ImageImageImage

The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0)

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

User avatar
Zaschrona
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,932
And1: 1,362
Joined: Dec 10, 2011
Location: Czechia
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1701 » by Zaschrona » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:28 pm

Amir, Jae, AB and MEM pick to DET
Zeller, Jerebko, Young, 2018 BOS and a 2nd to NYK
Melo, Drummond and O'Quinn to BOS

IT/Rozier
Brown/Smart
Melo/GG
Horford/Olynyk
Drummond/O'Quinn
ajones9219
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,232
And1: 6,004
Joined: Apr 15, 2015
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1702 » by ajones9219 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:31 pm

Zaschrona wrote:Amir, Jae, AB and MEM pick to DET
Zeller, Jerebko, Young, 2018 BOS and a 2nd to NYK
Melo, Drummond and O'Quinn to BOS

IT/Rozier
Brown/Smart
Melo/GG
Horford/Olynyk
Drummond/O'Quinn


I could get down for that
User avatar
aim2please
Starter
Posts: 2,153
And1: 3,295
Joined: Mar 16, 2013
Location: Ego highway
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1703 » by aim2please » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:33 pm

Drummond thing is interesting. I truly believe he needs a positive coach and not 'in your face, screaming all day' guy like Stan. Dude looks like someone who lacks confidence.

But trading him for picks doesn't make sense from Detroit point of view. There's no way they're gonna rebuild. Only makes sense if it's a three team deal, DET gets another borderline all star center, we get Drummond and 3rd team gets pick(s).
User avatar
Green89
RealGM
Posts: 28,424
And1: 27,987
Joined: Apr 01, 2013

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1704 » by Green89 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:34 pm

Homerclease wrote:
Green89 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:That makes no sense. You can't count all the picks taken and then say the ones that weren't big men don't count. That's not how numbers work


So, we're not going to take a big with the BKN 18? The value of the pick in regards to using it for a big, has to also include the rate of which bigs are NOT taken with top 5 picks. Especially if you say you'd rather PICK a potential all star big with the top 5 pick, over getting Drummond. It does factor into the equation, although not in the 10% example I gave. That would be more complicated to compute.

Ok, list all the bigs taken in the top 5 in the past 5 years, this will give us a more accurate percentage


2010 draft: 3 bigs
2011 draft: 4 bigs
2012 draft: 2 bigs
2013 draft: 3 bigs
2014 draft: 2 bigs
2015 draft: 3 bigs

In these 6 drafts, 17 bigs taken and 3 all stars. Still only a 17% chance at these top 5 bigs being all stars.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,876
And1: 22,943
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1705 » by MotownMadness » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:34 pm

chrisab123 wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:
chrisab123 wrote:
Oh I think I would be inclined to deal the BRK 18 if nothing else comes of it for him. My only fear with him is that he cannot shoot free throws so all that really needs to happen is Hack-A-Shaq and send him to the line. Plus he can't shoot 3's.

I agree as the FTs are what hold him back from being a 20ppg player and it hurts at the end of games. I don't get the shooting 3s though. I think having 4 3 point shooters around a in the paint big is more then enough. I would rather have my center down low dominating then camping around the 3 point line.


The Celtics love 3 point shooters at all positions. They value it more than protecting the rim and rebounding so ultimately the team would 100% pass on Drummond.

I think he would open things up and get you even more 3s. Drummond is one of the best pick and roll bigs there are and if you don't fully commit to him rolling he's getting easy buckets. So it's as simple as commit and leave open 3s or let him have a field day at the rim. Pistons just don't have any good 3 point shooters so they just dare us to shoot them lol.
ajones9219
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,232
And1: 6,004
Joined: Apr 15, 2015
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1706 » by ajones9219 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:35 pm

aim2please wrote:Drummond thing is interesting. I truly believe he needs a positive coach and not 'in your face, screaming all day' guy like Stan. Dude looks like someone who lacks confidence.

