Bill Lumbergh wrote:Hal14 wrote:brackdan70 wrote:Walsh is better, younger and way more upside than Bassey.
That would be a bad move IMO.
I’d like to sign Bassey but I think you do it by trading Niang or Tillman or someone else.
Bassey tore it up in summer league….that doesn’t mean he is better than Queta.
Also:
a) Summer league means basically nothing in terms of projecting how good a guy is an a real NBA game. If SL was super important for projecting players in the NBA, then Carsen Edwards would be better than Trae Young and Mfiondu Kabengele would be better than Wemby.
b) Bassey only played 3 SL games for us..that's a tiny sample size. In the 1 game where he had to face a legit NBA level big (vs Miami with Kel'El Ware), he was meh..also, most of the damage he did in SL was coming off the bench, going against SL bench players
c) He's 24 yrs old with 4 yrs of NBA experience..he's supposed to be good in SL..again, it means very little for what he would do in a real game NBA, hence why he has has basically 0 NBA teams all offseason show interest in signing him
Well, he does have better regular season per 36 numbers than Queta, too. I actually would like to keep both Queta, who I like fine, too, and sign Bassey. Bassey has had injuries, which have hindered him. What he proved in summer league is that he is healthy. Queta is 26, and bounced around from G league to the Kings roster. He finally got more of a shot when he was in Boston. Sometimes it's a matter of opportunity and environment, which were beneficial for Queta.
This is not a hill I am dying on. It's not that big a deal. I am just saying that, to my eye, I liked what I saw, and think he looks at least as promising as Queta, and that dropping Walsh for a roster spot and savings, is a neglible cost to sign Bassey, as I am not high on Walsh. Kumbaya.
This is eye of the beholder stuff. You be holdin a different viewpoint than I do.
Are we not factoring in any context?
Just blindly looking at numbers and taking them at face value?
C'mon now. Surely we all understand that it's easy to put up numbers for a bad Spurs team that lost Wemby for most of the season (meaning more opportunity for a guy like Bassey) and was tanking for the entire 2nd half of the season and it's harder to put up numbers for a guy like Queta on a team as deep and talented as Boston was last season.
Also, sample sizes matter. Bassey only played in 36 games last season. And only played 10 MPG. That's such a tiny sample size, that his numbers during those mins are basically meaningless.
36 games, 10 MPG for Bassey = not a statistically significant sample size of data
62 games, 13.9 MPG for Queta = it is a statistically significant sample size of data
There's a reason why 1 of them is our projected starting center, while the other one had to play summer league just to try and get minimum contract offer from an NBA team, despite already having 4 yrs of NBA experience under his belt.
Literally the only teams who have shown interest in signing Bassey to a contract for the upcoming season are in Europe..