real hybrid 4/5 spot here.

Well, I think starting around pick 35, teams are gonna try and see if you will take a 2-way rather than having to commit a standard roster spot to a guy picked that late in the draft. So I don't really see it as a red flag. It happens every year where guys slip later in the 2nd round than anticipated (Jaden Hardy, EJ Liddell, Jabari Walker in 2022. In 2023 it was TJD, Rayan Rupert, Cissoko and GG Jackson).

TJD's defense is good. Solid for a big at switching out on the perimeter, good rim protector. His only issue defensively is being able to body up, muscle and defend really big guys like Zach Edey and Hunter Dickinson down in the low post, who had their way with him. But really big huge guys like that posting up on the low block is not a very common thing in today's NBA.

His fit with GS could be pretty good. Especially if the jumper comes along. He did not shoot much at all in college and when he did, they didn't go in, but he did look pretty good shooting jumpers at his Pro Day at the combine so we'll see if that translates..

TJD is much better defensively than Trevion Williams. Night and day difference there. TJD is also more athletic, more explosive, more mobile..was much more productive in college..

Personally I think if that was his only issue on D he would have been a first round pick. Pretty confident he will be a good shot blocker (or at least weak side shot blocker) but that's something tons of guys can do and isn't nearly enough. We will see what he does there but I'm suspicious his D is, uh, suspect.

Return to Boston Celtics