But trading him for picks doesn't make sense from Detroit point of view. There's no way they're gonna rebuild. Only makes sense if it's a three team deal, DET gets another borderline all star center, we get Drummond and 3rd team gets pick(s).


If the rumors are true about them shipping off Jackson and Drummond, why would they not rebuild? They have other young assets to build around.
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1707 » by Homerclease » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:36 pm

Green89 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
Green89 wrote:
So, we're not going to take a big with the BKN 18? The value of the pick in regards to using it for a big, has to also include the rate of which bigs are NOT taken with top 5 picks. Especially if you say you'd rather PICK a potential all star big with the top 5 pick, over getting Drummond. It does factor into the equation, although not in the 10% example I gave. That would be more complicated to compute.

Ok, list all the bigs taken in the top 5 in the past 5 years, this will give us a more accurate percentage


2010 draft: 3 bigs
2011 draft: 4 bigs
2012 draft: 2 bigs
2013 draft: 3 bigs
2014 draft: 2 bigs
2015 draft: 3 bigs

In these 6 drafts, 17 bigs taken and 3 all stars. Still only a 17% chance at these top 5 bigs being all stars.

List their names. And just because guys like Towns, Embiid and Porzingis haven't made all star teams yet doesn't mean they aren't stars
User avatar
prov1ml
Starter
Posts: 2,064
And1: 2,157
Joined: Jun 25, 2014
     

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1708 » by prov1ml » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:38 pm

So, does DA try to nail down a big first (Drummond/Griffin) and then let Bird and Gar/Pax get nervous about the other trading for the "other" Nets pick or what would be the best plan of attack? If he can secure a big first, that might get both Chi & Ind to make the decision that they need to move now if they want that Nets pick....
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,216
And1: 10,627
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1709 » by chrisab123 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:38 pm

Zaschrona wrote:Amir, Jae, AB and MEM pick to DET
Zeller, Jerebko, Young, 2018 BOS and a 2nd to NYK
Melo, Drummond and O'Quinn to BOS

IT/Rozier
Brown/Smart
Melo/GG
Horford/Olynyk
Drummond/O'Quinn


I have zero clue if this would work financially speaking but this would be really good for Boston.
User avatar
Bar Fight
RealGM
Posts: 12,946
And1: 17,271
Joined: Sep 30, 2013
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1710 » by Bar Fight » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:39 pm

Green89 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
Green89 wrote:
So, we're not going to take a big with the BKN 18? The value of the pick in regards to using it for a big, has to also include the rate of which bigs are NOT taken with top 5 picks. Especially if you say you'd rather PICK a potential all star big with the top 5 pick, over getting Drummond. It does factor into the equation, although not in the 10% example I gave. That would be more complicated to compute.

Ok, list all the bigs taken in the top 5 in the past 5 years, this will give us a more accurate percentage


2010 draft: 3 bigs
2011 draft: 4 bigs
2012 draft: 2 bigs
2013 draft: 3 bigs
2014 draft: 2 bigs
2015 draft: 3 bigs

In these 6 drafts, 17 bigs taken and 3 all stars. Still only a 17% chance at these top 5 bigs being all stars.

Results in previous drafts don't dictate the quality of the player in upcoming ones.
TheOGJabroni
Head Coach
Posts: 6,475
And1: 1,994
Joined: Jul 28, 2007
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1711 » by TheOGJabroni » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:41 pm

Johnson, Zeller & BK 18 for Drummond. We have a team that is semi-ready to compete now and Drummond helps our greatest weakness. BK 18 would most likely be used on a big that we would hope has the potential that Drummond still has. This is a great move now, solid move for later as well.
User avatar
aim2please
Starter
Posts: 2,153
And1: 3,295
Joined: Mar 16, 2013
Location: Ego highway
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1712 » by aim2please » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:41 pm

ajones9219 wrote:
aim2please wrote:Drummond thing is interesting. I truly believe he needs a positive coach and not 'in your face, screaming all day' guy like Stan. Dude looks like someone who lacks confidence.

But trading him for picks doesn't make sense from Detroit point of view. There's no way they're gonna rebuild. Only makes sense if it's a three team deal, DET gets another borderline all star center, we get Drummond and 3rd team gets pick(s).


If the rumors are true about them shipping off Jackson and Drummond, why would they not rebuild? They have other young assets to build around.


The rumors were them taking back veterans on long-term deals like Rubio and DJ Augustin. You don't trade for them if you're thinking about rebuilding. I'm obviously just speculating, but I think Stan is sick of those guys and thinks he can retool by getting guys who fit his system better.

Jackson has the rep of being a ball stopper who kills their offensive flow and there was an article recently about Drummond demanding the ball in the post, while Stan wants him to be a p'n'r guy.

If Stan wasn't a GM, then rebuild would be an option. No coach volunteers to coach a 25 win team.
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1713 » by Andrew McCeltic » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:43 pm

aim2please wrote:Drummond thing is interesting. I truly believe he needs a positive coach and not 'in your face, screaming all day' guy like Stan. Dude looks like someone who lacks confidence.

But trading him for picks doesn't make sense from Detroit point of view. There's no way they're gonna rebuild. Only makes sense if it's a three team deal, DET gets another borderline all star center, we get Drummond and 3rd team gets pick(s).


Eh. They could get, or we could get them, Vucevic. Or a three-team deal where we get Melo and Drummond, the Pistons get, maybe, Noah and the Knicks' 1st (the tax for dumping 40 million in annual salary.)

But Detroit doesn't have much to tear down - they're fighting for the 8th spot, they have to decide whether to pay KCP, but otherwise their three best players are Jackson, Drummond and Tobias Harris.

They get Hezonja/Vuc for Reggie Jackson, dump Drummond's salary, they're looking at something roughly like-

KCP
Mario
Stanley Johnson
Tobias Harris
Vucevic

Plus a high lotto pick in a deep draft. They wouldn't be that much better or worse, but they'd have more flexibility, and they wouldn't have so much invested in a center who isn't fitting their system or timeline.
User avatar
Green89
RealGM
Posts: 28,424
And1: 27,987
Joined: Apr 01, 2013

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1714 » by Green89 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:45 pm

Homerclease wrote:
Green89 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Ok, list all the bigs taken in the top 5 in the past 5 years, this will give us a more accurate percentage


2010 draft: 3 bigs
2011 draft: 4 bigs
2012 draft: 2 bigs
2013 draft: 3 bigs
2014 draft: 2 bigs
2015 draft: 3 bigs

In these 6 drafts, 17 bigs taken and 3 all stars. Still only a 17% chance at these top 5 bigs being all stars.

List their names. And just because guys like Towns, Embiid and Porzingis haven't made all star teams yet doesn't mean they aren't stars


Damn, I mistakenly thought Towns was already an all star. Forgot he was only in rising stars. That makes the 10% and 17% percentages drop even more. :lol:

List the names? HAHA. Don't believe me, just look them up yourself.
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1715 » by Andrew McCeltic » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:45 pm

Don't want to just give away the BKN '18 - maybe swap rights with Detroit's 2018 1st, so they can leap past us to get Doncic or whoever.
User avatar
Green89
RealGM
Posts: 28,424
And1: 27,987
Joined: Apr 01, 2013

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1716 » by Green89 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:46 pm

Bar Fight wrote:
Green89 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Ok, list all the bigs taken in the top 5 in the past 5 years, this will give us a more accurate percentage


2010 draft: 3 bigs
2011 draft: 4 bigs
2012 draft: 2 bigs
2013 draft: 3 bigs
2014 draft: 2 bigs
2015 draft: 3 bigs

In these 6 drafts, 17 bigs taken and 3 all stars. Still only a 17% chance at these top 5 bigs being all stars.

Results in previous drafts don't dictate the quality of the player in upcoming ones.


True, but percentages of landing stars shouldn't fluctuate a ton from year to year.
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1717 » by Homerclease » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:46 pm

Green89 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
Green89 wrote:
2010 draft: 3 bigs
2011 draft: 4 bigs
2012 draft: 2 bigs
2013 draft: 3 bigs
2014 draft: 2 bigs
2015 draft: 3 bigs

In these 6 drafts, 17 bigs taken and 3 all stars. Still only a 17% chance at these top 5 bigs being all stars.

List their names. And just because guys like Towns, Embiid and Porzingis haven't made all star teams yet doesn't mean they aren't stars


Damn, I mistakenly thought Towns was already an all star. Forgot he was only in rising stars. That makes the 10% and 17% percentages drop even more. :lol:

List the names? HAHA. Don't believe me, just look them up yourself.

The fact is the odds of the player becoming at the minimum a solid rotation player on the level of Bradley and Crowder are actually over 60%
User avatar
ThirtyFour
Starter
Posts: 2,170
And1: 3,503
Joined: Jul 15, 2010
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1718 » by ThirtyFour » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:48 pm

Homerclease wrote:
Green89 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:List their names. And just because guys like Towns, Embiid and Porzingis haven't made all star teams yet doesn't mean they aren't stars


Damn, I mistakenly thought Towns was already an all star. Forgot he was only in rising stars. That makes the 10% and 17% percentages drop even more. :lol:

List the names? HAHA. Don't believe me, just look them up yourself.

The fact is the odds of the player becoming at the minimum a solid rotation player on the level of Bradley and Crowder are actually over 60%


Right but do you want to pass up a butler george or even a drummond for a 60% chance of a solid rotation player?
“There’s a sense of pride, there’s an edge you have to have to play here. I can only imagine the love, the reception, if you hung one of those banners up. It would be incredible — it’s going to be incredible. I know it.” —Jayson Tatum
User avatar
Green89
RealGM
Posts: 28,424
And1: 27,987
Joined: Apr 01, 2013

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1719 » by Green89 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:49 pm

Homerclease wrote:
Green89 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:List their names. And just because guys like Towns, Embiid and Porzingis haven't made all star teams yet doesn't mean they aren't stars


Damn, I mistakenly thought Towns was already an all star. Forgot he was only in rising stars. That makes the 10% and 17% percentages drop even more. :lol:

List the names? HAHA. Don't believe me, just look them up yourself.

The fact is the odds of the player becoming at the minimum a solid rotation player on the level of Bradley and Crowder are actually over 60%


Fine, but Drummond being a borderline all star shouldn't deter from the fact we know he's a proven player with some upside, and that's still less of a risk to me than using the BKN 18 on an unestablished big.
User avatar
Bar Fight
RealGM
Posts: 12,946
And1: 17,271
Joined: Sep 30, 2013
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1720 » by Bar Fight » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:49 pm

Green89 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
Green89 wrote:
2010 draft: 3 bigs
2011 draft: 4 bigs
2012 draft: 2 bigs
2013 draft: 3 bigs
2014 draft: 2 bigs
2015 draft: 3 bigs

In these 6 drafts, 17 bigs taken and 3 all stars. Still only a 17% chance at these top 5 bigs being all stars.

List their names. And just because guys like Towns, Embiid and Porzingis haven't made all star teams yet doesn't mean they aren't stars


Damn, I mistakenly thought Towns was already an all star. Forgot he was only in rising stars. That makes the 10% and 17% percentages drop even more. :lol:

List the names? HAHA. Don't believe me, just look them up yourself.

Towns, Porzingis, and Embiid are all future stars and elite players in the league. So your number was disingenuous anyway. And I'm still struggling to see how any of this has any relevance to the value of the prospects in 2018. We don't know if they'll be great or not yet, it's too early. But the lack of immediate elite, all star in their first or second season bigs in the last few drafts won't be a factor in it.

Return to Boston Celtics